본 연구는 매니저-판매사원간 향상초점 부합이 조절적합성 효과의 심리적 기제(예, 잘 맞는 느낌, 사회적 편안함), 판매사원의 창의적 행동 및 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향을 검증하였다. 또...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100855458
2015
Korean
KCI등재
학술저널
23-49(27쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드본 연구는 매니저-판매사원간 향상초점 부합이 조절적합성 효과의 심리적 기제(예, 잘 맞는 느낌, 사회적 편안함), 판매사원의 창의적 행동 및 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향을 검증하였다. 또...
본 연구는 매니저-판매사원간 향상초점 부합이 조절적합성 효과의 심리적 기제(예, 잘 맞는 느낌, 사회적 편안함), 판매사원의 창의적 행동 및 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향을 검증하였다. 또한 창의적 행동과 조직시민행동에 미치는 향상초점 부합 효과를 설명하는 심리적 기제로서 잘 맞는 느낌(feeling right) 및 사회적 편안함(social comfort)을 매개변수로 설정하여 매개 가설을 검증하였다. 본 연구를 위해 통신과 유통업에 종사하는 조직원들 가운데 판매사원 1인과 그(녀)의 매니저 1인을 하나의 쌍으로 하는 총 152쌍(304名)의 자료를 수집하였다. 이 가운데 응답내용이 불성실하다고 판단된 5쌍(10名)의 샘플을 제외한 147쌍(294名)이 최종분석 자료로 사용되었다. 다차항 회귀분석(polynomial regression analysis)과 반응표면방법론(response surface methodology)을 통한 자료 분석 결과, 매니저-판매사원간 향상초점 부합은 적합성 효과의 심리적 기제(잘 맞는 느낌, 사회적 편안함), 창의적 행동 및 조직시민행동에 각각 정(+)적인 관계를 보이는 것으로 나타났다. 구체적으로 향상초점에서 매니저와 판매사원이 일치할수록 적합성 효과의 심리적 기제(잘 맞는 느낌, 사회적 편안함), 창의적 행동, 조직시민행동은 각각 높아졌고, 특히 양자 간 향상초점이 낮은 수준(1,1)에서보다 높은 수준(7,7)에서 일치할 때 그 값들이 더 높아지는 것으로 나타났다. 다음으로 매개 가설을 검증한 결과, ‘잘 맞는 느낌’은 향상초점 부합과 조직시민행동 사이에서 매개역할을 하는 것으로 나타났고, ‘사회적 편안함’은 향상초점 부합과 창의적 행동 및 조직시민행동 사이에서 각각 매개효과가 나타났다. 끝으로 본 연구결과의 이론적, 실무적 시사점을 논의하였고, 연구의 한계점 및 향후 연구방향을 제시하였다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This study verified the impact of promotion focus fit between manager and salesperson on the psychological mechanism (e.g. feeling right, social comfort) of regulatory fit effects, creative behavior, and organizational citizenship behavior of a salesp...
This study verified the impact of promotion focus fit between manager and salesperson on the psychological mechanism (e.g. feeling right, social comfort) of regulatory fit effects, creative behavior, and organizational citizenship behavior of a salesperson. In addition, this study verified the mediated hypotheses by setting up parameters with ‘feeling right’ and ‘social comfort’ as the psychological mechanism explaining the promotion focus fit effect between a manager and salesperson influencing creative behavior and OCB. This study collected data through the use of a questionnaire on a total of 152 pairs (304 people), with one pair consisting of one salesperson and his/her manager among the organization members, who were engaged in the distribution and telecommunications industries. This study used data on 147 pairs (294 people) in total for its final analysis by excluding the samples for 5 pairs (10 people) whose responses were judged to be dishonest. As a result of data analysis through polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology, it was found that promotion focus fit between a manager and a salesperson showed a positive relation with the psychological mechanism of the fit effect (feeling right, social comfort), creative behavior and OCB, respectively. To put it concretely, the results showed that the more a manager and a salesperson coincided with each other in promotion focus, the higher the psychological mechanism of the fit effect (feeling right, social comfort), creative behavior, and OCB grew. In addition, as a result of conducting mediated-verification on the psychological mechanism variables of the fit effect, ‘feeling right’ was found to play an intermediary role between promotion focus fit and OCB, while ‘social comfort’ showed a mediated effect between promotion focus fit and creative behavior, OCB, respectively.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 김용운, "다항회귀를 이용한 자아이미지 일치성 측정: 간접측정 및 직접측정과의 비교" 한국마케팅학회 23 (23): 49-70, 2008
2 De Cremer, D., "When Does Self-Sacrificial Leadership Motivate Prosocial Behavior? It Depends on Followers’Prevention Focus" 94 (94): 887-899, 2009
3 Hedberg, P. H., "What Remains on Your Mind After You Are Done? : Flexible Regulation of Knowledge Accessibility" 47 (47): 882-890, 2011
4 Higgins, E. T., "Value from Regulatory Fit" 14 (14): 209-213, 2005
5 Lee, A. Y., "Value from Regulatory Construal Fit : The Persuasive Impact of Fit between Consumer Goals and Message Concreteness" 36 (36): 735-747, 2010
6 Higgins, E. T., "Value from Hedonic Experience and Engagement" 113 (113): 439-460, 2006
7 Aaker, J. L., "Understanding Regulatory Fit" 43 (43): 15-19, 2006
8 Higgins, E. T., "Transfer of Value from Fit" 84 (84): 1140-1153, 2003
9 Argyle, M., "The Social Psychology of Everyday Life" Routledge 1992
10 Stam, D. A., "The Role of Regulatory Fit in Visionary Leadership" 31 (31): 499-518, 2010
1 김용운, "다항회귀를 이용한 자아이미지 일치성 측정: 간접측정 및 직접측정과의 비교" 한국마케팅학회 23 (23): 49-70, 2008
2 De Cremer, D., "When Does Self-Sacrificial Leadership Motivate Prosocial Behavior? It Depends on Followers’Prevention Focus" 94 (94): 887-899, 2009
3 Hedberg, P. H., "What Remains on Your Mind After You Are Done? : Flexible Regulation of Knowledge Accessibility" 47 (47): 882-890, 2011
4 Higgins, E. T., "Value from Regulatory Fit" 14 (14): 209-213, 2005
5 Lee, A. Y., "Value from Regulatory Construal Fit : The Persuasive Impact of Fit between Consumer Goals and Message Concreteness" 36 (36): 735-747, 2010
6 Higgins, E. T., "Value from Hedonic Experience and Engagement" 113 (113): 439-460, 2006
7 Aaker, J. L., "Understanding Regulatory Fit" 43 (43): 15-19, 2006
8 Higgins, E. T., "Transfer of Value from Fit" 84 (84): 1140-1153, 2003
9 Argyle, M., "The Social Psychology of Everyday Life" Routledge 1992
10 Stam, D. A., "The Role of Regulatory Fit in Visionary Leadership" 31 (31): 499-518, 2010
11 Deci, E. L., "The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation" Oxford University Press 85-107, 2012
12 Shamir B., "The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership : a Self-Concept Based Theory" 4 (4): 577-594, 1993
13 Baron, R. M., "The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research : Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations" 51 (51): 1173-1182, 1986
14 Wu, C., "The Influence of Leader Regulatory Focus on Employee Creativity" 23 (23): 587-602, 2008
15 Friedman, R. S., "The Effects of Promotion and Prevention Cues on Creativity" 81 (81): 1001-1013, 2001
16 Chartrand, T. L., "The Chameleon Effect : The Perception-Behavior Link and Social Interaction" 76 (76): 893-910, 1999
17 Righetti, F., "The Benefits of Interpersonal Regulatory Fit for Individual Goal Pursuit" 101 (101): 720-736, 2011
18 Markus, H., "Self-Schemas and Processing Information about the Self" 35 (35): 63-78, 1977
19 Higgins, E. T., "Self-Discrepancy : A Theory Relating Self and Affect" 94 (94): 319-340, 1987
20 Ryan, R. M., "Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being" 55 (55): 68-78, 2000
21 Baer, M., "Rewarding Creativity : When Does It Really Matter?" 14 (14): 569-586, 2003
22 Kruglanski, A. W., "Regulatory Mode and Preferred Leadership Styles : How Fit Increases Job Satisfaction" 29 (29): 137-149, 2007
23 Neubert, M. J., "Regulatory Focus as a Mediator of the Influence of Initiating Structure and Servant Leadership on Employee Behavior" 93 (93): 1220-1233, 2008
24 Lanaj, K., "Regulatory Focus and Work-Related Outcomes : A Review and Meta-Analysis" 138 (138): 998-1034, 2012
25 Crowe, E., "Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations : Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making" 69 (69): 117-132, 1997
26 Brockner, J., "Regulatory Focus Theory : Implications for the Study of Emotions at Work" 86 (86): 35-66, 2001
27 Cesario, J., "Regulatory Fit from Nonverbal Behaviors : How Source Delivery Style Influences Message Effectiveness" Columbia University in the city of New York 2006
28 Freitas, A. L., "Regulatory Fit and Resisting Temptation During Goal Pursuit" 38 (38): 291-298, 2002
29 Cesario, J., "Regulatory Fit and Persuasion : Transfer from Feeling Right" 86 (86): 388-404, 2004
30 Cesario, J., "Regulatory Fit and Persuasion : Basic Principles and Remaining Questions" 2 (2): 444-463, 2008
31 Liberman, N., "Promotion and Prevention Choices Between Stability and Change" 80 (80): 5-18, 1999
32 Higgins, E. T., "Promotion and Prevention : Regulatory Focus as a Motivational Principle" 30 : 1-46, 1998
33 Edwards, J. R., "Problems with the Use of Profile Similarity Indices in the Study of Congruence in Organizational Research" 46 (46): 641-665, 1993
34 Kristof, A. L., "Person-Organization Wt : An Integrative Review of Its Conceptualizations, Measurement, and Implications" 49 (49): 1-49, 1996
35 Lawrence, J. W., "Perceived Stigmatization and Social Comfort : Validating the Constructs and Their Measurement Among Pediatric Burn Survivors" 55 (55): 360-371, 2010
36 Edwards, J. R., "On the Use of Polynomial Regression Equations as an Alternative to Difference Scores in Organizational Research" 36 (36): 1577-1613, 1993
37 Hair, J. F., "Multivariate data analysis" Pearson Education 2006
38 Kark, R., "Motivation to Lead, Motivation to Follow : The Role of the Self-Regulatory Focus in Leadership Processes" 32 (32): 500-528, 2007
39 Lockwood, P., "Motivation by Positive or Negative Role Models : Regulatory Focus Determines Who Will Best Inspire Us" 83 (83): 854-864, 2002
40 Camacho, C. J., "Moral Value Transfer from Regulatory Fit : What Feels Right Is Right and What Feels Wrong Is Wrong" 84 (84): 498-510, 2003
41 Higgins, E. T., "Making a Good Decision : Value from Fit" 55 (55): 1217-1230, 2000
42 Cesario, J., "Making Message Recipients Feel Right How Nonverbal Cues Can Increase Persuasion" 19 (19): 415-420, 2008
43 Hamstra, M. R. W., "Like or Dislike : Intrapersonal Regulatory Fit Affects the Intensity of Interpersonal Evaluation" 49 (49): 726-731, 2013
44 Kark, R., "Knowledge-Driven Corporation:A Discontinuous Model, LMX Leadership: The Series, Volume VI" Information Age Publishing 181-209, 2008
45 Niehoff, B. P., "Justice as a Mediator of the Relationship between Methods of Monitoring and Organizational Citizenship Behavior" 36 (36): 527-556, 1993
46 Colbert, A. E., "Interactive Effects of Personality and Perceptions of the Work Situation on Workplace Deviance" 89 (89): 599-609, 2004
47 Podsakoff, P. M., "Impact of Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Organizational Performance : A Review and Suggestions for Future Research" 10 (10): 133-151, 1997
48 Idson, L. C., "Imagining How You'd Feel : The Role of Motivational Experiences from Regulatory Fit" 30 (30): 926-937, 2004
49 Mossholder, K. W., "Human Resource Systems and Helping in Organizations : A Relational Perspective" 36 (36): 33-52, 2011
50 Spiegel, S., "How regulatory fit enhances motivational strength during goal pursuit" 34 (34): 39-54, 2004
51 Higgins, E. T., "How Self-Regulation Creates Distinct Values : The Case of Promotion and Prevention Decision Making" 12 (12): 177-191, 2002
52 Werth, L., "How Regulatory Focus Influences Consumer Behavior" 37 (37): 33-51, 2007
53 Avnet, T., "How Regulatory Fit Affects Value in Consumer Choices and Opinions" 43 (43): 1-10, 2006
54 Scholer, A. A., "Handbook of Self-Regulation" 143-161, 2010
55 Anna, S., "Growth or Security? Regulatory Focus Determines Work Priorities" 36 (36): 173-182, 2013
56 Levontin, L., "Goal-Orientation Theory and Regulatory-Focus Theory : The"Conflicting"Effects of Feedback-Sign, Working Paper" Hebrew University of Jerusalem 2004
57 Chernev, A., "Goal Orientation and Consumer Preference for the Status Quo" 31 (31): 557-565, 2004
58 Salanova, M., "Flow at Work : Evidence for an Upward Spiral of Personal and Organizational Resources" 7 (7): 1-22, 2006
59 Santelli, A. G., "Fit to Forgive : Exploring the Interaction between Regulatory Focus, Repentance, and Forgiveness" 96 (96): 381-394, 2009
60 Appelt, K. C., "Feeling Right or Being Right : When Strong Assessment Yields Strong Correction" 34 (34): 316-324, 2010
61 Borman, W. C., "Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance" 71-98, 1993
62 Butcher, K., "Evaluative and Relational Influences on Service Loyalty" 12 (12): 310-327, 2001
63 Box, G. E. P., "Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces" John Wiley and Sons 1987
64 Scott, S. G., "Determinants of Innovative Behavior : A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace" 37 (37): 580-607, 1994
65 Amabile, T. M., "Creativity in Context. Boulder" Westview Press 1996
66 Kristof-Brown, A. L., "Consequences of Individuals’ Fit at Work : A Meta-Analysis of Person-Job, Person-Organization, Person-Group, and Person-Supervisor Fit" 58 (58): 281-342, 2005
67 Bettencourt, L. A., "Change-Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behaviors : The Direct and Moderating Influence of Goal Orientation" 80 (80): 165-180, 2004
68 Lee, A. Y., "Bringing the Frame into Focus : The Influence of Regulatory Fit on Processing Fluency and Persuasion" 86 (86): 205-218, 2004
69 Labroo, A. A., "Between Two Brands : A Goal Fluency Account of Brand Evaluation" 43 (43): 374-385, 2006
70 Hong, J., "Be Fit and Be Strong : Mastering Self-Regulation with Regulatory Fit" 34 (34): 682-695, 2008
71 Förster, J., "Approach and Avoidance Strength During Goal Attainment : Regulatory Focus and the 'Goal Looms Larger' Effect" 75 (75): 1015-1031, 1998
72 Edwards, J. R., "An Examination of Competing Versions of the Person-Environment Fit Approach to Stress" 39 (39): 292-339, 1996
73 Kizilos, M. A., "A Participatively Designed Shift System Reduces Turnover in a Glass Factory" 14 (14): 67-76, 1995
74 Aaker, J. L., "'I' Seek Pleasures and 'We' Avoid Pains : The Role of Self-Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion" 28 (28): 33-49, 2001
75 Higgins, E. T., ""Beyond Pleasure and Pain : How Motivation Works" Oxford University Press 2012
동반성장노력에 대한 지각차이가 관계가치 및 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2020-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2019-05-10 | 학회명변경 | 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korean Marketing Association | ![]() |
| 2019-04-03 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : Korean Marketing Review -> Korean Journal of Marketing | ![]() |
| 2017-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2013-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2008-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2002-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 1999-07-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1.93 | 1.93 | 1.95 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 2.03 | 1.94 | 4.016 | 0.3 |