지역사회 문제 해결을 위한 산업혁신유형과 도시형 리빙랩(Urban Living)에 관한 연구 = Research on Industrial Innovation Types and Urban Living Labs to solve Community Problems

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Recently, as globalization has accelerated and social changes have deepened, the importance of establishing effective policies to solve social problems has been emphasized. Accordingly, various industrial innovation models, such as user-centered innovation, open innovation, and design innovation, are being presented as a means of solving social problems. In particular, since the concept of Living Lab was introduced in Korea in 2014, Living Lab complements existing innovation models and presents a new direction for solving major social problems at the national level. Existing research and development models show limitations in bringing about real improvements in life and social system innovation. On the other hand, living labs show the possibility of solving problems and building new social and technological systems through direct participation of users in real life. Living Lab is an open innovation model in which users directly participate within the community, and its value is recognized and its scope of use is expanding.
In this study, the correlation and differentiation between new industrial innovation models, including living labs, were analyzed based on previous research. The characteristics and potential of living labs were explored by comparing them with the three existing major industrial innovation models (user innovation, open innovation, design innovation, etc.). Despite the relatively short period since living labs were introduced in Korea, they are playing an important role in solving community problems. Through this analysis, this study sought the possibility of solving social problems through living labs, and based on this, sought to develop more developed industrial innovations and improvement plans and discourses on living labs.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Bajgier, S. M., 39 (39): 698-863, 1991

2 배영임, "지역혁신 활성화를 위한 리빙랩 활용방안" 경기연구원 2019

3 박소임 ; 장수정, "지역사회 문제 해결을 위한 시민참여형 공공주도 리빙랩 운영사례 및 성과분석 기반 스마트 환기 시스템을 통한 ICT경로당 실내 공기질 개선효과 및 사용자 만족도를중심으로" 21 (21): 89-97, 2021

4 성지은 ; 한규영 ; 정서화, "지역문제 해결을 위한 국내 리빙랩 사례 분석, 과학기술학연구" 16 (16): 65-98, 2016

5 김은영 ; 최창범, "중소도시의 혁신모델로서 리빙랩 추진 사례에 관한 연구" 10 (10): 779-791, 2019

6 손지윤, "제품 디자인과 소비자 참여가 NPD 프로세스에 미치는 영향 : 문헌연구를 중심으로" 4 (4): 2013

7 정현준, "유럽의 Open Innovation 전략" 정보통신정책연구원 42-49, 2013

8 안치수 ; 이영덕, "우리나라 개방형 혁신활동의 영향요인에 관한 실증분석 연구" 14 (14): 431-465, 2011

9 장환영 ; 김걸, "스마트시티 리빙랩의 사업적 쟁점과 대응 방안" 23 (23): 45-57, 2020

10 임호, "사회혁신 도구, 리빙랩 이용 활성화 방안" (315) : 1-12, 2016

11 성지은, "사회문제 해결형 R&D 활성화를 위한 리빙랩 확산방안 연구" 과학기술정책연구원 2020

12 송위진, "사회문제 해결을 위한 과학기술혁신정책" 한울 2013

13 박주현 ; 류한영, "사용자 혁신성 기반의 디자인 중심 혁신성 요인 분석" 53 (53): 355-364, 2012

14 김영배, "사용자 혁신과 기술혁신 시스템" 과학기술정책연구원 2008

15 성지은 ; 송위진 ; 박인용, "사용자 주도형 혁신모델로서 리빙랩 사례 분석과 적용 가능성 탐색" 17 (17): 309-333, 2014

16 성지은, "사용자 주도형 혁신 모델로서 ICT 리빙랩 사례 분석과 시사점" 교육과학기술부 2011

17 성지은, "리빙랩의 운영체계와 사례" 과학기술정책연구원 (127) : 2013

18 김희대 ; 김수진 ; 임정택, "리빙랩기반 스마트 시티서비스 모델링을 통한 도시혁신플랫폼구축방법론에 관한 연구" 45 (45): 890-898, 2020

19 남고은, "디자인혁신지수(DII)개발을 위한 기초연구" 2013

20 김준환 ; 이항, "디자인 전형성과 지각된 제품 혁신성이 소비자의 제품 태도 및 구매의도에 미치는 영향" 18 (18): 95-89, 2012

21 김은지 ; 박영일, "도시재생 리빙랩 평가지표 개발에 관한 연구" 31 (31): 17-43, 2019

22 한규영, "도시리빙랩의 주요 특성 및 필수 구성요소 도출에 대한 연구" 363-372, 2019

23 이경, "기업의 디자인 경영이 디자인 혁신활동에 미치는 영향" 22 (22): 2009

24 성지은, "국내 리빙랩의 현황과 과제" 과학기술정책연 (184) : 2016

25 성지은, "국내 리빙랩 현황 분석과 발전 방안 연구" 과학기술정책연구원 2017

26 김석관, "개방형 혁신의 산업별 특성과 시사점" 과학기술정책연구원 2008

27 김성홍, "개방형 기술혁신을 위한 산업별 혁신네트워크 구축전략수립" 과학기술정책연구원 2007

28 Lakhani, K. R., "Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects"

29 Nevens, F., "Urban transition labs : co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities" 50 (50): 111-122, 2013

30 Buhr, K., "Urban living labs for sustainability in suburbs in need of modernization and social uplift" 6 (6): 27-34, 2016

31 Voytenko, Y., "Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe : towards a research agenda" 123 : 45-54, 2016

32 Menny, M., "Urban living labs and the role of users in co-creation" 27 (27): 68-77, 2018

33 Chroneer, D., "Urban living labs : towards an integrated understanding of their key components" 9 (9): 50-62, 2019

34 Karvonen, A., "Urban laboratories : experiments in reworking cities" 38 (38): 379-392, 2014

35 AMS Institute., "Urban Living Labs: A Living Lab Way of Working" AMS Institute 2017

36 JPI Urban Europe., "Transition Towards Sustainable and Liveable Urban Futures: The Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda of Urban Europe"

37 United Nations, "Transforming Our World : The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development"

38 Cuomo, F., "Transformative urban living labs : towards a circular economy in Amsterdam and Turin" 12 (12): 7651-7670, 2020

39 Gassmann, "Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes" 2004

40 Baccarne, B., "The role of urban living labs in a smart city" 1-16, 2014

41 von Hippel, E., "The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process" 5 : 212-239, 1976

42 Schliwa, G., "The Experimental City" Routledge 163-178, 2018

43 Evans, J., "The Experimental City" Routledge 1-12, 2018

44 Marvin, S., "The Experimental City" Routledge 47-60, 2018

45 McCormick, K., "The Emerging Landscape of Urban Living Labs:Characteristics, Practices and Examples"

46 Ballon, P., "Test and experimentation platforms for broadband innovation: examining European practice" 2005

47 von Hippel, E., "Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving : Implications for Innovation" 40 (40): 429-439, 1994

48 Eriksson, M., "State-of-the-Art in Utilizing Living Labs Approach to User-centric ICT innovation: a European approach" CDT at Luleå University of Technology, Centre for Knowledge and Innovation Research at Helsinki Scholl of Economics 2005

49 Federley, M., "Report 2.1 Boundary Conditions for Successful Urban Living Labs" SubUrbanLab 2014

50 Federley, M., "Report 2.1 Boundary Conditions for Successful Urban Living Labs" SubUrbanLab 2014

51 Chesbrough, H. W., "Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology" Harvard Business School Press 2003

52 Chesbrough, H. W., "Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm" Oxford University Press 1-12, 2006

53 Vrande, V., "Open Innovation in SMEs : Trends, motives and management challenges" 29 : 423-437, 2009

54 Leminen, S., "Living labs as open innovation networks" 2 (2): 6-11, 2012

55 Almirall, E., "Living labs : arbiters of mid-and ground-level innovation" 23 (23): 87-102, 2011

56 Leminen, S, "Living Labs as Open Innovation Networks: Networks, Roles and Innovation Outcomes" Aalto University. 2015

57 송위진, "Living Lab: 사용자 주도의 개방형 혁신모델" 과학기술정책연구원 (59) : 2012

58 Franke, N., "How communities support innovative activities : an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users" 32 : 157-178, 2003

59 Schreier, M., "Extending lead user theory : Antecedents and consequences of consumers' lead userness" 25 (25): 331-346, 2008

60 Kronsell, A., "Experimental governance : the role of municipalities in urban living labs" 26 (26): 988-1007, 2018

61 Feurstein K., "European Living Labs - A New Approach for Human Centric Regional Innovation" Wissenschaftlicher Verlag 1-14, 2008

62 Eurbanlab, "Eurbanlab innovation case inventory template, version 3.4"

63 Juujaervi, S., "Enhancing early innovation in an urban living lab : lessons from Espoo, Finland" 6 (6): 17-26, 2016

64 Rittel, H. W. J., "Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning" 4 : 155-169, 1973

65 Verganti, R, "Design, Meanings, and Radical Innovation : A Metamodel and a Reserach Agenda" 25 (25): 436-456, 2008

66 von Hippel, E., "Democratizing Innovation" MIT Press 2005

67 DIT, "Competing in the Global Economy, The Innovation Challenge" 2003

68 Nesti, G., "Co-production for innovation : the urban living lab experience" 37 (37): 310-325, 2018

69 McCormick, K., "Advancing sustainable urban transformation" 50 : 1-11, 2013

70 Juujaervi, S., "Actor roles in an urban living lab : what can we learn from Suurpelto, Finland?" 3 (3): 22-27, 2013

71 ENoLL, "About Us"

72 Bergvall-Kaereborn, B., "A milieu for innovation: defining living labs" 2009

73 Kumma, V., "101 Design Methods: A Structured Approach for Driving Innovation in Your Organization" John Wiley & Sons 2012

74 Evans, J., "'Give me a laboratory and I will lower your carbon footprint!' -urban laboratories and the governance of low-carbon futures" 38 (38): 413-430, 2014