정신지체 교육과정의 교육목표와 교육내용 쟁점 분석 = A Study on Issues Related to the Goals and Contents of Education for the Mentally Retarded

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The objective of the present study was to identify major issues related to the setting of educational goals and the selection of education contents discussed in the course of developing curriculums for the mentally retarded, and to suggest solutions for the issues. With regard to the setting of educational goals, we examined the structure of educational goals, the contents and emphases of the goals, the method of describing educational goals, etc. In addition, with regard to the selection and organization of contents, we analyzed problems in the development.centered and function.centered approaches and discussed solutions for the problems from the aspect of human growth and development, which is the fundamental goal of education, and the acquisition of problem.solving ability, which is a practical goal of education. Conclusions drawn from research on educational goals are as follows. First, it is more desirable to set non.curricular goals for realizing an educated human being than goals representing subjects or life areas. Second, it is more desirable to suggest educational goals by school level than common educational goals applied to all school levels. Third, it is more desirable to use causative verbs led by teachers for describing general educational goals by school level, and to use accomplishment.type verbs led by students for describing particular educational goals by curriculum. Conclusions drawn from research on education contents are as follows. First, rather than completely excluding either developmental tasks or life skills, approach should be made as a matter of what contents are more necessary to whom and when. Second, the matter is not which of curricular knowledge and life skills is more important, but the contents of education for the mentally retarded are meaningful when they are learned by the students purposively and meaningfully and applied to the solving of life problems. Third, what curriculums should be focused on are not contents to be conveyed through education but learners’ activities of learning the contents conveyed. Fourth, learners’ learning activities should be active activities of structuring and restructuring experiences.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Brown, L., 13 (13): 81-90, 1979

2 국립특수교육원, "한국특수학교 교육과정 변천사. 연구 94-R-1"

3 교육부, "특수학교 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제19998-1호"

4 교육부, "특수학교 교육과정 해설(1) 총론. 교육부 고시 제1998-1호에 따른"

5 국립특수교육원, "특수학교 교육과정 개정 시안 수정·보완 연구. 2007년도 교육과정개정연구 위탁과제 답신보고서"

6 윤광보, "특수교육과정의 재개념화. 김정권외. 탈산업사회와 특수교육" 도서출판 특수교육 245-266, 2003

7 교육부, "특수교육 연차보고서. 2007년 정기국회 보고자료"

8 국립특수교육원, "특수교육 교육과정 국제동향분석" 서울멀티넷 2004

9 여광응, "지적장애와 인지개발 가능성. 지적장애아 교육의 심리학적 탐색" 학지사 2008

10 곽병선, "제7차 교육과정 개정안의 교육적 인간상 및 교육 목표 연구" 한국교육개발원 1997

11 윤광보, "정신지체아의 질적 교육을 위한 교육과정 운영 방략. 대구대학교 학위논문"

12 문교부, "정신박야학교 중학부(훈련가능)생활 교사용 지도서" 국정교과서주식회사 1987

13 이경섭, "교육과정론" 경북대학교 출판부 1976

14 최호성, "교육과정 평가의 모형 정립과 목표의 평가 준거 설정 및 타당화" 경북대학교 1993

15 이경섭, "교육과정 쟁점 연구" 교육과학사 1999

16 최성욱, "교육과정 개념화의 대안적 접근" 33 (33): 193-216, 1995

17 문교부, "교사용지도서 정신박약아 교육" 문교부 1975

18 Feuerstein,R., "The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instructions, and techniques" University Park Press 1979

19 Kuhn,T., "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd Ed)" The University of Chicago Press 1970

20 Kohlberg,L., "The Philosophy of Moral Development" Haper and Row 1981

21 Piaget, J., "The Construction of Reality in the Child" Basic Book 1954

22 Goldstein,H., "Social learning curriculum" Charles E.Merrill 1975

23 Schloss, J., "Instructional Methods for Students with Learning and Behavior Problems" Allyn and Bacon 1986

24 Sands. D. J., "Inclusive Education for the 21st Century" Wadsworth 2000

25 Papalia, D. E., "Human Development" 교육과학사 1989

26 Kirk, S. A., "Educating the mentally retarded child" Houghton Mifflin 1951

27 Nicholls, A., "Developing a Curriculum: A Practical Guide. 2nd ed" George Allen & Unwin 1978

28 Dewey,J., "Democracy and education" The Macmillan Company 1916

29 Wheeler,D.K., "Curriculum Process" University of London Press 1974

30 Pugach, M. C., "Curriculum Matters : Raising expectation for students with disabilities" 22 (22): 194-213, 2001

31 Taba,H., "Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice" Harcourt,Brace & World 1962

32 Print,M., "Curriculum Development and Design" Allen & Unwin 1987

33 Klein, N. K., "Curriculum Analysis and Design for Retarded Learners" A Bell and Howell Company 1979

34 Merrill,M.D., "Constructivism and Instructional Design" 31 (31): 45-53, 1991

35 Tyler,R., "Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction" University of Chicago Press 1949

36 Goldstein, H., "A curriculum guide for teacher of the educable mentally handicapped" Interstate Printers and Publishers 1958

37 Sands, D., "A Statewide Exploration of the Nature and Use of Curriculum in Special Education" 62 (62): 68-83, 1995

38 Stephens,B., "A Piagetian Approach to Curriculum Development for the Severely, Profoundly and Multiply Handicapped ; Educational Programming for Severely and Profoundly Handicapped" The Division on Mental Retardation The Council for Exceptional Children 237-249, 1977

39 Orkwis, R., "A Curriculum every student can use :?Design principles for?student Access. ERIC/OSEP Topical Brief. Fall 1998"