RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      임상전문간호사 운영 현황 및 역할 조사 = A Suvey on the Role and Present State of Advanced Practice Nurses in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A35492727

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: In this study, we investigated hospitals in Korea that comprised more than 400 beds and attempted to understand the present state of Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs and below) from 11 different fields (Diabetic education, Wound-Ostomy, Neurology, Neonatal, Cardiovascular, Oncology, Emergency, Organ-transplantation, Renal, Critical care, and Hospice). We also compared and determined the time spent on the role of each nurse from each field and the frequency of implementation for each work activity. Method: This study was conducted from July 2002 to May 2003. Data from 299 nurses that responded to the survey from 57 hospitals were analyzed with descriptive statistics, chi-square test and t-test using SPSS 10.0 program. Result: Out of 299 nurses that responded, 137 nurses from 35 hospitals were officially appointed as advanced practice nurses and assumed the duties of advanced nursing practice. The remainder of the nurses were not suitable to be classified as APNs. From the fields of neurology, cardiovascular and oncology, 25~31 APNs were found respectively, amounting up 63% in total. No APNs were found in the fields of critical care and renal. Mean percentage of time spent on each role was 42.8% for direct practice, 27.7% for education, 13.2% for consultation and coordination, 8.9% for research and 6.5% for administration. Amongst the work activities of all APNs, the activities that were most frequently implemented included reading of examination results, psychosocial assessment, consultation and education for the patients and their families, managing treatment, writing up patient records, history taking, consultation for nursing staff, physical examination and triage. Although not frequently performed, nurses in some fields carried out invasive procedures and prescribed medications or tests. Conclusion: Although the number of APNs are rapidly increasing in hospitals, there is yet confusion with regards to the title and classification of APNs, as well as the distribution of roles. Thus, there is an urgent need to establish a systematic framework as well as standards. Furthermore, because some nurses are prescribing medication for patients as well as performing techniques not traditionally handled by nurses, there is an absolute need for a legalized and systematic education system for the safety of patients who are being cared for by these nurses as well as all APNs.
      번역하기

      Purpose: In this study, we investigated hospitals in Korea that comprised more than 400 beds and attempted to understand the present state of Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs and below) from 11 different fields (Diabetic education, Wound-Ostomy, Neurolo...

      Purpose: In this study, we investigated hospitals in Korea that comprised more than 400 beds and attempted to understand the present state of Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs and below) from 11 different fields (Diabetic education, Wound-Ostomy, Neurology, Neonatal, Cardiovascular, Oncology, Emergency, Organ-transplantation, Renal, Critical care, and Hospice). We also compared and determined the time spent on the role of each nurse from each field and the frequency of implementation for each work activity. Method: This study was conducted from July 2002 to May 2003. Data from 299 nurses that responded to the survey from 57 hospitals were analyzed with descriptive statistics, chi-square test and t-test using SPSS 10.0 program. Result: Out of 299 nurses that responded, 137 nurses from 35 hospitals were officially appointed as advanced practice nurses and assumed the duties of advanced nursing practice. The remainder of the nurses were not suitable to be classified as APNs. From the fields of neurology, cardiovascular and oncology, 25~31 APNs were found respectively, amounting up 63% in total. No APNs were found in the fields of critical care and renal. Mean percentage of time spent on each role was 42.8% for direct practice, 27.7% for education, 13.2% for consultation and coordination, 8.9% for research and 6.5% for administration. Amongst the work activities of all APNs, the activities that were most frequently implemented included reading of examination results, psychosocial assessment, consultation and education for the patients and their families, managing treatment, writing up patient records, history taking, consultation for nursing staff, physical examination and triage. Although not frequently performed, nurses in some fields carried out invasive procedures and prescribed medications or tests. Conclusion: Although the number of APNs are rapidly increasing in hospitals, there is yet confusion with regards to the title and classification of APNs, as well as the distribution of roles. Thus, there is an urgent need to establish a systematic framework as well as standards. Furthermore, because some nurses are prescribing medication for patients as well as performing techniques not traditionally handled by nurses, there is an absolute need for a legalized and systematic education system for the safety of patients who are being cared for by these nurses as well as all APNs.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-04-15 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Clinical Nursing Research -> Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-07-31 학회명변경 한글명 : 임상간호사회 -> 병원간호사회
      영문명 : 미등록 -> Hospital Nurses Association
      KCI등재
      2005-05-27 학술지등록 한글명 : 임상간호연구
      외국어명 : Clinical Nursing Research
      KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.04 1.04 1.14
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.14 1.23 1.94 0.16
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼