RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    인공지능 윤리 국제공동연구 지식구조 네트워크 분석 = A Network Analysis of the Knowledge Structure of International Collaborative Research on Artificial Intelligence Ethics

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109799118

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    While the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has significantly improved human convenience and contributed to solving complex problems, it has also given rise to various social and ethical concerns, such as deepfakes, algorithmic bias, and privacy infringement. In response, major countries around the world have increased their focus on AI ethics to address the unintended consequences of AI development. Against this backdrop, the present study aims to examine the status of international collaborative research in the field of AI ethics. For empirical analysis, we utilized SCI-grade journal articles on AI ethics published in Scopus between 2018 and 2022, and applied the KDD/KM co-authorship method to conduct a network analysis of international collaboration. The centrality analysis revealed that the United States ranked highest in both the number of internationally co-authored publications and centrality indicators, demonstrating its pivotal role within the international collaboration network. Furthermore, the findings reveal that international collaborative research is largely concentrated among a limited number of countries in North America and Europe. In contrast, countries in Asia, including South Korea, still show relatively low levels of engagement in international AI ethics research. This study provides practical insights that can inform future strategies for fostering international cooperation and active participation in global discussions on AI ethics at the national policy level.
    번역하기

    While the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has significantly improved human convenience and contributed to solving complex problems, it has also given rise to various social and ethical concerns, such as deepfakes, algorithmic ...

    While the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has significantly improved human convenience and contributed to solving complex problems, it has also given rise to various social and ethical concerns, such as deepfakes, algorithmic bias, and privacy infringement. In response, major countries around the world have increased their focus on AI ethics to address the unintended consequences of AI development. Against this backdrop, the present study aims to examine the status of international collaborative research in the field of AI ethics. For empirical analysis, we utilized SCI-grade journal articles on AI ethics published in Scopus between 2018 and 2022, and applied the KDD/KM co-authorship method to conduct a network analysis of international collaboration. The centrality analysis revealed that the United States ranked highest in both the number of internationally co-authored publications and centrality indicators, demonstrating its pivotal role within the international collaboration network. Furthermore, the findings reveal that international collaborative research is largely concentrated among a limited number of countries in North America and Europe. In contrast, countries in Asia, including South Korea, still show relatively low levels of engagement in international AI ethics research. This study provides practical insights that can inform future strategies for fostering international cooperation and active participation in global discussions on AI ethics at the national policy level.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼