주요국의 질 평가 접근법 비교분석에 기초한 대학의 질적 수준 평가 지표 개발 = Developing Indicators for Assessing the Quality of Developing Indicators for Assessing the Quality of approaches in Foreign Countries

국문 초록 (Abstract)

대학의 기능 수행에 대한 사회적인 관심이 증대되어 대학의 질 제고와 대학의 질 평가가 중요한 과제로 인식되고 있다. 이에 이 연구는 대학의 질 개념을 정립하고, 정립된 질 개념에 터하여 대학의 질적 수준을 종합적으로 진단할 수 있는 지표를 개발하는 데 연구의 주된 목적을 두었다. 종합적인 문헌분석과 연구진 검토를 통해 목표/목적 달성, 고객요구충족, 가치부가 측면을 강조한 투입-과정-산출 체제로서의 대학의 질 개념을 설정하였다. 설정된 대학의 질 개념을 바탕으로 하여 미국, 영국, 호주, 일본 등 주요국에서 사용되고 있는 대학기관인증평가, 대학순위평가, 학생설문조사, 학습성과평가 등 4가지 유형의 질적 수준 분석 도구에 포함된 지표들(6개국 13개 평가도구)을 분석한 뒤 대학의 질적 수준 평가 지표 초안을 마련하였고, 전문가 검증과 연구진 검토를 통해 최종 지표들을 개발하였다. 이러한 지표들은 투입-과정-산출 차원에서 기관목표, 인적자원, 물적자원, 교육과정, 학습활동, 교육산출, 연구산출의 영역으로 구성되었다. 개발된 지표가 대학의 질 제고를 유도하는 순기능 역할을 발휘하는 데 필요한 사항들이 제안되었다

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study aimed to establish a conceptual scheme of the quality of university and to develop a set of structured indicators for assessing the quality of university based on the result of comparative analysis of major approaches in foreign countries.
Reviewing extensive literatures regarding the quality of higher education, a conceptual scheme of the quality of university, in which three representative approaches such as a goal-accomplishment approach, a customer-satisfaction approach, and a value-added approach were emphasized, was proposed and the quality of university was defined as a function of harmonization of input-process-output elements of universities.
To develop indicators for assessing the quality of university, four types of approaches including university accreditation system, commercially- producted university ranking system, college student survey, and direct assessment of students' learning outcomes were reviewed. Finally thirteen sets of evaluation indicators out of six countries were comparatively analyzed. The analyses focused on the format, the content, and the primary concept of the quality in each instrument and a draft of the assessment indicators were structured. The draft of the assessment indicators were verified through a panel of professionals.
The final indicators assessing the quality of university consist of three dimensions and seven areas. The input dimension comprised institutional goals, human resources, and physical resources. In the process dimension, curriculum and learning process areas were included. And, finally, the output dimension consists of educational outputs and research outputs. Based on the outcomes of the study, the recommendations were suggested for improving and utilizing the assessment indicators of the quality of university.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 대학의 질 개념과 주요국의 질 평가 접근법 비교
• Ⅲ. 대학의 질적 수준 평가 지표 개발
• Ⅳ. 요약 및 제언
• 초록
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 신현석, "한국의 고등교육 개혁정책" 학지사 2005

2 허귀진, "한국․미국․일본 3국의 기관평가방법에 관한 연구" 한국대학교육협의회 2005

3 나민주, "언론기관 대학평가의 발전과제" 12 (12): 167-189, 2001

4 김병주, "언론기관 대학평가 모형 탐색" 18 (18): 45-77, 2000

5 한국대학교육협의회, "대학종합평가 편람" 한국대학교육협의회 2006

6 서민원, "대학교육의 효과성 변인의 측정과 분석" 서울대학교 1996

7 허귀진, "국내외 대학평가의 동향" 한국대학교육협의회 2002

8 이만희, "고등교육기관 체제의 수행지표 개발연구" 한국교육개발원 2003

9 Kuh,G, "What we're learning about student engagement from NSSE" 35 (35): 24-32, 2003

10 Green,D, "What is Quality in Higher Education?" SRHE and Open University Press 1994

11 NIAD-UE, "University evaluation standards" NIAD-UE 2005

12 Klein,S.P., "The validity of the U. S. News and World Report ranking of ABA law schools"

13 Morgan,A.W, "The quest for excellence: Underlying policy issues. in Achieving Accountability in Higher Education" Agathon Press 349-388, 1985

14 Altbach,P, "The dilemmas of rankings" 42 : 2-3, 2006

15 Erwin,T.D, "Standardized testing and accountability: Finding the way and the will. in Achieving Accountability in Higher Education" Jossey-Bass 125-147, 2005

16 Bogue,E.G, "Quality and accountability in higher education" Praeger 2003

17 Conrad,C.F., "Program quality in higher education: A review and critique of literature and research in Higher education: Handbook of theory and research(Vol. 1)" Agathon Press 283-348, 1985

18 최정윤, "OECD 고등교육 학습성과 평가사업 참여를 위한 기초 연구(Ⅰ)" 한국교육개발원 2007

19 Grubb,W.N., "OECD Thematic Review of Tertiary Education: Country Note for Korea" OECD 2006

20 Brooks,R.L, "Measuring university quality" 29 (29): 1-21, 2005

21 Barnett,R, "Improving higher education: Total quality care" SRHE & Open University Press 1992

22 The Higher Learning Commission, "Handbook of accreditation (3rd ed.)" The Higher Learning Commission 2003

23 Graham,A, "Broken ranks: US News' college rankings measure everything but what matters. And most universities don't seem to minds" 33 (33): 9-14, 2001

24 Astin,A.W, "Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education" MacMillan 1991

25 Kuh,G, "Assessing what really matters to student learning" 33 (33): 10-17, 2001

26 Astin,A.W, "Achieving educational excellence" Jossey-Bass 1985

27 Burke,J.C., "Achieving accountability in higher education:Balancing public,academic and market demand" Jossey-Bass 2005

28 Dill,D.D., "Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems" 49 (49): 495-533, 2005

29 Commission on the Future of Higher Education, "A test of leadership:Charting the future of U.S" U.S. Department of Education. 2006