RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    소비자보호를 위한 바람직한집단소송 시스템 = Adequate collective group litigation system for the protection of the collective interests of consumers

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104730001

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Last year korean government introduced a bill which contains Draft for Consumer Protection Act(hereinafter called as the draft) to the assembly. The draft aims fundamentally at the protection of the collective interests of consumers, and then classical german group litigation(hereinafter called as Verbandsklage) was inserted in draft. Classical Verbandsklage means that qualified entities could bring an action for the consumers on the basis of their own rights. At first entities' claim is narrowly restricted to the cessation or prohibition of any infringement, but now qualified entities generally could get an order against the losing defendant for payments into the public purse or to any beneficiary (Gewinnabachpfung). Furthermore in Germany qualified entities could directly claim damages of consumers through conveyance of some consumers' monetary claim(Verbandsmusterverfahren). And in some area such as stock market, consumers could ask for Kapitalanleger-Musterverfahren before the court, and the court could select a model process of the cases which contain the same cause of action. Before we accept the new Verbandsklage system in the draft, we should sincerely consider these new models which are lately developed in Germany and EU boundaries as much as class action system of the America. And also we should classify massive damages according to the their own characters, we make a appropriate measure separately to handle such damages.
    번역하기

    Last year korean government introduced a bill which contains Draft for Consumer Protection Act(hereinafter called as the draft) to the assembly. The draft aims fundamentally at the protection of the collective interests of consumers, and then classica...

    Last year korean government introduced a bill which contains Draft for Consumer Protection Act(hereinafter called as the draft) to the assembly. The draft aims fundamentally at the protection of the collective interests of consumers, and then classical german group litigation(hereinafter called as Verbandsklage) was inserted in draft. Classical Verbandsklage means that qualified entities could bring an action for the consumers on the basis of their own rights. At first entities' claim is narrowly restricted to the cessation or prohibition of any infringement, but now qualified entities generally could get an order against the losing defendant for payments into the public purse or to any beneficiary (Gewinnabachpfung). Furthermore in Germany qualified entities could directly claim damages of consumers through conveyance of some consumers' monetary claim(Verbandsmusterverfahren). And in some area such as stock market, consumers could ask for Kapitalanleger-Musterverfahren before the court, and the court could select a model process of the cases which contain the same cause of action. Before we accept the new Verbandsklage system in the draft, we should sincerely consider these new models which are lately developed in Germany and EU boundaries as much as class action system of the America. And also we should classify massive damages according to the their own characters, we make a appropriate measure separately to handle such damages.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 한충수, "증권관련집단소송에서의 손해산정과 분배절차" (72) : 2003.4

    2 "증권관련집단소송법의 허가요건과 허가절차상의 몇 가지 문제점" (331) : 2004.3

    3 윤 경, "소송신탁의 판단기준 및 임의적 소송담당의 허용한계" (389) :

    4 "獨逸 私法上 團體訴訟" 74 : 1996.12

    5 "Zivilprozessrecht" 2003

    6 "UWG-Reform und Gewinnabschpfungsanspruch oder Die Wiederkehr der Drachen" 2004

    7 "Rethinking Damages in Securities Class Actions" 1996

    8 "Regierungsentwurf einer UWG Novelle-ausgewlte Probleme" 2003

    9 "Musterverbandsklagen nach knftigem deutschen Recht" 2002

    10 Hans-W. Micklitz, "Musterklageverfahren-Einziehung einer Forderung im Interesse des Verbraucherschutzes" 2004

    1 한충수, "증권관련집단소송에서의 손해산정과 분배절차" (72) : 2003.4

    2 "증권관련집단소송법의 허가요건과 허가절차상의 몇 가지 문제점" (331) : 2004.3

    3 윤 경, "소송신탁의 판단기준 및 임의적 소송담당의 허용한계" (389) :

    4 "獨逸 私法上 團體訴訟" 74 : 1996.12

    5 "Zivilprozessrecht" 2003

    6 "UWG-Reform und Gewinnabschpfungsanspruch oder Die Wiederkehr der Drachen" 2004

    7 "Rethinking Damages in Securities Class Actions" 1996

    8 "Regierungsentwurf einer UWG Novelle-ausgewlte Probleme" 2003

    9 "Musterverbandsklagen nach knftigem deutschen Recht" 2002

    10 Hans-W. Micklitz, "Musterklageverfahren-Einziehung einer Forderung im Interesse des Verbraucherschutzes" 2004

    11 "Die Gruppenklage:Wege zur prozessualen Bewltigung von Massenschden" 1996

    12 Norbert Meier, "Das neue Kapitalanleger-Musterverfahrensgesetz" 2005

    13 "Das Verbandsklagerecht in der Informations-und Dienstleistungsgesellschaft" 2005

    14 "Das Kapitalanleger-Musterverfahrensgesetz" 2005

    15 Astrid Stadler, "Bndelung von Interessen im Zivilprozess, berlegungen zur Einfhrung von Verbands- und Gruppenklagen im deutschen Recht, Vortrag Juristische Studiengesellschaft Karlsruhe" 2004

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.31 0.31 0.49
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.54 0.5 0.606 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼