RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    보육교사의 아동학대에 관한 인식 연구 = Day care Teachers' Awareness of Child Abuse

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45027682

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to determine daycare teachers' level of child abuse awareness. Surveys were given to 253 subjects, including student teachers and currently employed daycare teachers in city G. The survey consisted of 78 questions, covering topics that include child abuse basics, education, services, and the importance of reporting child abuse cases. The completed surveys were then analyzed with SPSS Krean 7.5, calculating the average, standard deviation, and frequency. The Scheffe test was used to further analyze the results. The analysis demonstrated that the currently employed teachers had less awareness on child abuse compared to their supervisors and student teachers. Among the subjects only 21.7% had encountered abused children during the past year.
    Most of these teachers answered that they have treated the abused children kindly with extra attention(45.9%), while 15.5% admitted to have ignored the situation. Also, 43% were aware of the existence of private institutions that handle child abuse cases, while only 28.5% knew about the Center for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect (CPCAN/1391), a government agency commissioned by recently established child-abuse laws. While the latest measure of awareness of CPCAN(28.5%) was higher than what has been reported in the previous study (Chong Chae-ok, 2002), more than 70% still did not know such an establishment even exists.
    Finally, 96.8% expressed interest in educational programs to increase the awareness of child abuse and related matters, including the work done at child abuse prevention centers and educating parents.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to determine daycare teachers' level of child abuse awareness. Surveys were given to 253 subjects, including student teachers and currently employed daycare teachers in city G. The survey consisted of 78 questions, coveri...

    The purpose of this study was to determine daycare teachers' level of child abuse awareness. Surveys were given to 253 subjects, including student teachers and currently employed daycare teachers in city G. The survey consisted of 78 questions, covering topics that include child abuse basics, education, services, and the importance of reporting child abuse cases. The completed surveys were then analyzed with SPSS Krean 7.5, calculating the average, standard deviation, and frequency. The Scheffe test was used to further analyze the results. The analysis demonstrated that the currently employed teachers had less awareness on child abuse compared to their supervisors and student teachers. Among the subjects only 21.7% had encountered abused children during the past year.
    Most of these teachers answered that they have treated the abused children kindly with extra attention(45.9%), while 15.5% admitted to have ignored the situation. Also, 43% were aware of the existence of private institutions that handle child abuse cases, while only 28.5% knew about the Center for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect (CPCAN/1391), a government agency commissioned by recently established child-abuse laws. While the latest measure of awareness of CPCAN(28.5%) was higher than what has been reported in the previous study (Chong Chae-ok, 2002), more than 70% still did not know such an establishment even exists.
    Finally, 96.8% expressed interest in educational programs to increase the awareness of child abuse and related matters, including the work done at child abuse prevention centers and educating parents.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
    • Ⅲ. 연구방법
    • Ⅳ. 연구결과
    • Ⅴ. 결론 및 논의
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
    • Ⅲ. 연구방법
    • Ⅳ. 연구결과
    • Ⅴ. 결론 및 논의
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 2.04 2.04 2.16
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.02 1.95 2.428 0.72
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼