RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      Advancing Creativity and Citizen Engagement by Collaborative Leadership

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103769650

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper argues that the structure and process of collaboration enhances prospects for creativity and citizen engagement. These rewards of collaboration also accompany inefficiency problems with the risks of increasing transaction costs, opportunity costs, and social capital costs. In competing with traditional (ex. hierarchical) modes of problem solving, nevertheless, collaboration as a problem solving strategy can have merits when the right leadership puts its rewards surpassing its risks. When leaders seek to facilitate ‘collaborative processes,’ they need to pay attentions to five dimensions of governance, administration, mutuality, autonomy, and norms of trust and reciprocity.
      From Chrislip and Larson’s work, I adopt ‘process leadership’ as a suitable leadership type for collaboration due to the fact that problem solving situations are characterized by cross-boundary collaboration, unclear prospects for getting results, and supremacy of nurturing over expertise. Rather than tactical, positional, or heroic leadership, this process leadership shares a great deal in common with transformational, servant or facilitative leadership. Collaborative leadership skills such as managing paradox, leading in solving peer problems, and keeping partners in networks are good examples.
      번역하기

      This paper argues that the structure and process of collaboration enhances prospects for creativity and citizen engagement. These rewards of collaboration also accompany inefficiency problems with the risks of increasing transaction costs, opportunity...

      This paper argues that the structure and process of collaboration enhances prospects for creativity and citizen engagement. These rewards of collaboration also accompany inefficiency problems with the risks of increasing transaction costs, opportunity costs, and social capital costs. In competing with traditional (ex. hierarchical) modes of problem solving, nevertheless, collaboration as a problem solving strategy can have merits when the right leadership puts its rewards surpassing its risks. When leaders seek to facilitate ‘collaborative processes,’ they need to pay attentions to five dimensions of governance, administration, mutuality, autonomy, and norms of trust and reciprocity.
      From Chrislip and Larson’s work, I adopt ‘process leadership’ as a suitable leadership type for collaboration due to the fact that problem solving situations are characterized by cross-boundary collaboration, unclear prospects for getting results, and supremacy of nurturing over expertise. Rather than tactical, positional, or heroic leadership, this process leadership shares a great deal in common with transformational, servant or facilitative leadership. Collaborative leadership skills such as managing paradox, leading in solving peer problems, and keeping partners in networks are good examples.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Park, H. J., "Types of network governance and network performance: Community development project case. in: Collaborative Governance in the United States and Korea" Seoul National University Press 199-222, 2009

      2 Connelly, D.R., "The paradoxical nature of collaboration. in: Big Ideas in Collaborative Public Management" M.E. Sharpe 17-35, 2008

      3 Tschirhart , M., "The paradox of branding and collaboration" 29 (29): 67-84, 2005

      4 Cummings, L. L., "The organizational trust inventory. in: Trust in Organizations" Sage Publications 302-330, 1996

      5 Salamon, L., "The new governance and the tools of public action: An introduction. in: The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance" Oxford University Press 1-47, 2002

      6 Ring, P.S., "Strategic management in public and private organizations: Implications of distinctive contexts and constraints" 10 : 276-286, 1985

      7 Ospina, S., "Paradox and collaboration in coalition work" 2005

      8 Thomson, A.M., "Linking collaboration processes and outcomes. in: Collaborative Public Management" M.E. Sharpe 97-120, 2008

      9 Crosby, B.C., "Leadership for the common good: Tackling public problems in a shared-power world, 2nd edition" Jossey-Bass 2005

      10 Sirianni, Carmen, "Investing in democracy: Engaging citizens in Collaborative Governance" The Brookings Institution 2009

      1 Park, H. J., "Types of network governance and network performance: Community development project case. in: Collaborative Governance in the United States and Korea" Seoul National University Press 199-222, 2009

      2 Connelly, D.R., "The paradoxical nature of collaboration. in: Big Ideas in Collaborative Public Management" M.E. Sharpe 17-35, 2008

      3 Tschirhart , M., "The paradox of branding and collaboration" 29 (29): 67-84, 2005

      4 Cummings, L. L., "The organizational trust inventory. in: Trust in Organizations" Sage Publications 302-330, 1996

      5 Salamon, L., "The new governance and the tools of public action: An introduction. in: The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance" Oxford University Press 1-47, 2002

      6 Ring, P.S., "Strategic management in public and private organizations: Implications of distinctive contexts and constraints" 10 : 276-286, 1985

      7 Ospina, S., "Paradox and collaboration in coalition work" 2005

      8 Thomson, A.M., "Linking collaboration processes and outcomes. in: Collaborative Public Management" M.E. Sharpe 97-120, 2008

      9 Crosby, B.C., "Leadership for the common good: Tackling public problems in a shared-power world, 2nd edition" Jossey-Bass 2005

      10 Sirianni, Carmen, "Investing in democracy: Engaging citizens in Collaborative Governance" The Brookings Institution 2009

      11 Bae, K. H., "How does collaborative governance work for waste facility siting: Focusing on the case of Gunpo City. in: Collaborative Governance in the United States and Korea" Seoul National University Press 75-95, 2009

      12 Fernandez, S., "Exploring the link between integrated leadership and public sector performance" 21 (21): 308-323, 2010

      13 Lewis, M. W., "Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide" 25 : 760-776, 2000

      14 Moody, M., "Everyone will get better together: How those responsible for California’s bay-delta water system understand collaboration. in: Collaborative Governance in the United States and Korea" Seoul National University Press 21-55, 2009

      15 Thomson, A.M., "Conceptualizing and measuring collaboration" 19 (19): 23-56, 2009

      16 Agranoff, R., "Collaborative public management: New strategies for local government" Georgetown University Press 2003

      17 Cooper, T.L., "Collaborative public governance: Implications for civic engagement. in: Collaborative Governance in the United States and Korea" Seoul National University Press 223-249, 2009

      18 Chrislip, D.D., "Collaborative leadership: How citizens and civic leaders can make a difference" Jossey-Bass 1994

      19 Chang, H.J., "Collaborative governance in welfare service delivery:Focusing on local welfare system in Korea. in: Collaborative Governance in the United States and Korea" Seoul National University Press 173-197, 2009

      20 Jung, Y.D., "Collaborative Governance in the United States and Korea" Seoul National University Press 2009

      21 Thomson, A.M., "Collaboration: Meaning and Measurement" Indiana University 2001

      22 Thomson, A. M., "Collaboration processes: Inside the black box" 66 : 19-32, 2006

      23 Huxham , C., "Collaboration and collaborative advantage. in: Creating Collaborative Advantage" Sage Publications 1-18, 1996

      24 Ostrom, E., "A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action" 92 (92): 1-22, 1998

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-10-23 학회명변경 한글명 : 성균관대학교 국정관리대학원 -> 성균관대학교 국정전문대학원 KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2010-07-02 학회명변경 영문명 : graduate of governance -> graduate school of governance KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.44 0.44 0.4
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.47 0.55 0.645 0.04
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼