RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    의료기술과 보건정책: 기술 확산과 정책 대안 = Technology and Health Policy -Rapid Technology Diffusion and Policy Options in Korea-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75643140

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Medical technology has played an increasingly important role in health care. New high-tech medical devices, brand-name drugs and medical procedures contribute to better health outcomes and improved quality of life. At the same time, however, heavy reliance on high-technology medical care results in the increase in the intensity of care and health care expenditure. This paper reviews both theoretical issues associated with the diffusion of medical technology in general and the policy issues of Korea along with a few OECD countries. Korea has experienced a very rapid diffusion of high-tech medical care due to the perverse financial incentive of providers associated with the fee-for-service system, dominance of private for-profit providers of health care, and the lack of regulation on the adoption of medical technology. Since the rapid diffusion of medical technology is driven by providers rather than by consumers, public policy should focus on health care providers such as price regulation, payment system reform, planning and regulation of technology adoption, economic evaluation, and safety regulation. Effective strategy is also in need to minimize the social costs associated with the implementation of payment system reform and economic evaluation mechanism for medical technology, considering the opposition by vested interest groups.
    번역하기

    Medical technology has played an increasingly important role in health care. New high-tech medical devices, brand-name drugs and medical procedures contribute to better health outcomes and improved quality of life. At the same time, however, heavy rel...

    Medical technology has played an increasingly important role in health care. New high-tech medical devices, brand-name drugs and medical procedures contribute to better health outcomes and improved quality of life. At the same time, however, heavy reliance on high-technology medical care results in the increase in the intensity of care and health care expenditure. This paper reviews both theoretical issues associated with the diffusion of medical technology in general and the policy issues of Korea along with a few OECD countries. Korea has experienced a very rapid diffusion of high-tech medical care due to the perverse financial incentive of providers associated with the fee-for-service system, dominance of private for-profit providers of health care, and the lack of regulation on the adoption of medical technology. Since the rapid diffusion of medical technology is driven by providers rather than by consumers, public policy should focus on health care providers such as price regulation, payment system reform, planning and regulation of technology adoption, economic evaluation, and safety regulation. Effective strategy is also in need to minimize the social costs associated with the implementation of payment system reform and economic evaluation mechanism for medical technology, considering the opposition by vested interest groups.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Grabowski, "and price competition in pharmaceuticals after the 1984 drug act Journal of Law and Economics" 331-350, 1992

    2 Baumgardner, "The Interaction between Forms of Insurance Contract and Types of Technical Change in Medical Care Rand Journal of Economics" 36-53, 1991

    3 Kwon,S, "Pharmaceutical Reform and Physician Strikes in Korea Separation of Drug Prescribing and Dispensing" 57 (57): 529-538, 2003

    4 Bae,E, "Pharmaceutical Pricing in Korea, Korea Institute of Health and Social Affairs" 2001

    5 Danzon, P, "Pharmaceutical Price Regulation: National Policies versus Global Interests" Washington, DC, AEI Press 1997

    6 Davis,P, "Managing Medicines: Public Policy and Therapeutic Drugs" Philadelphia: Open University Press 1997

    7 Cutler, D, "Is Technological Change in Medicine Worth It?" 20 (20): 11-30, sep/oct2001

    8 Newhouse, "How Much Welfare Loss?' Journal of Economic Perspectives" 3-21, 1991

    9 Cutler,D, "Equality, Efficiency, and Market Fundamentals: The Dynamics of International Medical-Care Reform," XL : 881-906, 2002

    10 Koenig,H, "Diffusion of High-Cost Medical Devices Regulations in Four European Union Member States, Health Care and its Financing in the Single European Market" Amsterdam: IOS Press 150-166, 1998

    1 Grabowski, "and price competition in pharmaceuticals after the 1984 drug act Journal of Law and Economics" 331-350, 1992

    2 Baumgardner, "The Interaction between Forms of Insurance Contract and Types of Technical Change in Medical Care Rand Journal of Economics" 36-53, 1991

    3 Kwon,S, "Pharmaceutical Reform and Physician Strikes in Korea Separation of Drug Prescribing and Dispensing" 57 (57): 529-538, 2003

    4 Bae,E, "Pharmaceutical Pricing in Korea, Korea Institute of Health and Social Affairs" 2001

    5 Danzon, P, "Pharmaceutical Price Regulation: National Policies versus Global Interests" Washington, DC, AEI Press 1997

    6 Davis,P, "Managing Medicines: Public Policy and Therapeutic Drugs" Philadelphia: Open University Press 1997

    7 Cutler, D, "Is Technological Change in Medicine Worth It?" 20 (20): 11-30, sep/oct2001

    8 Newhouse, "How Much Welfare Loss?' Journal of Economic Perspectives" 3-21, 1991

    9 Cutler,D, "Equality, Efficiency, and Market Fundamentals: The Dynamics of International Medical-Care Reform," XL : 881-906, 2002

    10 Koenig,H, "Diffusion of High-Cost Medical Devices Regulations in Four European Union Member States, Health Care and its Financing in the Single European Market" Amsterdam: IOS Press 150-166, 1998

    11 Danzon, P, "Cross-national price difference for pharmaceuticals: How large and why?" 19 (19): 159-195, 2000

    12 Finkler, "Cost Accounting for Health Care Organizations" 1993

    13 Lichtenberg, F, "Are the benefits of newer drugs worth their costs? Evidence from the 1996 MEPS" 20 (20): 241-252, sep/oct2001

    14 Weisbrod, "AN Essay on Technological Change Quality of Care Journal of Economic Literature" 523-552, 1991

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-09-15 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Association of Health Economics Policy -> The Korean Association of Health Economics and Policy KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.66 0.66 0.76
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.74 0.68 1.153 0.64
    더보기

    연관 공개강의(KOCW)

    해외이동버튼