RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      The Legitimacy of Optional Appellate Arbitration

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Procedural flexibility and party autonomy are fundamental to arbitral proceedings. The parties should be able to avail themselves to a substantial review of their arbitral award by an appellate arbitration, upon parties’ agreement. With appellate arbitration, most of the advantageous features of arbitral process, such as finality and enforceability of arbitral awards, ability to select decision makers of the parties’ disputes, flexibility and confidentiality in proceedings, would still hold true even despite the potential for increased time and costs. The more significant potential for an enhanced legitimacy and correctness of arbitral awards would ultimately lead to greater satisfaction of the users of arbitration and greater confidence in the arbitral process. In this article, the author argues in support of appellate arbitrations on an opt-in basis(by party agreement), discusses the currently available optional appellate arbitral procedures of some of the major arbitral institutions in the United States, and finally, makes suggestions as to optimal appellate arbitral procedures, in the hopes of making arbitration more of a truly alternative dispute resolution mechanism.
      번역하기

      Procedural flexibility and party autonomy are fundamental to arbitral proceedings. The parties should be able to avail themselves to a substantial review of their arbitral award by an appellate arbitration, upon parties’ agreement. With appellate ar...

      Procedural flexibility and party autonomy are fundamental to arbitral proceedings. The parties should be able to avail themselves to a substantial review of their arbitral award by an appellate arbitration, upon parties’ agreement. With appellate arbitration, most of the advantageous features of arbitral process, such as finality and enforceability of arbitral awards, ability to select decision makers of the parties’ disputes, flexibility and confidentiality in proceedings, would still hold true even despite the potential for increased time and costs. The more significant potential for an enhanced legitimacy and correctness of arbitral awards would ultimately lead to greater satisfaction of the users of arbitration and greater confidence in the arbitral process. In this article, the author argues in support of appellate arbitrations on an opt-in basis(by party agreement), discusses the currently available optional appellate arbitral procedures of some of the major arbitral institutions in the United States, and finally, makes suggestions as to optimal appellate arbitral procedures, in the hopes of making arbitration more of a truly alternative dispute resolution mechanism.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Thomas J. Stipanowich, "in Evolution: Current Practices and Perspectives of Experienced Commercial Arbitrators" 25 : 395-480, 2014

      2 전정원, "The Integrity of Finality of International Arbitral Awards: International Commercial and ICSID Arbitration Awards" 한국중재학회 28 (28): 137-163, 2018

      3 "The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards"

      4 전정원, "Recent Developments of Emergency Arbitration in International Arbitration and Considerations for Implementation of Emergency Arbitration in Korea" 안암법학회 (46) : 351-389, 2015

      5 Michael A. Lampert, "Making Arbitration More Appealing" 35 (35): 36-, 2017

      6 "JAMS Optional Arbitration Appeal Procedure"

      7 Gary B. Born, "International Arbitration: Law and Practice" Wolters Kluwer 2012

      8 Axay Satagopan, "Conceptualizing a Framework of Institutionalized Appellate Arbitration in International Commercial Arbitration" 18 : 325-391, 2018

      9 "CPR Appellate Arbitration Procedure"

      10 E. Norman Veasey, "An Overview of the General Counsel’s Decision Making on Dispute-Resolution Strategies in Complex Business Transactions" 70 : 407-436, 2015

      1 Thomas J. Stipanowich, "in Evolution: Current Practices and Perspectives of Experienced Commercial Arbitrators" 25 : 395-480, 2014

      2 전정원, "The Integrity of Finality of International Arbitral Awards: International Commercial and ICSID Arbitration Awards" 한국중재학회 28 (28): 137-163, 2018

      3 "The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards"

      4 전정원, "Recent Developments of Emergency Arbitration in International Arbitration and Considerations for Implementation of Emergency Arbitration in Korea" 안암법학회 (46) : 351-389, 2015

      5 Michael A. Lampert, "Making Arbitration More Appealing" 35 (35): 36-, 2017

      6 "JAMS Optional Arbitration Appeal Procedure"

      7 Gary B. Born, "International Arbitration: Law and Practice" Wolters Kluwer 2012

      8 Axay Satagopan, "Conceptualizing a Framework of Institutionalized Appellate Arbitration in International Commercial Arbitration" 18 : 325-391, 2018

      9 "CPR Appellate Arbitration Procedure"

      10 E. Norman Veasey, "An Overview of the General Counsel’s Decision Making on Dispute-Resolution Strategies in Complex Business Transactions" 70 : 407-436, 2015

      11 "American Arbitration Association (AAA) Optional Appellate Arbitration Rules"

      12 Robert O. Sheridan, "All Almost Quiet on the Expanded Review Front:Supreme Court Rejects Expansion of Judicial Review of Arbitration Awards" 13 : 93-120, 2008

      13 "2018 International Arbitration Survey: The Evolution of International Arbitration conducted by Queen Mary University of London"

      14 "2015 International Arbitration Survey: Improvements and Innovations in International Arbitration"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-08-23 학회명변경 영문명 : Chungnam National University Law Resarch Institute -> Chungnam National University Law Research Institute KCI등재
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2013-12-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Law KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.65 0.65 0.73
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.74 0.79 0.817 0.22
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼