RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    敎育에 있어서 活動의 意味分析과 興味와 努力의 問題 = An Analysis of Activity and Interest and Effort in Education

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19653908

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The reconstruction in society without the distortion of human nature has been concerned on the history of education
    John Dewey thinks that interest and effort is continuum, and the distinction between interest and effort is not in quality, but in degree. This view has such a logical weakness as identification of true in part with true in whole. Bruner, in the relationship of interest and effort, assumes implicitly the necessity.
    Such a logical error is due to the conflicts between the causual point on interest and the normative point on effort.
    This paper is an attempt to reconcile both concepts, something incompatible overtly, by analysis of language 「activity in education」. Activity is our will, participating and enthusi astic. Therefore we become made the change into ours. Activity is problematic in a sense of the present. In order to solve the problem we do somethng with it, those of our remember or understanding. Activity is to let us translate the change into progress. Activity can be standardized by the universe and the objective truth. In other words, our activity can be stated as "though……bettlement." This statement is evidence that there are the universe and objective standard.
    Activity assumes the language of "puzzlement." Through this language we can discusse the authonomy and the voluntary in our activity. With such a analysis of activity we state 「if we had made up our mind, we shoulol have achieved」. We can reconcile both interest and effort by this statement. However, this statement has one difficult problem to have to solve in advance. It is the assumptions that "all is interesting and all be able to achieve. We can solve the problem by the possility of acitivity.
    Through such analysis some issues under scrutiny remain that is the relationships of "individuality and structure," tendency and logic, and student's duty and teacher's duty.
    번역하기

    The reconstruction in society without the distortion of human nature has been concerned on the history of education John Dewey thinks that interest and effort is continuum, and the distinction between interest and effort is not in quality, but in deg...

    The reconstruction in society without the distortion of human nature has been concerned on the history of education
    John Dewey thinks that interest and effort is continuum, and the distinction between interest and effort is not in quality, but in degree. This view has such a logical weakness as identification of true in part with true in whole. Bruner, in the relationship of interest and effort, assumes implicitly the necessity.
    Such a logical error is due to the conflicts between the causual point on interest and the normative point on effort.
    This paper is an attempt to reconcile both concepts, something incompatible overtly, by analysis of language 「activity in education」. Activity is our will, participating and enthusi astic. Therefore we become made the change into ours. Activity is problematic in a sense of the present. In order to solve the problem we do somethng with it, those of our remember or understanding. Activity is to let us translate the change into progress. Activity can be standardized by the universe and the objective truth. In other words, our activity can be stated as "though……bettlement." This statement is evidence that there are the universe and objective standard.
    Activity assumes the language of "puzzlement." Through this language we can discusse the authonomy and the voluntary in our activity. With such a analysis of activity we state 「if we had made up our mind, we shoulol have achieved」. We can reconcile both interest and effort by this statement. However, this statement has one difficult problem to have to solve in advance. It is the assumptions that "all is interesting and all be able to achieve. We can solve the problem by the possility of acitivity.
    Through such analysis some issues under scrutiny remain that is the relationships of "individuality and structure," tendency and logic, and student's duty and teacher's duty.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 序 論
    • Ⅱ. 問題의 設定
    • Ⅲ. 活動의 意味分析
    • Ⅳ. 興味와 努力의 關係論證
    • Ⅴ. 結論-남은문제
    • Ⅰ. 序 論
    • Ⅱ. 問題의 設定
    • Ⅲ. 活動의 意味分析
    • Ⅳ. 興味와 努力의 關係論證
    • Ⅴ. 結論-남은문제
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼