RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      대중음악시상식 심사단 유형에 따른 효과 차이 = The Effect of Types of Jury in Popular Music Awards

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82490657

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Awards are general phenomenon in most industries. Awards provide the winners with money and fame or other benefits. More important, it may support a signal of quality which can be used as a marketing tool. Awards have an important role especially in the cultural industries, because cultural products are experiential goods and the quality of cultural products is evaluated subjectively. Experts and end consumers in cultural industries are known to make different evaluations on quality of cultural products, for their backgrounds and educational levels. We focus on popular music awards and build hypotheses that the composition of the jury is an important determinant of the effectiveness of awards. The hypotheses say that the image of awards will be greater when jury are composed of experts than the jury composed of general public, however, the attitude and purchase intension for winner songs will be higher when jury are composed of the public than the jury composed of expert. We design an experiment to test the hypotheses and 156 college students participated. The experimental result shows that the image of award is more positive when the award winner is selected by a jury composed of experts than when the awards winner is selected by a jury composed of end consumers. On the other hand, the attitude to winner song is more positive when the judges are general consumers than when judges are experts but the hypothesis about the purchase intension to winner song is not supported. This study has following contributions. First, it provides useful implications to award managers. The effect of awards is different depending on judges. It means that managers have to compose the right judges by the objective of awards. If an award seeks public confidence, the jury consisted of experts will be more effective, while judges composed of general consumers are more effective if the objective of awards is for attracting the interest of the public. Second, today the number of researches on cultural product is increasing, but many of them focus on visible phenomena, not causality, for instance why consumers in cultural industries behave differently. This study tries to provide theoretical explanation on the difference of experts and general public in cultural industries by sociological studies. Also, it has a theoretical contribution to advertising research. Many advertising studies premise the assumption that advertisement has effects on brand image and the brand image relates to purchase intention. However, our experimental result implies the other possibility: brand image is not positively correlated to the purchase intension in cultural industries. If it is, the advertising strategy of popular music or motion picture must be reconsidered. This study has a limitation: the finding cannot be generalized to the whole cultural product for it focuses on popular music awards. Consumers of popular music can be different from them of classical music or ballet: the latter is more likely to depend on experts` opinion for quality judgement. It is expected that further studies will test the hypotheses of this study in other cultural industries and identify the difference.
      번역하기

      Awards are general phenomenon in most industries. Awards provide the winners with money and fame or other benefits. More important, it may support a signal of quality which can be used as a marketing tool. Awards have an important role especially in t...

      Awards are general phenomenon in most industries. Awards provide the winners with money and fame or other benefits. More important, it may support a signal of quality which can be used as a marketing tool. Awards have an important role especially in the cultural industries, because cultural products are experiential goods and the quality of cultural products is evaluated subjectively. Experts and end consumers in cultural industries are known to make different evaluations on quality of cultural products, for their backgrounds and educational levels. We focus on popular music awards and build hypotheses that the composition of the jury is an important determinant of the effectiveness of awards. The hypotheses say that the image of awards will be greater when jury are composed of experts than the jury composed of general public, however, the attitude and purchase intension for winner songs will be higher when jury are composed of the public than the jury composed of expert. We design an experiment to test the hypotheses and 156 college students participated. The experimental result shows that the image of award is more positive when the award winner is selected by a jury composed of experts than when the awards winner is selected by a jury composed of end consumers. On the other hand, the attitude to winner song is more positive when the judges are general consumers than when judges are experts but the hypothesis about the purchase intension to winner song is not supported. This study has following contributions. First, it provides useful implications to award managers. The effect of awards is different depending on judges. It means that managers have to compose the right judges by the objective of awards. If an award seeks public confidence, the jury consisted of experts will be more effective, while judges composed of general consumers are more effective if the objective of awards is for attracting the interest of the public. Second, today the number of researches on cultural product is increasing, but many of them focus on visible phenomena, not causality, for instance why consumers in cultural industries behave differently. This study tries to provide theoretical explanation on the difference of experts and general public in cultural industries by sociological studies. Also, it has a theoretical contribution to advertising research. Many advertising studies premise the assumption that advertisement has effects on brand image and the brand image relates to purchase intention. However, our experimental result implies the other possibility: brand image is not positively correlated to the purchase intension in cultural industries. If it is, the advertising strategy of popular music or motion picture must be reconsidered. This study has a limitation: the finding cannot be generalized to the whole cultural product for it focuses on popular music awards. Consumers of popular music can be different from them of classical music or ballet: the latter is more likely to depend on experts` opinion for quality judgement. It is expected that further studies will test the hypotheses of this study in other cultural industries and identify the difference.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "해외 주요 대중음악차트 및 시상식 사례 연구" 한국콘텐츠진흥원 2009

      2 김용만, "제품유형에 따른 스포츠보증인의 속성이 광고효과에 미치는 영향" 한국방송광고공사 73 (73): 9-41, 2006

      3 김찬아, "정부기관의 이미지 측정 개념과 절차에 대한 탐색적 연구- 교육인적자원부를 대상으로" 한국방송광고공사 4 (4): 43-60, 2006

      4 아시아투데이, "유인촌 한국판 빌보드차트, 그래미상 만든다: 음악산업진흥 중기계획 발표"

      5 박형현, "영화 평론과 흥행 성과 간의 관계:인터넷 시대에도 유효한가?" 16 (16): 71-86, 2001

      6 김광수, "영화 선택 및 평가에 관한 연구" 48 : 139-164, 2000

      7 안성아, "영화 개봉점유율과 관객감소율의 영향 요인 분석" 한국마케팅학회 18 (18): 1-17, 2003

      8 김용만, "스포츠보증인 속성이 광고효과에 미치는 영향- 긍정적 정보유형을 중심으로" 한국방송광고공사 3 (3): 39-57, 2005

      9 Gemser, Gerda, "Why Some Awards Are More Effective Signals of Quality Than Others:A Study of Movie Awards" 34 (34): 25-54, 2008

      10 Dodds, John C., "What's an Oscar Worth? An Estimation of Effect of Nominations and Awards on Movie Distribution and Revenues, in Current Research in Film: Audiences, Economics and Law, 4" Ablex Publishing Co. 72-88, 1988

      1 "해외 주요 대중음악차트 및 시상식 사례 연구" 한국콘텐츠진흥원 2009

      2 김용만, "제품유형에 따른 스포츠보증인의 속성이 광고효과에 미치는 영향" 한국방송광고공사 73 (73): 9-41, 2006

      3 김찬아, "정부기관의 이미지 측정 개념과 절차에 대한 탐색적 연구- 교육인적자원부를 대상으로" 한국방송광고공사 4 (4): 43-60, 2006

      4 아시아투데이, "유인촌 한국판 빌보드차트, 그래미상 만든다: 음악산업진흥 중기계획 발표"

      5 박형현, "영화 평론과 흥행 성과 간의 관계:인터넷 시대에도 유효한가?" 16 (16): 71-86, 2001

      6 김광수, "영화 선택 및 평가에 관한 연구" 48 : 139-164, 2000

      7 안성아, "영화 개봉점유율과 관객감소율의 영향 요인 분석" 한국마케팅학회 18 (18): 1-17, 2003

      8 김용만, "스포츠보증인 속성이 광고효과에 미치는 영향- 긍정적 정보유형을 중심으로" 한국방송광고공사 3 (3): 39-57, 2005

      9 Gemser, Gerda, "Why Some Awards Are More Effective Signals of Quality Than Others:A Study of Movie Awards" 34 (34): 25-54, 2008

      10 Dodds, John C., "What's an Oscar Worth? An Estimation of Effect of Nominations and Awards on Movie Distribution and Revenues, in Current Research in Film: Audiences, Economics and Law, 4" Ablex Publishing Co. 72-88, 1988

      11 Nelson, Randy A., "What's an Oscar Worth?" 39 : 1-16, 2001

      12 Anand, N., "Tournament Rituals in the Evolution of Fields:the Case of the Grammy Awards" 47 (47): 59-80, 2004

      13 Holbrook, Morris B., "The Role of Ordinary Evaluations in the Market for Popular Culture:Do Consumers Have Good Taste?" 16 (16): 75-86, 2005

      14 MacKenzie, Scott. B., "The Role of Attitude-Towardthe-Ad in an Advertising Pretesting Context" 53 : 48-65, 1986

      15 Wallace, W. Timothy, "The Role of Actors and Actress in the Success of Film:How Much Is a Movie Star Worth?" 17 : 1-27, 1993

      16 Goldsmith, Ronald E., "The Impact of Corporate Credibility and Celebrity Credibility on Consumer Reaction to Advertisements and Brands" 29 (29): 43-54, 2000

      17 Goldberg, Marvin E., "The Effects of Advertiser Reputation and Extremity of Advertising Claim on Advertising Effectiveness" 17 (17): 172-179, 1990

      18 Burzynski, Michael H., "The Effect of Positive and Negative Prior Information on Motion Picture Appreciation" 101 : 215-218, 1977

      19 Dore, S., "Showbiz Ups Kudos Count, Variety"

      20 Hirschman, Elizabeth C., "Relationships Among Indicators of Success in Broadway Plays and Motion Pictures" 9 : 35-63, 1985

      21 Hendricks, Kevin B., "Quality Awards and the Market Value of the Firm:An Empirical Investigation" 42 : 415-436, 1996

      22 Nunnally, Jum, "Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed." McGraw-Hill 1978

      23 Hirsch, Paul M., "Processing Fads and Fashions:An Organizational Set Analysis of Cultural Industry Systems" 77 : 639-659, 1972

      24 Litman, Barry R., "Predicting Success of Theatrical Movies:An Empirical Study" 16 (16): 159-175, 1983

      25 Sochay, Scott, "Predicting Performance of Motion Pictures" 7 (7): 1-20, 1994

      26 Litman, Barry R., "Predicting Financial Success of Motion Pictures:The 80's Experience" 2 (2): 35-50, 1989

      27 Austin, Bruce A., "Portrait of an Art Film Audience" 34 : 74-87, 1984

      28 Holbrook, Morris B., "Popular Appeal versus Expert Judgments" 26 (26): 144-155, 1999

      29 Ginsburgh, Victor, "On the Perceived Quality of Movies" 23 : 269-283, 1999

      30 Nichols, Bill, "Movies and Methods" University of California Press 2 : 1985

      31 Nichols, Bill, "Movies and Methods" University of California Press 1 : 1976

      32 Bruner. Gordon C., "Marketing Scales Handbook" American Marketing Association 1 : 1992

      33 Levene, Caterrine, "Marketing Art-Films to College Student, working paper" Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 1992

      34 Eliashberg, Jehoshua, "MOVIEMOD:An Implementable Decision Support System for Prerelease Market Evaluation of Motion Pictures" 19 (19): 226-243, 2000

      35 Dore, S., "Kaboodle of Kudos in “00.” Variety"

      36 Mahajan, Vijey, "Introduction Strategy for New Products with Positive and Negative Word-of-Mouth" 30 : 1389-1404, 1984

      37 Wijnberg, Nachoem M., "Innovation and Organization:Value and Competitions in Selection System" 25 (25): 1469-1490, 2004

      38 Austin, Bruce A., "Immediate Seating: A Look at Movie Audiences" Wadsworth Publishing Company 1989

      39 Wyatt, Robert O., "How Reviews Affect Interest and Evaluation of Films" 61 : 874-878, 1984

      40 Basuroy, Suman, "How Critical Are Critical Reviews? The Box Office Effects of Film Critics,Star Power,and Budgets" 67 (67): 103-118, 2003

      41 Levine, Lawrence W., "Highbrow/Lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America" Harvard University Press 1988

      42 Deuchert, Eva, "For Oscar Glory or Oscar Money?" 29 : 159-176, 2005

      43 Eliashberg, Jehoshua, "Film Critics:Influencers or Predictors?" 61 (61): 68-78, 1997

      44 Austin, Bruce A., "Film Attendance:Why College Students Chose to See Their Most Recent Film" 9 : 43-49, 1981

      45 Machleit, Karen A., "Emotional Feelings and Attitudes Toward Advertisement:The Role of Brand Familiarity and Repetition" 17 (17): 27-35, 1988

      46 Wyatt, Robert O., "Effects of Information and Evaluation in Film Criticism" 67 (67): 1-27, 1990

      47 Atkin, Charles, "Effectiveness of Celebrity Endorsers" 23 (23): 57-61, 1983

      48 Faber, Roland J., "Effect of Media Advertising and Other Sources on Movie Selection" 61 : 371-377, 1984

      49 Holt, Douglas B., "Does Cultural Capital Structure American Consumption?" 25 (25): 1-25, 1998

      50 Bourdieu, Pierre, "Distinction" Harvard University Press 1984

      51 Ohanian, Roobina, "Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorsers’ Perceived Expertise,Trustworthiness,and Attractiveness" 19 (19): 39-52, 1990

      52 Keller, Kevin Lane, "Conceptualizing,Measuring,Managing Customer-based Perceptions" 57 (57): 1-22, 1993

      53 Hovland, Carl Iver, "Communication and Persuasion:Psychological Studies of Opinion Change" Yale University Press 1953

      54 Jedidi, Kamel, "Clustering at the Movies" 9 (9): 389-405, 1998

      55 Paleo, Ivan Orosa, "Classification of Popular Music Festival:A Typology of Festivals and An Inquiry into Their Role in the Construction of Music Genres" 8 (8): 50-81, 2006

      56 Keller, Kevin Lane, "Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity" Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1998

      57 Lampel, Joseph, "Balancing Act: Learning from Organizing Practices in Cultural Industries" 11 : 263-269, 2000

      58 Watson, Mary R., "Award Ceremony as an Arbiter of Commerce and Canon in the Popular Music industry" 25 (25): 41-56, 2006

      59 Holbrook, Morris B., "Audience Judgments as the Potential Missing Link Between Expert Judgments and Audience Appeal:An Illustration Based on Musical Recordings of"My Funny Valentine" 34 (34): 8-19, 2006

      60 Mitchell, Andrew A., "Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude?" 18 (18): 318-332, 1981

      61 Lee, Doo Hee, "An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Attitudes Towards Advertisement and Attitude Toward Brand Over Time" Michigan State University 1990

      62 Basuroy, Suman, "An Empirical Investigation of Signaling in the Motion Picture Industry" 43 (43): 287-295,

      63 Abelson, Robert P., "Affective and Semantic Components in Political Person Perception" 42 (42): 619-630, 1982

      64 Wijnberg, Nachoem M., "Adding Value to Innovation:Impression and the Transformation of the Selection system in Visual Arts" 11 : 323-329, 2000

      65 Priem, Richard L., "A Consumer Perspective on Value Creation" 32 : 219-235, 2007

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.48 1.48 1.67
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.7 1.88 2.351 0.15
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼