영국에서 근대 초부터 본격적으로 성장해온 가정성 이념은 성별에 의해 분리된 공-사 영역의 개념과 결부돼 진화하면서 가족이나 가정과 관련된 문제들-혼인, 배우자들 간의 관계, 자식의 ...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104060079
조용욱 (국민대학교)
2013
Korean
Domesticity ; Public Sphere ; Private Sphere ; Separate Spheres ; Gender Relations ; 가정성 ; 공공영역 ; 사적영역 ; 분리된 영역 ; 젠더관계
KCI등재
학술저널
325-356(32쪽)
3
0
상세조회0
다운로드국문 초록 (Abstract)
영국에서 근대 초부터 본격적으로 성장해온 가정성 이념은 성별에 의해 분리된 공-사 영역의 개념과 결부돼 진화하면서 가족이나 가정과 관련된 문제들-혼인, 배우자들 간의 관계, 자식의 ...
영국에서 근대 초부터 본격적으로 성장해온 가정성 이념은 성별에 의해 분리된 공-사 영역의 개념과 결부돼 진화하면서 가족이나 가정과 관련된 문제들-혼인, 배우자들 간의 관계, 자식의 지위, 재산권, 상속권, 부모의 권위 등-에 직접적으로 관련될 수밖에 없었다. 17세기 후반 리처드 올스트리에 의해 본격적 모습을 갖추게 된 가정성 개념은 18세기를 통해 일반화됐고 19세기 중엽에 와서는 절정에 이르렀다. 중요한 것은 가정성 이념의 요체인 분리된 영역의 경계가 늘 불안정하고 가변적이었으며, 사회관계 전반에 긴장과 알력을 증폭시켰다는 사실이다.
가정성 이념은 근대 초부터 19세기말까지 크게 보아 세 시기를 거치면서 진화했다. 첫 시기는 17세기말에서 18세기말에 이르는 기간으로 가정성과 분리된 영역의 이념적 헤게모니가 확립된 때였다. 두 번째는 18세기말에 시작돼 1830년경에 이르는 시기로 새로운 젠더 관계에 대한 주장과 논쟁이 잠시나마 진행된 때였지만, 복음주의 담론이 분리된 영역의 이데올로기를 한층 더 강화시킨 때이기도 했다. 특히, 이 시기 젠더관계의 불안은 자체의 모순에서 만큼이나 프랑스혁명에서 기인한 바가 컸었다. 마지막으로, 1830년경에서 1880년대까지에는 이전과는 상당히 다른 모습이 나타났다. 한편으로 이 시기는 가정성 이념의 확산에 가장 저항이 미약했고 분리된 영역의 개념이 가장 자연스럽고도 안정적인 것으로 비춰진 때였다. 그러나 다른 한편으로 이 시기는 가정성 이념과 구조에 대해 변화와 도전의 압력이 가장 고조된 때이기도 했다. 결혼한 여성의 재산권과 법적 지위를 위해 캐럴라인 노턴이, 그리고 악명 높은 접촉성전염병법의 폐지를 위해 조우저핀 버틀러가 대대적인 운동을 벌였을 때, 이들은 기존 가정성 이념의 전제와 수사를 전면적으로 거부하기보다는 그것을 사용하고 이용했다. 하지만, 이 과정 속에서 가정성 이념의 모순과 이중성이 어느 때보다도 더 분명하게 노출됐고, 국가간섭이 도덕개혁의 이름으로 사적 영역의 전통적 경계선을 크게 침범하게 됐다. 그 결과는 국가-시민사회의 공공영역-사적영역의 전면적 재편과 20세기의 ‘규제적이고 간섭적인’ 국가의 도래였다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The concept of domesticity based on the notion of separate spheres has been an influential force in the formation of British social relations since the early modern era. The idea of domesticity dictates ‘proper’ male and female spheres-men’s pub...
The concept of domesticity based on the notion of separate spheres has been an influential force in the formation of British social relations since the early modern era. The idea of domesticity dictates ‘proper’ male and female spheres-men’s public sphere, the world of politics, commerce and the law on the one hand, and women’s private realm, that is, the terrain of child-rearing and housekeeping on the other. As such, the idea was, of necessity, not only intertwined with crucial issues regarding the family like matrimony, divorce, property right, inheritance, and child abuse, but also played a central role in forging the relations and boundaries between the state, public sphere of civil society, and private sphere.
The ideology of domesticity in modern Britain went through three distinct stages, and each had its own qualities and characteristics. In the first period from the late seventeenth to the late eighteenth centuries the idea of domesticity and separate spheres was firmly established and entrenched, even though such women as Lady Mary Wortley Montagu and Catherine Macaulay made valiant and vehement attacks on it. The second period extending from the late eighteenth century to about 1830 saw a series of public debates in search of a new and alternative gender relationship as was exemplified by Mary Wollstonecraft, but the enormous evangelical thrust centered on the energetic Clapham Sect greatly reinforced the idea of separate spheres. The instabilities of the gender relations in this period were spawned as much by the French Revolution as by the internal contradictions themselves.
The final phase ending with the 1880s witnessed a curious and interesting turnabout. On the one hand, the hegemony of the separate spheres domesticity was least challenged for much of the period. On the other hand however, this stage was the moment of greatest challenges to the system of domesticity, and the resultant instabilities and contradictions could no longer be contained. Women like Caroline Norton and Josephine Butler, using and employing the conventional assumptions and rhetorics of domesticity, launched serious and effective campaigns for the rights of married women and the repeal of the hated Contagious Diseases Acts. The result was not only the growing and decisive intrusion of state power into the system of domesticity, but also the significant redrawing of the boundaries between the state, public sphere of civil society, and private sphere.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 조용욱, "근대 영국에서의 공공영역-자원단체와 도덕개혁" 한국서양사학회 (110) : 68-96, 2011
2 Mary Thale, "Women in Debating Societies in 1780" 7 (7): 5-24, 1995
3 Frank Procheska, "Women and Philanthropy in Nineteenth-Century England" 1-17, 1980
4 Sophia, "Women Not Inferior to Men" 1739
5 Marjorie Gerber, "Vested Interests: Cross Dressing and Cultural Anxiety" 259-265, 1992
6 Mary Poovey, "Uneven Developments: The Ideological Work of Gender in Mid-Victorian England" 98-108, 1988
7 Mary Poovey, "Uneven Developments: The Ideological Work of Gender in Mid-Victorian England" 51-88, 1988
8 George Macaulay, "Trevelyan, The Life of John Bright" 154-, 1913
9 Catherine Hall, "The Sweet Delights of Home, In A History of Private Life, vol.IV" 50-64, 1990
10 Anna Clark, "The Struggle for the Breeches: Gender and the Making of the British Working Class" 42-62, 1995
1 조용욱, "근대 영국에서의 공공영역-자원단체와 도덕개혁" 한국서양사학회 (110) : 68-96, 2011
2 Mary Thale, "Women in Debating Societies in 1780" 7 (7): 5-24, 1995
3 Frank Procheska, "Women and Philanthropy in Nineteenth-Century England" 1-17, 1980
4 Sophia, "Women Not Inferior to Men" 1739
5 Marjorie Gerber, "Vested Interests: Cross Dressing and Cultural Anxiety" 259-265, 1992
6 Mary Poovey, "Uneven Developments: The Ideological Work of Gender in Mid-Victorian England" 98-108, 1988
7 Mary Poovey, "Uneven Developments: The Ideological Work of Gender in Mid-Victorian England" 51-88, 1988
8 George Macaulay, "Trevelyan, The Life of John Bright" 154-, 1913
9 Catherine Hall, "The Sweet Delights of Home, In A History of Private Life, vol.IV" 50-64, 1990
10 Anna Clark, "The Struggle for the Breeches: Gender and the Making of the British Working Class" 42-62, 1995
11 Jürgen Habermas, "The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere" 1989
12 Kathleen Wilson, "The Sense of the People: Politics, Culture and Imperialism in England, 1715-1785" 27-83, 1995
13 Anna Clark, "The Rhetoric of Chartist Domesticity: Gender, Language and Class in the 1830s and 1840s" 31 (31): 66-89, 1992
14 Thomas Laqueur, "The Queen Caroline Affair: Politics as Art in the Reign of George IV" 54 (54): 417-466, 1982
15 Andrew Ure, "The Philosophy of Manufactures" 309-312, 1968
16 Amanda Vickery, "The Neglected Century: Writing the History of Eighteenth-Century Women" 3 (3): 211-219, 1991
17 Margaret R. Hunt, "The Middling Sort: Commerce, Gender, and the Family in England, 1680-1780" 8-9, 1996
18 Richard Allstree, "The Ladies Calling" 11-12, 1787
19 Hannah Arendt, "The Human Conditions" 1958
20 Paul Thompson, "The Edwardians: The Remaking of British Society" 1975
21 Catherine Hall, "The Early Formation of Victorian Domestic Ideology, In Fit Work for Women" 21-22, 1979
22 G. J. Barker-Benfield, "The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain" 28-32, 1992
23 David Cannadine, "The Context, Performance and Meaning of Ritual: The British Monarchy and the Invention of Tradition, c.1820-1977, In The Invention of Tradition" 101-164, 1983
24 Robert Roberts, "The Classic Slum: Salford Life in the First Quarter of the Century" 1973
25 Ruth Perry, "The Celebrated Mary Astell: An Early English Feminist" 99-119, 1986
26 Peter Gay, "The Bourgeois Experience: Victoria to Freud, vol.1" Education of the Senses 1984
27 Hannah More, "Strictures on the Modern System of Female Education, In The Works of Hannah More, vol.I" 335-338, 1837
28 Ralf Dahrendorf, "Society and Democracy in Germany" 1965
29 Madge Dresser, "Sisters and Brethren: Power, Propriety and Gender Among the Bristol Moravians, 1746-1833" 21 (21): 304-329, 1996
30 Jeffrey Weeks, "Sex, Politics and Society, p.24; Rachel Harrison and Frank Mort, In Patriarchal Aspects of Nineteenth-Century State Formation" Capitalism, State Formation and Marxist Theory 81-99, 1980
31 Richard Davenport -Hines, "Sex, Death and Punishment: Attitudes to Sex and Sexuality in Britain Since the Renaissance" 1990
32 Kathleen Wilson, "Sense of the People" 40-44,
33 Lawrence Stone, "Road to Divorce:England, 1530-1987" 96-128, 1989
34 Margaret Homans, "Remaking Queen Victoria" 3-7, 1997
35 David Zaret, "Religion, Science and Printing in the Public Spheres in Late Seventeenth-Century England, In Habermas and the Public Sphere" 213-227,
36 Dorothy Thompson, "Queen Victoria: The Woman, The Monarch and The People" 1990
37 Judith Walkowitz, "Prostitution and Victorian Society: Women, Class and the State" 1980
38 Judith Walkowitz, "Prostitution and Victorian Society" 81-82,
39 Deborah Valenze, "Prophetic Sons and Daughters" 11-, 1985
40 G. M. Young, "Portrait of an Age"
41 Donna Andrew, "Popular Culture and Public Debate: London 1780" 39 (39): 410-414, 1996
42 John Brewer, "Pleasures of Imagination: English Culture in the Eighteenth Century" 167-168, 2000
43 Josephine Butler, "Personal Reminiscences of a Great Crusade" 18-19 18-19, 1896
44 Rachel Harrison, "Patriarchal Aspects of Nineteenth-Century State Formation"
45 F. Trentmann, "Paradoxes of Civil Society: New Perspectives on Modern German and British History" 2000
46 Norton Rictor, "Mother Clap's Molly House: Gay Subculture in England 1700-1830" 1992
47 Janet Todd, "Mary Wollstonecraft: Political Writings" 109-113, 1993
48 Susan Staves, "Married Women's Separate Property in England 1660-1833" 4-5, 1990
49 Mary Poovey, "Making A Social Body: British Cultural Formation 1830-1864" 1995
50 Sonya Rose, "Limited Livelihood: Gender and Class in Nineteenth-Century England" 70-74, 1992
51 Catherine Macaulay Graham, "Letters on Education with Observation on Religious and Metaphysical Subjects" 205-206, 1790
52 "Letter to the Queen on Lord Chancellor Cranworth's Marriage and Divorce Bill"
53 Robert Gray, "Languages of Factory Reform, c. 1830-c.1860, In Historical Meanings of Work" 143-179, 1830
54 Jose Harris, "Introduction: Civil Society in British History: Paradigm orPeculiarity?, In Civil Society in British History: Ideas, Identities, Institutions" 1-2,
55 Craig Calhoun, "Introduction, In Habermas and the Public Sphere" 33-38,
56 Dror Wharman, "Imagining the Middle Class: The Political Representation of Class in Britain, c. 1780-1840" 1995
57 Craig Calhoun, "Habermas and the Public Sphere" 1992
58 Amanda Vickery, "Golden Age to Separate Spheres?: A Review of the Categories and Chronology of English Women's History" 36 (36): 383-414, 1993
59 M. Glasius, "Global Civil Society" 2002
60 H. C. G. Matthew, "Gladstone, vol.1, 1809-1874" 92-95, 1874
61 Jonathan Fulcher, "Gender, Politics, and Gender in the Early Nineteenth -Century English Reform Movement" 67 (67): 57-74, 1994
62 Randolph Trumbach, "Gender and the Homosexual Role in Modern Western Culture: The Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries Compared, In Which Homosexuality?" 149-169, 1989
63 Jane Mark-Lawson, "From Family Labour to Family Wage?: The Case of Women's Labour in Nineteenth-Century Coal-Mining" 13 (13): 151-174, 1988
64 John Gillis, "For Better, For Worse: British Marriages, 1600 to the Present" 140-141, 1985
65 Mary Lyndon Shanley, "Feminism, Marriage and the Law in Victorian England, 1850-1895" 1993
66 Mary Lyndon Shanley, "Feminism, Marriage and the Law in Victorian England, 1850-1895" 78-79, 1989
67 Mary Lyndon Shanley, "Feminism, Marriage and the Law in Victorian England" 10-17, 74-76 1850-1895, 1895
68 M. J. D. Roberts, "Feminism and the State in Later Victorian England" 31 (31): 96-104, 1995
69 F. K. Brown, "Fathers of the Victorians" 1961
70 Leonore Davidoff, "Family Fortunes: Men and Women of the English Middle Class,1780-1850" 1987
71 Leonore Davidoff, "Family Fortunes" 114-118,
72 Martha Vicinus, "Ever Your, Florence Nightingale: Selected Letters" 1990
73 Barbara Taylor, "Eve and the New Jerusalem: Socialism and Feminism in the Nineteenth Century" 1983
74 Ranajit Guha, "Dominance Without Hegemony and Its Historiography, In Subaltern Studies, vol.VI" Writings on South Asian History and Society 210-303, 1989
75 J. Garrard, "Democratisation in Britain. Elites, Civil Society, and Reform in Britain Since1800" 2002
76 Ruth Richardson, "Death, Dissection and the Destitute" 1988
77 Barker-Benfield, "Culture of Sensibility" 389-391,
78 "Complete Works of Hannah More, vol.I"
79 J.Ehrenberg, "Civil Society: The Critical History of an Idea" 1999
80 S. Kaviraj, "Civil Society: History and Possibilities" 2001
81 J. A. Hall, "Civil Society. Theory, History, Comparison" 1995
82 Jose Harris, "Civil Society in British History: Ideas, Identities, Institutions" 2005
83 Olive Anderson, "Civil Marriage in Victorian England and Wales" (69) : 56-86, 1975
84 Judith Walkowitz, "City of Dreadful Delight" 1993
85 Judith Walkowitz, "City of Dreadful Delight" 1993
86 George Behlmer, "Child Abuse and Moral Reform in England 1870-1914" 1-12, 1982
87 Mary Ann Tétreault,, "Chapter II, The Public and the Private Realm, Frontier Politics: Sex, Gender, and the Deconstruction of the Public Spheres" 26 (26): 53-72, 2001
88 Caroline Norton, "Caroline Norton's Defense" 1982
89 Linda Colley, "Britons" 237-281,
90 J. A. Cannon, "Aristocratic Century: The Peerage in Eighteenth-Century England" 73-92, 1984
91 Denise Riley, "Am I That Name?:Feminism and the Category of “Women” in History" 1990
92 Asa Briggs, "Age of Improvement, 1783-1867" 69-74 69-74, 1999
93 Mary Astell, "A Serious Proposal to the Ladies for the Advancement of Their True and Greatest Interest" 1970
94 Paul Langford, "A Polite and Commercial People" 109-116,
95 Paul Langford, "A Polite and Commercial People" 109-116,
96 Pearce Stevenson, "A Plain Letter to the Lord Chancellor on the Infant Custody Bill" 1839
97 Standish Meacham, "A Life Apart: The English Working Class 1890-1914" 1977
98 Bonnie Anderson, "A History of Their Own: Women in Europe from Prehistory to the Present vol.II" II 116-118, 1988
99 Bonnie S. Anderson, "A History of Their Own" 138-140,
朝鮮後期 正祖代의 政局과 市廛政策 -貢市人詢瘼을 중심으로
慶尙道 昆陽 栖鳳寺의 事跡과 佛書刊行 - 李穀의『栖鳳寺事跡』을 중심으로 -
광복 후 ‘안중근 의사 유해 찾기’의 경과와 역사적 검토
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
2019-05-02 | 학회명변경 | 영문명 : A Laboratory of Korean Studies -> Institute of Korean Studies | ![]() |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
2012-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.23 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.36 | 0.38 | 0.553 | 0.14 |