RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      미ㆍ중 경쟁 시대 한국의 ‘중간국’ 정체성과 외교원칙 모색 = The ROK’s in-between “Middle State’ Identity and Diplomatic Principles in the Era of the US-China Competition

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108627223

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Korea is a ‘middle state’ situated and squeezed between the US-China strategic competition. Korea as a middle state could be a pivot state receiving love-calls from both sides and a bridging state connecting both sides. Or Korea could be a shatter...

      Korea is a ‘middle state’ situated and squeezed between the US-China strategic competition. Korea as a middle state could be a pivot state receiving love-calls from both sides and a bridging state connecting both sides. Or Korea could be a shatter zone state, squeezed and destabilized between great powers, as it had suffered historically. Korea’s diplomatic decisions today is such a critical issue for all of us as its rise or failure in the future totally lies on such decisions. The US-China strategic competition is one of the biggest foreign policy threats to Korea just like many other like-situated middle states. To effectively deal with the US-China competition, Korean diplomacy should define its national vision and national interests based on its geopolitical identity. Only then unified integration of national power and strategic diplomacy will be possible.
      This paper proposes 4 possible Korean identities as follows: a divided state with vulnerable national security due to the division, a geopolitical middle state surrounded and squeezed among both great power competition, and land and sea powers, a middle power state supporting rules-based international order, a trading state with a high foreign economic dependency. This report proposes ‘a global peace bridge state’ as Korea’s national vision in the US-China competition era. Also five diplomatic principles that Korea should follow in the US-China competition era were also proposed: principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity, peace coexistence, regionalism and international cooperation, multilateralism and rules- based international order, and national unity. Such principles replace such traditional diplomatic principles as the absolute coincidence of Korea-US alliance, waite and see, reactive adaptation that the Korean diplomacy followed throughout the US-led Cold War and post-Cold War era. These principles proposed here for era of the US-China competition should become Korea’s general diplomacy principles that Korea should adopt in order to perform a strategic and autonomous diplomacy.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼