RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      In vivo assessment of accuracy of Propex II, Root ZX II, and radiographic measurements for location of the major foramen

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103385384

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objectives: The aim of this in vivo study was to assess the accuracy of 2 third-generation electronic apex locators (EALs), Propex II (Dentsply Maillefer) and Root ZX II (J. Morita), and radiographic technique for locating the major foramen (MF). Mat...

      Objectives: The aim of this in vivo study was to assess the accuracy of 2 third-generation electronic apex locators (EALs), Propex II (Dentsply Maillefer) and Root ZX II (J. Morita), and radiographic technique for locating the major foramen (MF).
      Materials and Methods: Thirty-two premolars with single canals that required extraction were included. Following anesthesia, access, and initial canal preparation with size 10 and 15 K-flex files and SX and S1 rotary ProTaper files, the canals were irrigated with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. The length of the root canal was verified 3 times for each tooth using the 2 apex locators and once using the radiographic technique. Teeth were extracted and the actual WL was determined using size 15 K-files under a × 25 magnification. The Biostat 4.0 program (AnalystSoft Inc.) was used for comparing the direct measurements with those obtained using radiographic technique and the apex locators. Pearson's correlation analysis and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for statistical analyses.
      Results: The measurements obtained using the visual method exhibited the strongest correlation with Root ZX II (r = 0.94), followed by Propex II (r = 0.90) and Ingle's technique (r = 0.81; p < 0.001). Descriptive statistics using ANOVA (Tukey's post hoc test) revealed significant differences between the radiographic measurements and both EALs measurements (p < 0.05).
      Conclusions: Both EALs presented similar accuracy that was higher than that of the radiographic measurements obtained with Ingle's technique. Our results suggest that the use of these EALs for MF location is more accurate than the use of radiographic measurements.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Tsesis I, "The precision of electronic apex locators in working length determination: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature" 41 : 1818-1823, 2015

      2 Dummer PM, "The position and topography of the apical canal constriction and apical foramen" 17 : 192-198, 1984

      3 Ponce EH, "The cemento-dentino-canal junction, the apical foramen, and the apical constriction: evaluation by optical microscopy" 29 : 214-219, 2003

      4 Kobayashi C, "New electronic canal measuring device based on the ratio method" 20 : 111-114, 1994

      5 Kuttler Y, "Microscopic investigation of root apexes" 50 : 544-552, 1955

      6 Siqueira JF Jr, "Incidence of postoperative pain after intracanal procedures based on an antimicrobial strategy" 28 : 457-460, 2002

      7 Somma F, "In vivo accuracy of three electronic root canal length measurement devices: Dentaport ZX, Raypex 5 and ProPex II" 45 : 552-556, 2012

      8 Guise GM, "In vitro comparison of three electronic apex locators" 36 : 279-281, 2010

      9 de Vasconcelos BC, "Ex vivo evaluation of the accuracy of electronic foramen locators in root canals with an obstructed apical foramen" 41 : 1551-1554, 2015

      10 Plotino G, "Ex vivo accuracy of three electronic apex locators: Root ZX, Elements Diagnostic Unit and Apex Locator and ProPex" 39 : 408-414, 2006

      1 Tsesis I, "The precision of electronic apex locators in working length determination: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature" 41 : 1818-1823, 2015

      2 Dummer PM, "The position and topography of the apical canal constriction and apical foramen" 17 : 192-198, 1984

      3 Ponce EH, "The cemento-dentino-canal junction, the apical foramen, and the apical constriction: evaluation by optical microscopy" 29 : 214-219, 2003

      4 Kobayashi C, "New electronic canal measuring device based on the ratio method" 20 : 111-114, 1994

      5 Kuttler Y, "Microscopic investigation of root apexes" 50 : 544-552, 1955

      6 Siqueira JF Jr, "Incidence of postoperative pain after intracanal procedures based on an antimicrobial strategy" 28 : 457-460, 2002

      7 Somma F, "In vivo accuracy of three electronic root canal length measurement devices: Dentaport ZX, Raypex 5 and ProPex II" 45 : 552-556, 2012

      8 Guise GM, "In vitro comparison of three electronic apex locators" 36 : 279-281, 2010

      9 de Vasconcelos BC, "Ex vivo evaluation of the accuracy of electronic foramen locators in root canals with an obstructed apical foramen" 41 : 1551-1554, 2015

      10 Plotino G, "Ex vivo accuracy of three electronic apex locators: Root ZX, Elements Diagnostic Unit and Apex Locator and ProPex" 39 : 408-414, 2006

      11 Ingle JI, "Endodontics" Lea & Febiger 179-, 1976

      12 Parente LA, "Efficacy of electronic foramen locators in controlling root canal working length during rotary instrumentation" 26 : 547-551, 2015

      13 Kara Tuncer A, "Effect of working length measurement by electronic apex locator or digital radiography on postoperative pain: a randomized clinical trial" 40 : 38-41, 2014

      14 Khandewal D, "Comparative evaluation of accuracy of 2 electronic Apex locators with conventional radiography: an ex vivo study" 41 : 201-204, 2015

      15 Martins JN, "Clinical efficacy of electronic apex locators: systematic review" 40 : 759-777, 2014

      16 Ricucci D, "Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 1. literature review" 31 : 384-393, 1998

      17 Kim E, "An in vivo comparison of working length determination by only root-ZX apex locator versus combining root-ZX apex locator with radiographs using a new impression technique" 105 : e79-e83, 2008

      18 Real DG, "Accuracy of working length determination using 3 electronic apex locators and direct digital radiography" 111 : e44-e49, 2011

      19 Vasconcelos BC, "Accuracy of five electronic foramen locators with different operating systems: an ex vivo study" 21 : 132-137, 2013

      20 Haffner C, "Accuracy of electronic apex locators in comparison to actual length--an in vivo study" 33 : 619-625, 2005

      21 Schneider SW, "A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals" 32 : 271-275, 1971

      22 Pagavino G, "A SEM study of in vivo accuracy of the Root ZX electronic apex locator" 24 : 438-441, 1998

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.25 0.25 0.21
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.21 0.19 0.448 0.1
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼