RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    우리나라 지역복지의 회고와 전망: -지역사회복지전달체계를 중심으로- = Retrospect and Prospect on Local Community Cares in Korea : Focused on the Service Delivery Systems of Local Governments

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104622348

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Since 1995 institutional apparatus of decentralization of government have donecontinuously, but the results was not significant except for Presidency of RhoMoo Hyun, who did devolution and decentralization of government function fromcentral to local, for example, making the specialized decentralization law.
    According to Council of decentralization and devolution of government authorityand function, they handed over devolution of central governments’ works from2000 to 2008, but it is only small improvement and not connected withdecentralization reform. The Council could not hand over comprehensive devolutionof works and functions from central government to local government, because ofbudget and manpower problems. Furthermore former government of MBgovernment switched direction from decentralization reform to efficiency of localgovernment like reorganizing of local government administration, especially mergeof local government administration unit, for example Dong to Dong, Shi to Goon.
    And in 2003 our government revised Social Work Law for building communitywelfare council and making community welfare plan in local government. Itmeans people in community under the contexts that should participate in buildingand making process possibly. And it was also setting up network constructionamong the community service providers to aim for service integration incommunity levels. Actually it relates to make and rationalize service deliverysystem for community care. We have attempted community welfare office by2005, and did assistant agent for welfare and hope in MB government, formergovernment. And now we are focusing on hub of community care in localgovernment.
    So my study are focusing on analyzing government experiments for service delivery system of social services totally by 2013 and I intend to suggest newdirection for building service delivery system in community level. I am standingin institutional perspectives and organizational isomorphism for analyzing ourservice delivery system in community care.
    번역하기

    Since 1995 institutional apparatus of decentralization of government have donecontinuously, but the results was not significant except for Presidency of RhoMoo Hyun, who did devolution and decentralization of government function fromcentral to local, ...

    Since 1995 institutional apparatus of decentralization of government have donecontinuously, but the results was not significant except for Presidency of RhoMoo Hyun, who did devolution and decentralization of government function fromcentral to local, for example, making the specialized decentralization law.
    According to Council of decentralization and devolution of government authorityand function, they handed over devolution of central governments’ works from2000 to 2008, but it is only small improvement and not connected withdecentralization reform. The Council could not hand over comprehensive devolutionof works and functions from central government to local government, because ofbudget and manpower problems. Furthermore former government of MBgovernment switched direction from decentralization reform to efficiency of localgovernment like reorganizing of local government administration, especially mergeof local government administration unit, for example Dong to Dong, Shi to Goon.
    And in 2003 our government revised Social Work Law for building communitywelfare council and making community welfare plan in local government. Itmeans people in community under the contexts that should participate in buildingand making process possibly. And it was also setting up network constructionamong the community service providers to aim for service integration incommunity levels. Actually it relates to make and rationalize service deliverysystem for community care. We have attempted community welfare office by2005, and did assistant agent for welfare and hope in MB government, formergovernment. And now we are focusing on hub of community care in localgovernment.
    So my study are focusing on analyzing government experiments for service delivery system of social services totally by 2013 and I intend to suggest newdirection for building service delivery system in community level. I am standingin institutional perspectives and organizational isomorphism for analyzing ourservice delivery system in community care.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 안성수, "한국지방자치의 이해" 피앤씨미디어 2013

    2 신은주, "한국사회복지사론" 박영사 370-371, 1997

    3 김영종, "한국 사회서비스 공급체계의 역사적 경로와 쟁점, 개선 방향" 한국보건사회연구원 32 (32): 41-76, 2012

    4 양재진, "한국 복지정책 60년: 발전주의 복지체제의 형성과 전환의 필요성" 한국행정학회 42 (42): 327-349, 2008

    5 류진석, "지역복지거버넌스의 가능성과 한계: 대전광역시 무지개프로젝트를 중심으로" 사회과학연구소 22 (22): 115-135, 2011

    6 지방이양추진위원회, "지방이양백서 10년" 2008

    7 최재성, "이명박(MB)정부의 사회복지정책 특성과 과제: '친기업 보수우익'에서 '친서민 중도실용'" 사회복지연구소 25 : 1-29, 2010

    8 이광석, "우리나라 지역사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 - 영국의 지역사회복지 전달체계에 비추어 -" 한국지방자치학회 21 (21): 109-134, 2009

    9 김영종, "사회복지행정" 학지사 2010

    10 조흥식, "사회복지학개론" 창지사 2013

    1 안성수, "한국지방자치의 이해" 피앤씨미디어 2013

    2 신은주, "한국사회복지사론" 박영사 370-371, 1997

    3 김영종, "한국 사회서비스 공급체계의 역사적 경로와 쟁점, 개선 방향" 한국보건사회연구원 32 (32): 41-76, 2012

    4 양재진, "한국 복지정책 60년: 발전주의 복지체제의 형성과 전환의 필요성" 한국행정학회 42 (42): 327-349, 2008

    5 류진석, "지역복지거버넌스의 가능성과 한계: 대전광역시 무지개프로젝트를 중심으로" 사회과학연구소 22 (22): 115-135, 2011

    6 지방이양추진위원회, "지방이양백서 10년" 2008

    7 최재성, "이명박(MB)정부의 사회복지정책 특성과 과제: '친기업 보수우익'에서 '친서민 중도실용'" 사회복지연구소 25 : 1-29, 2010

    8 이광석, "우리나라 지역사회복지 전달체계에 관한 연구 - 영국의 지역사회복지 전달체계에 비추어 -" 한국지방자치학회 21 (21): 109-134, 2009

    9 김영종, "사회복지행정" 학지사 2010

    10 조흥식, "사회복지학개론" 창지사 2013

    11 정연택, "사회복지학개론" 양서원 2010

    12 강혜규, "사회복지전달체계의 현안과 전망" 한국보건사회연구원 2005

    13 박광덕, "사회복지개론" 박영사 1998

    14 박광덕, "사회복지개론" 삼영사 2002

    15 최일섭, "사회복지 전달체계와 사회복지사의 역할" 한국복지정책연구소 1987

    16 고수정, "복지행정분야 연구논문의 경향 분석: Network Text Analysis를 중심으로" 서울행정학회 24 (24): 211-234, 2013

    17 김영순, "노무현 정부의 복지정책 : 복지국가의 제도적·정치적 기반 형성 문제를 중심으로" 비판사회학회 (82) : 161-185, 2009

    18 Sedlak, Michael W, "Youth Policy and Young Women, 1950-1972: The Impact of Private-Sector Programs for Pregnant and Wayward Girls on Public Policy" 1991

    19 Hannan, Michael T, "The Population ecology of organizations" 82 : 929-964, 1977

    20 Powell, Walter W, "The New Institutionalism Organizational Analysis" University of Chicago Press 1991

    21 DiMaggio, P. J, "The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields" 48 (48): 147-160, 1983

    22 Milofsy, Carl., "Structure and Process in Community Self-Help Organizations" DiMaggio and Powell 1983

    23 Boyne, George, "Organizing Government" Sage Publication 2010

    24 Quinn, R.E, "Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence" 29 (29): 33-51, 1983

    25 Austin, Mike., "Organizational Histories of Pioneering Nonprofit Human Service OrganizatIon" Mack Center on Nonprofit Management in the Human Services 2009

    26 Aldrich, Howard., "Organizaitons and Environments" DiMaggio and Powell 1983

    27 Camerson,K.S, "Models of the organizational life cycle: Applications to higher education" 6 (6): 269-299, 1983

    28 Phelps, R., "Life cycles of growing organizations: A review with implications for knowledge and learning" 9 (9): 1-30, 2007

    29 Friedlander, Walter A., "Introduction to Social Welfare" Prentice-Hall 1980

    30 Meyer, J. W., "Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as myth and ceremony" 83 (83): 340-363, 1977

    31 Greiner, L. E., "Evolution and revolution as organizational grow" 76 (76): 55-68, 1998

    32 Gilbert, Neil, "Dimension of Social Welfare Policy" Prentice-Hall 1986

    33 Miller, D., "A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle" 30 (30): 1161-1183, 1984

    34 최재성, "2013년도 통합민주당 주최 복지전달체계 전문가 간담회 발표 원고"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.18 0.18 0.16
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.14 0.11 0.314 0.19
    더보기
    해외이동버튼