RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Second Language Accuracy Development Through Interaction in Video-Based Telecollaboration and Face-to-Face Contexts and Type of Assessment Task: A Curricular Approach

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107020283

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Despite the growing interest in the use of telecollaboration in higher education, little has been documented concerning the effects of interaction in video-based telecollaboration on L2 development in comparison with interaction in the traditional fac...

      Despite the growing interest in the use of telecollaboration in higher education, little has been documented concerning the effects of interaction in video-based telecollaboration on L2 development in comparison with interaction in the traditional face-to-face (FTF) environment. In addition, very few studies have succeeded in situating the research designs within the language curriculum for robust pedagogical ramifications in addition to addressing statistically performances obtained on different types of assessment tasks. As part of a larger research project on telecollaboration, this study investigated the relative effects of interaction in video-based telecollaboration (Teletandem) and FTF environments, embedded within language curriculum, on L2 oral accuracy development together with the possible role of the type of oral production assessment task in L2 accuracy development across time. Advanced-level learners of Spanish as a foreign language engaged in oral interaction either in Teletandem (with native speakers of Spanish) or in FTF (with nonnative speaker learners) environments six times during the course of one semester. L2 development was measured by a picture-description task and an opinion-stating task. Results showed that interaction both in Teletandem and FTF modes promoted L2 accuracy development over the six sessions, and the type of medium (and their inherent differences of interlocutor type) did not significantly affect L2 development. Furthermore, results indicated that learners achieved greater improvements on the opinion-stating task than on the picture-description task. These findings are discussed in light of research design issues, previous findings, and the need to seriously address the context of learning from a curricular perspective.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이준규, "작업기억, 주의, 교수법 및 학습에 의한 제2 언어습득" 외국어교육연구소 33 (33): 409-427, 2019

      2 Manchón, R. M., "Writing and language learning:Advancing research agendas" John Benjamins 336-355, 2020

      3 Saito, K., "Video-based interaction, negotiation for comprehensibility, and second language speech learning: A longitudinal study" 67 (67): 43-74, 2017

      4 Gass, S., "Theories in second language acquisition" Routledge 180-206, 2015

      5 Schmidt, R., "The role of consciousness in second language learning" 11 (11): 129-158, 1990

      6 Leow, R. P., "The effects of amount and type of exposure on adult learners' L2 development in SLA" 82 : 49-68, 1998

      7 Li, S., "The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis" 60 : 309-365, 2010

      8 Leow, R. P., "The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning" Routledge 485-493, 2019

      9 Lightbown, P., "Teaching and learning L2 in the classroom:It's about time" 1-11, 2019

      10 Kabata, K., "Tandem language learning through a cross-cultural Keypal project" 15 (15): 104-121, 2011

      1 이준규, "작업기억, 주의, 교수법 및 학습에 의한 제2 언어습득" 외국어교육연구소 33 (33): 409-427, 2019

      2 Manchón, R. M., "Writing and language learning:Advancing research agendas" John Benjamins 336-355, 2020

      3 Saito, K., "Video-based interaction, negotiation for comprehensibility, and second language speech learning: A longitudinal study" 67 (67): 43-74, 2017

      4 Gass, S., "Theories in second language acquisition" Routledge 180-206, 2015

      5 Schmidt, R., "The role of consciousness in second language learning" 11 (11): 129-158, 1990

      6 Leow, R. P., "The effects of amount and type of exposure on adult learners' L2 development in SLA" 82 : 49-68, 1998

      7 Li, S., "The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis" 60 : 309-365, 2010

      8 Leow, R. P., "The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning" Routledge 485-493, 2019

      9 Lightbown, P., "Teaching and learning L2 in the classroom:It's about time" 1-11, 2019

      10 Kabata, K., "Tandem language learning through a cross-cultural Keypal project" 15 (15): 104-121, 2011

      11 Russell, J., "Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching" John Benjamins 133-164, 2006

      12 Keck, C., "Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching" John Benjamins 91-132, 2006

      13 Ziegler, N., "Synchronous computer-mediated communication and interaction: A meta-analysis" 38 : 553-586, 2016

      14 VanPatten, B., "Second language acquisition: Theory and pedagogy" Erlbaum 169-185, 1995

      15 Derwing, T. M., "Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication" 42 : 476-490, 2009

      16 Helm, "Practices in intercultural language teaching and learning" Cambridge Scholars Publishing 131-144, 2017

      17 Ware, P., "Peer feedback on language form in telecollaboration" 12 (12): 43-63, 2008

      18 Lyster, R., "Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis" 32 (32): 265-302, 2010

      19 Leone, P., "Online intercultural exchange: Policy, pedagogy, practice" Routledge 241-247, 2016

      20 Bower, J., "Negotiation of meaning and corrective feedback in Japanese/English eTandem" 15 (15): 41-71, 2011

      21 Kötter, M., "Negotiation of meaning and codeswitching in online tandems" 7 (7): 145-172, 2003

      22 Foster, P., "Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons" 21 : 354-375, 2000

      23 Belz, J., "Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration" 7 : 68-117, 2003

      24 Caras, A., "Let’s pause for processing: Measuring accuracy or not, after filled pauses (FP)" 2016

      25 Lee, L., "Learners’ perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the US" 8 : 83-100, 2004

      26 구재명, "Input Types, Language Proficiency, and Working Memory" 외국어교육연구소 34 (34): 33-61, 2020

      27 Leow, R. P., "ISLA: How explicit or how implicit should it be? Theoretical, empirical, and pedagogical/curricular issues" 23 : 476-493, 2019

      28 Long, M. H., "Handbook of second language acquisition" Academic Press 413-468, 1996

      29 Shook, D. J., "FL/L2 reading, grammatical information, and the input-to-intake phenomenon" 5 (5): 57-93, 1994

      30 Martin, A., "Does working memory ‘work’ in Teletandem? A study on accuracy and complexity" 2016

      31 Cerezo, L., "Does the medium really matter in L2 development? The validity of CALL research designs" 27 (27): 294-310, 2014

      32 Akiyama, Y., "Development of comprehensibility and its linguistic correlates: A longitudinal study of video-mediated telecollaboration" 100 (100): 585-605, 2016

      33 Leow, R. P., "Deconstructing the “I” and “SLA” in ISLA:One curricular approach" 6 : 43-63, 2016

      34 Mackey, A., "Conversational interaction in second language" Oxford University Press 407-452, 2007

      35 Donate, A., "Cognitive task complexity, foreign language anxiety and task performance in L2 Spanish: A TBLT perspective" Georgetown University 2018

      36 Foster, P., "Capturing accuracy in second language performance: The case for a weighted clause ratio" 36 : 98-116, 2016

      37 Suh, B-R., "A psycholinguistic approach to technology and language learning" De Gruyter Mouton 69-83, 2016

      38 Leow, R. P., "A psycholinguistic approach to technology and language learning" De Gruyter Mouton 69-83, 2016

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.47 0.47 0.42
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.38 0.37 0.843 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼