인터넷상의 표현의 자유의 보호영역과 사상의 자유시장과 한계 -전기통신사업법 47조 1항의 위헌성을 중심으로- = Freedom of expression in cyberspace, Free Market of expression. and the Limit of Freedom of expression in cyberspace -focusing on punishment clause in cyberspace because of spreading false fact openly to damage public interest-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In Korea, going through global economic crisis and congregation of candlelight, punishing of Minerva case and person who spreaded false fact during congregation of candlelight because of spreading false fact openly to damage public interest is social interest. Specially in korea, We have punishment clause which punishes person who spread false fact during congregation of candlelight because of spreading false fact openly to damage public interest. I came to write this thesis thinking our present address of democracy and how to protect Freedom of expression up to some point. Freedom of expression in cyberspace, must be protected only for right of Information. To improve right of Information, we must protect Freedom of expression in cyberspace in Free Market of expression. But to stop spreading of false Information, government must, first, privide right Information and establish foundation of Information. Then exceptionally, government must punish person spreading false fact openly to damage public interest, in condition that there are no effective alternatives only in political and economic crisis. That is, Freedom of expression in cyberspace can be regulated under clear and existing danger. But punishing person spreading false fact to damage public interest, specially in political and economic crisis, must be cautious Because the best effective way to solve this problem is conversation and debate in Free Market of expression. In the long run, our punishing clause must disappear into back street in our history. Freedom of expression in cyberspace must be improved but abuse of Freedom of expression, must be regulated by self control, first ,and second, government intervention. Through all these efforts, we can develop right democracy.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이부하, "표현의 자유와 미국헌법" 한국학술진흥정보 2007

2 앨빈토플러, "제3물결" 한국경제신문사 1989

3 조동기, "정보화시대의 미디어와 문화, 제 2장 정보화사회와 프라이버시-정보적 구성,데이터베이스, 프라이버시" 한국사회학회 1998

4 장호순, "정보화사회에서의 자유와 평등" , (8) : 1997

5 강정인, "정보사회와 민주주의 : 전망과 검토, in: 정보사회, 그 문화와 윤리" 소화 1996

6 전석호, "정보사회론: 커뮤니케이션 혁명과 뉴미디어" 나남 1993

7 김문조, "정보격차(Digital Divide)의 이론적·정책적 재고" 한국사회학회 36 (36): 5-28, 2002

8 한상희, "전자민주주의의 헌법적 수용과 과제-표현의 자유와 관련하여-, in: 헌법 50년의 평가와 정보화시대의 헌법적 과제, 민주헌정과 국가정보화- 전자정부와 전자민주주의의 실천을 위한 공법적 과제"

9 박동진, "전자 민주주의가 오고 있다" 책세상 7-, 2000

10 정동욱, "전자 민주주의 가능한가" 1997

11 정영화, "인터넷상의 표현의 자유의 규제" (6) :

12 이영음, "인터넷 전자신문 시문을 대체할 것인가?" 18 :

13 한상희, "사이버민주주의-그 의미와 헌법적 전망" (창간) : 1998

14 최대권, "사례중심헌법학" 박영사 1997

15 金文顯, "비디오물의 事前審議의 違憲性 與否" 1994

16 박용상, "명예훼손법" 현암사 2008

17 Barry N. Hague, "igital Democracy :Discourse and Decision Making in the Information Age" Routledge 1999

18 Ronald D. Rotunda, "The Warren Court and Freedom of the Press, in the Warren Court" Oxford University Press 1996

19 NORBERTO BOBBIO, "The Future of Democracy -A Defence of the rules of the Game"

20 CASS R., "Republic.com" Princeton University Press 2001

21 Rodney A. Smolla, "On Freedom of speech ; A Treatise on The Amendment, Student Edition" Mattthew Bender 1994

22 Steiner, "K ulturauftrag im staatlichen Gemeinwesen" 42 : 1984

23 Susan Herring, "Gender and Democracy in computer-Mediated Communication" 3 : 1993

24 CASS R. SUNSTEIN, "DES1GN1NG DEMOCRAC" OXPORD university press 2001

25 Daniel E. Troy, "Advertising: Not Low Value Speech" 16 : 85-, 1999