RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      근대 영국에서의 가정성(Domesticity) 이념 = “The Ideology of Domesticity in Modern Britain”

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104060079

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      영국에서 근대 초부터 본격적으로 성장해온 가정성 이념은 성별에 의해 분리된 공-사 영역의 개념과 결부돼 진화하면서 가족이나 가정과 관련된 문제들-혼인, 배우자들 간의 관계, 자식의 지위, 재산권, 상속권, 부모의 권위 등-에 직접적으로 관련될 수밖에 없었다. 17세기 후반 리처드 올스트리에 의해 본격적 모습을 갖추게 된 가정성 개념은 18세기를 통해 일반화됐고 19세기 중엽에 와서는 절정에 이르렀다. 중요한 것은 가정성 이념의 요체인 분리된 영역의 경계가 늘 불안정하고 가변적이었으며, 사회관계 전반에 긴장과 알력을 증폭시켰다는 사실이다.
      가정성 이념은 근대 초부터 19세기말까지 크게 보아 세 시기를 거치면서 진화했다. 첫 시기는 17세기말에서 18세기말에 이르는 기간으로 가정성과 분리된 영역의 이념적 헤게모니가 확립된 때였다. 두 번째는 18세기말에 시작돼 1830년경에 이르는 시기로 새로운 젠더 관계에 대한 주장과 논쟁이 잠시나마 진행된 때였지만, 복음주의 담론이 분리된 영역의 이데올로기를 한층 더 강화시킨 때이기도 했다. 특히, 이 시기 젠더관계의 불안은 자체의 모순에서 만큼이나 프랑스혁명에서 기인한 바가 컸었다. 마지막으로, 1830년경에서 1880년대까지에는 이전과는 상당히 다른 모습이 나타났다. 한편으로 이 시기는 가정성 이념의 확산에 가장 저항이 미약했고 분리된 영역의 개념이 가장 자연스럽고도 안정적인 것으로 비춰진 때였다. 그러나 다른 한편으로 이 시기는 가정성 이념과 구조에 대해 변화와 도전의 압력이 가장 고조된 때이기도 했다. 결혼한 여성의 재산권과 법적 지위를 위해 캐럴라인 노턴이, 그리고 악명 높은 접촉성전염병법의 폐지를 위해 조우저핀 버틀러가 대대적인 운동을 벌였을 때, 이들은 기존 가정성 이념의 전제와 수사를 전면적으로 거부하기보다는 그것을 사용하고 이용했다. 하지만, 이 과정 속에서 가정성 이념의 모순과 이중성이 어느 때보다도 더 분명하게 노출됐고, 국가간섭이 도덕개혁의 이름으로 사적 영역의 전통적 경계선을 크게 침범하게 됐다. 그 결과는 국가-시민사회의 공공영역-사적영역의 전면적 재편과 20세기의 ‘규제적이고 간섭적인’ 국가의 도래였다.
      번역하기

      영국에서 근대 초부터 본격적으로 성장해온 가정성 이념은 성별에 의해 분리된 공-사 영역의 개념과 결부돼 진화하면서 가족이나 가정과 관련된 문제들-혼인, 배우자들 간의 관계, 자식의 ...

      영국에서 근대 초부터 본격적으로 성장해온 가정성 이념은 성별에 의해 분리된 공-사 영역의 개념과 결부돼 진화하면서 가족이나 가정과 관련된 문제들-혼인, 배우자들 간의 관계, 자식의 지위, 재산권, 상속권, 부모의 권위 등-에 직접적으로 관련될 수밖에 없었다. 17세기 후반 리처드 올스트리에 의해 본격적 모습을 갖추게 된 가정성 개념은 18세기를 통해 일반화됐고 19세기 중엽에 와서는 절정에 이르렀다. 중요한 것은 가정성 이념의 요체인 분리된 영역의 경계가 늘 불안정하고 가변적이었으며, 사회관계 전반에 긴장과 알력을 증폭시켰다는 사실이다.
      가정성 이념은 근대 초부터 19세기말까지 크게 보아 세 시기를 거치면서 진화했다. 첫 시기는 17세기말에서 18세기말에 이르는 기간으로 가정성과 분리된 영역의 이념적 헤게모니가 확립된 때였다. 두 번째는 18세기말에 시작돼 1830년경에 이르는 시기로 새로운 젠더 관계에 대한 주장과 논쟁이 잠시나마 진행된 때였지만, 복음주의 담론이 분리된 영역의 이데올로기를 한층 더 강화시킨 때이기도 했다. 특히, 이 시기 젠더관계의 불안은 자체의 모순에서 만큼이나 프랑스혁명에서 기인한 바가 컸었다. 마지막으로, 1830년경에서 1880년대까지에는 이전과는 상당히 다른 모습이 나타났다. 한편으로 이 시기는 가정성 이념의 확산에 가장 저항이 미약했고 분리된 영역의 개념이 가장 자연스럽고도 안정적인 것으로 비춰진 때였다. 그러나 다른 한편으로 이 시기는 가정성 이념과 구조에 대해 변화와 도전의 압력이 가장 고조된 때이기도 했다. 결혼한 여성의 재산권과 법적 지위를 위해 캐럴라인 노턴이, 그리고 악명 높은 접촉성전염병법의 폐지를 위해 조우저핀 버틀러가 대대적인 운동을 벌였을 때, 이들은 기존 가정성 이념의 전제와 수사를 전면적으로 거부하기보다는 그것을 사용하고 이용했다. 하지만, 이 과정 속에서 가정성 이념의 모순과 이중성이 어느 때보다도 더 분명하게 노출됐고, 국가간섭이 도덕개혁의 이름으로 사적 영역의 전통적 경계선을 크게 침범하게 됐다. 그 결과는 국가-시민사회의 공공영역-사적영역의 전면적 재편과 20세기의 ‘규제적이고 간섭적인’ 국가의 도래였다.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The concept of domesticity based on the notion of separate spheres has been an influential force in the formation of British social relations since the early modern era. The idea of domesticity dictates ‘proper’ male and female spheres-men’s public sphere, the world of politics, commerce and the law on the one hand, and women’s private realm, that is, the terrain of child-rearing and housekeeping on the other. As such, the idea was, of necessity, not only intertwined with crucial issues regarding the family like matrimony, divorce, property right, inheritance, and child abuse, but also played a central role in forging the relations and boundaries between the state, public sphere of civil society, and private sphere.
      The ideology of domesticity in modern Britain went through three distinct stages, and each had its own qualities and characteristics. In the first period from the late seventeenth to the late eighteenth centuries the idea of domesticity and separate spheres was firmly established and entrenched, even though such women as Lady Mary Wortley Montagu and Catherine Macaulay made valiant and vehement attacks on it. The second period extending from the late eighteenth century to about 1830 saw a series of public debates in search of a new and alternative gender relationship as was exemplified by Mary Wollstonecraft, but the enormous evangelical thrust centered on the energetic Clapham Sect greatly reinforced the idea of separate spheres. The instabilities of the gender relations in this period were spawned as much by the French Revolution as by the internal contradictions themselves.
      The final phase ending with the 1880s witnessed a curious and interesting turnabout. On the one hand, the hegemony of the separate spheres domesticity was least challenged for much of the period. On the other hand however, this stage was the moment of greatest challenges to the system of domesticity, and the resultant instabilities and contradictions could no longer be contained. Women like Caroline Norton and Josephine Butler, using and employing the conventional assumptions and rhetorics of domesticity, launched serious and effective campaigns for the rights of married women and the repeal of the hated Contagious Diseases Acts. The result was not only the growing and decisive intrusion of state power into the system of domesticity, but also the significant redrawing of the boundaries between the state, public sphere of civil society, and private sphere.
      번역하기

      The concept of domesticity based on the notion of separate spheres has been an influential force in the formation of British social relations since the early modern era. The idea of domesticity dictates ‘proper’ male and female spheres-men’s pub...

      The concept of domesticity based on the notion of separate spheres has been an influential force in the formation of British social relations since the early modern era. The idea of domesticity dictates ‘proper’ male and female spheres-men’s public sphere, the world of politics, commerce and the law on the one hand, and women’s private realm, that is, the terrain of child-rearing and housekeeping on the other. As such, the idea was, of necessity, not only intertwined with crucial issues regarding the family like matrimony, divorce, property right, inheritance, and child abuse, but also played a central role in forging the relations and boundaries between the state, public sphere of civil society, and private sphere.
      The ideology of domesticity in modern Britain went through three distinct stages, and each had its own qualities and characteristics. In the first period from the late seventeenth to the late eighteenth centuries the idea of domesticity and separate spheres was firmly established and entrenched, even though such women as Lady Mary Wortley Montagu and Catherine Macaulay made valiant and vehement attacks on it. The second period extending from the late eighteenth century to about 1830 saw a series of public debates in search of a new and alternative gender relationship as was exemplified by Mary Wollstonecraft, but the enormous evangelical thrust centered on the energetic Clapham Sect greatly reinforced the idea of separate spheres. The instabilities of the gender relations in this period were spawned as much by the French Revolution as by the internal contradictions themselves.
      The final phase ending with the 1880s witnessed a curious and interesting turnabout. On the one hand, the hegemony of the separate spheres domesticity was least challenged for much of the period. On the other hand however, this stage was the moment of greatest challenges to the system of domesticity, and the resultant instabilities and contradictions could no longer be contained. Women like Caroline Norton and Josephine Butler, using and employing the conventional assumptions and rhetorics of domesticity, launched serious and effective campaigns for the rights of married women and the repeal of the hated Contagious Diseases Acts. The result was not only the growing and decisive intrusion of state power into the system of domesticity, but also the significant redrawing of the boundaries between the state, public sphere of civil society, and private sphere.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 조용욱, "근대 영국에서의 공공영역-자원단체와 도덕개혁" 한국서양사학회 (110) : 68-96, 2011

      2 Mary Thale, "Women in Debating Societies in 1780" 7 (7): 5-24, 1995

      3 Frank Procheska, "Women and Philanthropy in Nineteenth-Century England" 1-17, 1980

      4 Sophia, "Women Not Inferior to Men" 1739

      5 Marjorie Gerber, "Vested Interests: Cross Dressing and Cultural Anxiety" 259-265, 1992

      6 Mary Poovey, "Uneven Developments: The Ideological Work of Gender in Mid-Victorian England" 98-108, 1988

      7 Mary Poovey, "Uneven Developments: The Ideological Work of Gender in Mid-Victorian England" 51-88, 1988

      8 George Macaulay, "Trevelyan, The Life of John Bright" 154-, 1913

      9 Catherine Hall, "The Sweet Delights of Home, In A History of Private Life, vol.IV" 50-64, 1990

      10 Anna Clark, "The Struggle for the Breeches: Gender and the Making of the British Working Class" 42-62, 1995

      1 조용욱, "근대 영국에서의 공공영역-자원단체와 도덕개혁" 한국서양사학회 (110) : 68-96, 2011

      2 Mary Thale, "Women in Debating Societies in 1780" 7 (7): 5-24, 1995

      3 Frank Procheska, "Women and Philanthropy in Nineteenth-Century England" 1-17, 1980

      4 Sophia, "Women Not Inferior to Men" 1739

      5 Marjorie Gerber, "Vested Interests: Cross Dressing and Cultural Anxiety" 259-265, 1992

      6 Mary Poovey, "Uneven Developments: The Ideological Work of Gender in Mid-Victorian England" 98-108, 1988

      7 Mary Poovey, "Uneven Developments: The Ideological Work of Gender in Mid-Victorian England" 51-88, 1988

      8 George Macaulay, "Trevelyan, The Life of John Bright" 154-, 1913

      9 Catherine Hall, "The Sweet Delights of Home, In A History of Private Life, vol.IV" 50-64, 1990

      10 Anna Clark, "The Struggle for the Breeches: Gender and the Making of the British Working Class" 42-62, 1995

      11 Jürgen Habermas, "The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere" 1989

      12 Kathleen Wilson, "The Sense of the People: Politics, Culture and Imperialism in England, 1715-1785" 27-83, 1995

      13 Anna Clark, "The Rhetoric of Chartist Domesticity: Gender, Language and Class in the 1830s and 1840s" 31 (31): 66-89, 1992

      14 Thomas Laqueur, "The Queen Caroline Affair: Politics as Art in the Reign of George IV" 54 (54): 417-466, 1982

      15 Andrew Ure, "The Philosophy of Manufactures" 309-312, 1968

      16 Amanda Vickery, "The Neglected Century: Writing the History of Eighteenth-Century Women" 3 (3): 211-219, 1991

      17 Margaret R. Hunt, "The Middling Sort: Commerce, Gender, and the Family in England, 1680-1780" 8-9, 1996

      18 Richard Allstree, "The Ladies Calling" 11-12, 1787

      19 Hannah Arendt, "The Human Conditions" 1958

      20 Paul Thompson, "The Edwardians: The Remaking of British Society" 1975

      21 Catherine Hall, "The Early Formation of Victorian Domestic Ideology, In Fit Work for Women" 21-22, 1979

      22 G. J. Barker-Benfield, "The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain" 28-32, 1992

      23 David Cannadine, "The Context, Performance and Meaning of Ritual: The British Monarchy and the Invention of Tradition, c.1820-1977, In The Invention of Tradition" 101-164, 1983

      24 Robert Roberts, "The Classic Slum: Salford Life in the First Quarter of the Century" 1973

      25 Ruth Perry, "The Celebrated Mary Astell: An Early English Feminist" 99-119, 1986

      26 Peter Gay, "The Bourgeois Experience: Victoria to Freud, vol.1" Education of the Senses 1984

      27 Hannah More, "Strictures on the Modern System of Female Education, In The Works of Hannah More, vol.I" 335-338, 1837

      28 Ralf Dahrendorf, "Society and Democracy in Germany" 1965

      29 Madge Dresser, "Sisters and Brethren: Power, Propriety and Gender Among the Bristol Moravians, 1746-1833" 21 (21): 304-329, 1996

      30 Jeffrey Weeks, "Sex, Politics and Society, p.24; Rachel Harrison and Frank Mort, In Patriarchal Aspects of Nineteenth-Century State Formation" Capitalism, State Formation and Marxist Theory 81-99, 1980

      31 Richard Davenport -Hines, "Sex, Death and Punishment: Attitudes to Sex and Sexuality in Britain Since the Renaissance" 1990

      32 Kathleen Wilson, "Sense of the People" 40-44,

      33 Lawrence Stone, "Road to Divorce:England, 1530-1987" 96-128, 1989

      34 Margaret Homans, "Remaking Queen Victoria" 3-7, 1997

      35 David Zaret, "Religion, Science and Printing in the Public Spheres in Late Seventeenth-Century England, In Habermas and the Public Sphere" 213-227,

      36 Dorothy Thompson, "Queen Victoria: The Woman, The Monarch and The People" 1990

      37 Judith Walkowitz, "Prostitution and Victorian Society: Women, Class and the State" 1980

      38 Judith Walkowitz, "Prostitution and Victorian Society" 81-82,

      39 Deborah Valenze, "Prophetic Sons and Daughters" 11-, 1985

      40 G. M. Young, "Portrait of an Age"

      41 Donna Andrew, "Popular Culture and Public Debate: London 1780" 39 (39): 410-414, 1996

      42 John Brewer, "Pleasures of Imagination: English Culture in the Eighteenth Century" 167-168, 2000

      43 Josephine Butler, "Personal Reminiscences of a Great Crusade" 18-19 18-19, 1896

      44 Rachel Harrison, "Patriarchal Aspects of Nineteenth-Century State Formation"

      45 F. Trentmann, "Paradoxes of Civil Society: New Perspectives on Modern German and British History" 2000

      46 Norton Rictor, "Mother Clap's Molly House: Gay Subculture in England 1700-1830" 1992

      47 Janet Todd, "Mary Wollstonecraft: Political Writings" 109-113, 1993

      48 Susan Staves, "Married Women's Separate Property in England 1660-1833" 4-5, 1990

      49 Mary Poovey, "Making A Social Body: British Cultural Formation 1830-1864" 1995

      50 Sonya Rose, "Limited Livelihood: Gender and Class in Nineteenth-Century England" 70-74, 1992

      51 Catherine Macaulay Graham, "Letters on Education with Observation on Religious and Metaphysical Subjects" 205-206, 1790

      52 "Letter to the Queen on Lord Chancellor Cranworth's Marriage and Divorce Bill"

      53 Robert Gray, "Languages of Factory Reform, c. 1830-c.1860, In Historical Meanings of Work" 143-179, 1830

      54 Jose Harris, "Introduction: Civil Society in British History: Paradigm orPeculiarity?, In Civil Society in British History: Ideas, Identities, Institutions" 1-2,

      55 Craig Calhoun, "Introduction, In Habermas and the Public Sphere" 33-38,

      56 Dror Wharman, "Imagining the Middle Class: The Political Representation of Class in Britain, c. 1780-1840" 1995

      57 Craig Calhoun, "Habermas and the Public Sphere" 1992

      58 Amanda Vickery, "Golden Age to Separate Spheres?: A Review of the Categories and Chronology of English Women's History" 36 (36): 383-414, 1993

      59 M. Glasius, "Global Civil Society" 2002

      60 H. C. G. Matthew, "Gladstone, vol.1, 1809-1874" 92-95, 1874

      61 Jonathan Fulcher, "Gender, Politics, and Gender in the Early Nineteenth -Century English Reform Movement" 67 (67): 57-74, 1994

      62 Randolph Trumbach, "Gender and the Homosexual Role in Modern Western Culture: The Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries Compared, In Which Homosexuality?" 149-169, 1989

      63 Jane Mark-Lawson, "From Family Labour to Family Wage?: The Case of Women's Labour in Nineteenth-Century Coal-Mining" 13 (13): 151-174, 1988

      64 John Gillis, "For Better, For Worse: British Marriages, 1600 to the Present" 140-141, 1985

      65 Mary Lyndon Shanley, "Feminism, Marriage and the Law in Victorian England, 1850-1895" 1993

      66 Mary Lyndon Shanley, "Feminism, Marriage and the Law in Victorian England, 1850-1895" 78-79, 1989

      67 Mary Lyndon Shanley, "Feminism, Marriage and the Law in Victorian England" 10-17, 74-76 1850-1895, 1895

      68 M. J. D. Roberts, "Feminism and the State in Later Victorian England" 31 (31): 96-104, 1995

      69 F. K. Brown, "Fathers of the Victorians" 1961

      70 Leonore Davidoff, "Family Fortunes: Men and Women of the English Middle Class,1780-1850" 1987

      71 Leonore Davidoff, "Family Fortunes" 114-118,

      72 Martha Vicinus, "Ever Your, Florence Nightingale: Selected Letters" 1990

      73 Barbara Taylor, "Eve and the New Jerusalem: Socialism and Feminism in the Nineteenth Century" 1983

      74 Ranajit Guha, "Dominance Without Hegemony and Its Historiography, In Subaltern Studies, vol.VI" Writings on South Asian History and Society 210-303, 1989

      75 J. Garrard, "Democratisation in Britain. Elites, Civil Society, and Reform in Britain Since1800" 2002

      76 Ruth Richardson, "Death, Dissection and the Destitute" 1988

      77 Barker-Benfield, "Culture of Sensibility" 389-391,

      78 "Complete Works of Hannah More, vol.I"

      79 J.Ehrenberg, "Civil Society: The Critical History of an Idea" 1999

      80 S. Kaviraj, "Civil Society: History and Possibilities" 2001

      81 J. A. Hall, "Civil Society. Theory, History, Comparison" 1995

      82 Jose Harris, "Civil Society in British History: Ideas, Identities, Institutions" 2005

      83 Olive Anderson, "Civil Marriage in Victorian England and Wales" (69) : 56-86, 1975

      84 Judith Walkowitz, "City of Dreadful Delight" 1993

      85 Judith Walkowitz, "City of Dreadful Delight" 1993

      86 George Behlmer, "Child Abuse and Moral Reform in England 1870-1914" 1-12, 1982

      87 Mary Ann Tétreault,, "Chapter II, The Public and the Private Realm, Frontier Politics: Sex, Gender, and the Deconstruction of the Public Spheres" 26 (26): 53-72, 2001

      88 Caroline Norton, "Caroline Norton's Defense" 1982

      89 Linda Colley, "Britons" 237-281,

      90 J. A. Cannon, "Aristocratic Century: The Peerage in Eighteenth-Century England" 73-92, 1984

      91 Denise Riley, "Am I That Name?:Feminism and the Category of “Women” in History" 1990

      92 Asa Briggs, "Age of Improvement, 1783-1867" 69-74 69-74, 1999

      93 Mary Astell, "A Serious Proposal to the Ladies for the Advancement of Their True and Greatest Interest" 1970

      94 Paul Langford, "A Polite and Commercial People" 109-116,

      95 Paul Langford, "A Polite and Commercial People" 109-116,

      96 Pearce Stevenson, "A Plain Letter to the Lord Chancellor on the Infant Custody Bill" 1839

      97 Standish Meacham, "A Life Apart: The English Working Class 1890-1914" 1977

      98 Bonnie Anderson, "A History of Their Own: Women in Europe from Prehistory to the Present vol.II" II 116-118, 1988

      99 Bonnie S. Anderson, "A History of Their Own" 138-140,

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-05-02 학회명변경 영문명 : A Laboratory of Korean Studies -> Institute of Korean Studies KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.3 0.3 0.23
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.36 0.38 0.553 0.14
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼