강의평가에 대한 온라인대학 학습자의태도 건전성 및 평정성향 탐색 = ntegrity of Attitudes and Rating Tendencies of Online University Learners in Student Evaluation of Teaching

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Student evaluation of teaching at universities provides useful information for feedback and administrative decisions related to courses. However, as student evaluation of teaching is not based on the sincere responses of learners and is influenced by characteristics irrelevant to courses, doubts about validity and reliability of the results arose recently. This study explored integrity of attitudes and rating tendencies of online university learners in student evaluation of teaching and analyzed the existence and causes of consistent rating tendency.
To accomplish the purposes, the researchers administered a survey to 187 online university learners and conducted two focus group interviews. The results are as follows. First, the participants showed the highest score in ‘consideration’ and the lowest in ‘autonomy’ among the 4 subcategories of integrity of attitudes. Various meaningful opinions on the subcategories were found in the interviews. Second, the level of integrity of attitudes was found to be related to the rating tendencies of the participants. Particularly, consistent rating showed a negative correlation with integrity of attitudes and, consequently, consistent rating tendencies can be interpreted as a result of insincere responses. However, qualitative results indicated that the tendencies could be a result of consideration rather than insincere attitude. Third, causes of consistent rating tendencies were found to be internal and external. This study was meaningful in that it observed student evaluation of teaching in detail by analyzing quantitative and qualitative data synthetically.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김창숙, "치위생과 학생들의 강의평가에 관한 인식 조사" 한국치위생학회 14 (14): 59-65, 2014

2 김학일, "이공계 강의평가 결과의 실증적 분석을 통한 강의평가제도 개선방안" 한국공학교육학회 10 (10): 58-77, 2007

3 김석호, "응답자의 성격특성과 응답스타일" 한국조사연구학회 12 (12): 51-76, 2011

4 최보금, "위계적 선형모형을 활용한 대학생 강의평가 관련 요인 탐색 : 무성의 응답의 영향을 중심으로" 한국열린교육학회 21 (21): 77-100, 2013

5 백순근, "위계선형모형을 활용한 대학생의 강의평가 분석 - S대학교 교양강의를 중심으로 -" 한국교육평가학회 21 (21): 1-24, 2008

6 이의길, "온라인대학 학습자의 평정성향이 강의평가 결과에 미치는 영향" 한국컴퓨터교육학회 19 (19): 55-66, 2016

7 정한호, "대학에서 이루어지는 강의평가의 응답 건전성 및 만족도에 대한 대학생 인식 탐색" 한국교육방법학회 28 (28): 443-470, 2016

8 홍경선, "대학교 강의평가에 나타난 일관적 응답 분석" 한국교육정보미디어학회 12 (12): 97-127, 2006

9 박인우, "대학 강의평가에서의 무성의 응답에 대한 학생의 자기평가의 영향에 관한 연구" 한국교육방법학회 24 (24): 257-281, 2012

10 양길석, "대학 강의평가 영향 요인에 대한 메타 연구" 한국교육방법학회 26 (26): 293-322, 2014

11 임시혁, "교대 학생들의 강의평가에 대한 태도 및 인식" 50 (50): 129-140, 2013

12 한경수, "강제적인 대학 강의평가의 문제점" 한국통계학회 18 (18): 35-45, 2011

13 오숙영, "강의평가점수 영향력 요인에 대한 사후조정 연구" 한국교육평가학회 28 (28): 1225-1254, 2015

14 하오선, "강의평가 응답분석을 통한 강의평가도구 개선방안 - D대학 강의평가 사례를 중심으로 -" 한국열린교육학회 22 (22): 273-294, 2014

15 김명랑, "강의평가 응답 태도 건전성 측정도구 개발" 한국교육정보미디어학회 19 (19): 765-784, 2013

16 Beck, L. C., "Using focus group sessions before decisions are made" 47 : 73-74, 1986

17 Campbell, J. P., "The value of student ratings : Perceptions of students, teachers, and administrators" 32 (32): 13-24, 2008

18 Beran, T., "The utility of student ratings of instruction for students, faculty, and administrators : A"consequential validity"study" 35 (35): 49-70, 2005

19 Spooren, P., "Students’perceptions of a teaching evaluation process and their relationships with SET scores" 54 : 43-49, 2017

20 Madden, T. J., "Students’evaluation of teaching : Concerns of item diagnosticity" 32 (32): 264-274, 2010

21 Chen, Y., "Student evaluation of teaching effectiveness : An assessment of student perception and motivation" 28 (28): 71-88, 2003

22 Wachtel, H. K., "Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness : A brief review" 23 (23): 191-212, 1998

23 Gravestock, P., "Student course evaluations:Research, models and trends" Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario 2008

24 Baumgartner, H., "Response styles in marketing research : A cross-national investigation" 38 (38): 143-156, 2001

25 Krosnick, J. A., "Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys" 5 (5): 213-236, 1991

26 Cronbach, L. J., "Response sets and test validity" 6 (6): 475-494, 1946

27 Naemi, B. D., "Personality predictors of extreme response style" 77 (77): 261-286, 2009

28 Spooren, P., "On the validity of student evaluation of teaching" 83 (83): 598-642, 2013

29 White, C. A., "Meta-analysis of faculty's teaching effectiveness : Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related" 54 : 22-42, 2017

30 Paulhus, D. L., "Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes" Academic Press 17-59, 1991

31 Bagozzi, R. P., "Measurement in marketing research : Basic principles of questionnaire design" 1 : 1-49, 1994

32 Alvarez, R. M., "Hard choices, easy answers: Values, information, and American public opinion" Princeton University Press 2002

33 Snyder, M., "Handbook of social psychology" Random House 883-948, 1985

34 Eid, M., "Detecting measurement invariance in organizational surveys" 16 (16): 20-, 2000

35 Craig, C. S., "Configural advantage in global markets" 8 (8): 6-26, 2000

36 Blackmore, J., "Academic pedagogies, quality logics and performative universities : Evaluating teaching and what students want" 34 (34): 857-872, 2009