상품 및 서비스 혁신 : 국제물품매매계약에서의 서면요건에 대한 고찰: 미국계약법과 CISG 비교를 중심으로 = The Writing Requirement of Contracts for International Sales of Goods: the CISG and the US Laws

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper investigates the difference of writing requirements between the UCC2. and the UN convention on international sales of goods (CISG). To do it, the U.S writing requirement by statute of frauds was introduced by two sources of laws including common law and UCC§2-201. Although the U.S. statute of frauds requires some contract to be written with formalities, the way the requirement is satisfied is quite flexible in terms of its formalities. The UCC is more flexible than the common law in its formalities. The CISG does not require the sales contract to be written with any format, which is totally different from the U.S statue of frauds. Such differences between the U.S laws and CISG in writing requirement were investigated in the context of conflicts of laws.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정성헌, "서식충돌(Battle of the forms)의 해결에 관한 연구 - CISG, PICC, PECL, 미국UCC를 중심으로 -" 법학연구원 (60) : 285-315, 2011

2 석광현, "국제물품매매협약(CISG)과 國際私法" 법학연구소 50 (50): 235-284, 2009

3 조현숙, "국제물품매매계약에서 구두증거배제원칙의 유효성에 관한 연구 -CISG 및 PICC를 중심으로-" 한국산업경제학회 23 (23): 3371-3390, 2010

4 손태우, "국제물품매매계약에 관한 유엔협약(CISG)의 적용상의 통일성에 관한 최근 미국판례의 태도와 그 개선책에 관한 고찰" 47 (47): 399-423, 2006

5 김선국, "국제물품매매계약에 관한 유엔협약(CISG)과 구두증거배제의 원칙 - 미국 법원의 편결을 중심으로 -" 한국비교사법학회 9 (9): 485-22, 2002

6 김상만, "국제거래에서 CISG의 적용여부에 대해 다툼이 되는 몇 가지 사항에 대한 고찰" 법학연구소 20 (20): 205-234, 2012

7 "http://www.cisg-online.ch/cisg/urteile/145.htm"

8 "http://www.asialaw.com/Article/1972207/Channel/16965/Korea-Joins-the-International-Sale-of-Goods"

9 Claudia v. Olivieri Footwear Ltd, "WL 164824"

10 Multi-Juice, S.A., "WL 1519981"

11 Louis F, "IMPLEMENTATION OF CONTRACT FORMATION STATUTE OF FROUDS, FAROL EVIDENCE, AND BATTLE OF FORMS CISG PROVISIONS IN CIVIL AND COMMON LAW COUNTRIES" 25 : 133-146, 2005

12 하충룡, "CISG에서 청약에 관한 연구" 한국무역학회 36 (36): 297-323, 2011

13 김상만, "CISG에서 계약방식자유의 원칙 및 그 제한으로서 제12조에 대한 고찰" (3) : 1-18, 2012

14 Janet Walker, "AGREEING TO DISAGREE : CAN WE JUST HAVE WORDS? CISG ARTICLE II AND THE MODEL LAW REQUIREMENT" 25 : 153-165, 2005

15 Rossetti v., "87 F.Supp.2d 415 87 F.supp.2d 415"

16 Irish Oil and Gas, Inc. v. Riemer, "794 N.W.2d 715, 729"

17 Filanto S.p.A. v., "789 F. Supp. 1229, 1249"

18 Delchi Carrier SpA v, "71 F.3d 1024, 1028"

19 Gagne v. Stevens, "696 A.2d. 411, 416"

20 Cheesecake Company, Inc. v., "546 F.3d 839, 842 C.A.7"

21 Am. Biophysics Corp. v., "411 F.Supp.2d 61"

22 Dehahn v. Innes, "356 A.2d 711, Me"

23 Neary, "340 S.W.3d 578,584, Tex.App. -Dallas"

24 Donovan v., "27 P.3d 702, 713"

25 APEX LLC v, "206 Cal.App.4th 999"

26 Geneva Pharm. Tech. Corp. v., "201 F. Supp. 2d 236, 281"

27 Zhejiang Shaoxing Yongli Printing, "2008 WL 2098062"

28 MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc., "196 Md.App 318 340, Md.App."

29 Wintersport Ltd, "121 Wash App 1052"