개발부담금의 형평성 이슈, 장단점, 법적 근거, 미국의 사례 = Equity Issues, Advantage and Disadvantage, Legal Foundation, and Actual Practice of Impact Fees in the U.S.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper theoretically explores the ethical issues and advantage versus disadvantage of impact fees, the legal foundation of impact fees, and the actual practice of adopting impact fees in the U.S. Regarding the cost of past growth, it can be asked why new residents should bear impact fees when existing residents never had to do so. Impact fees will place greater burdens on developments that have low and moderate-income housing. Developers may be forced to build less low/moderate income housing and concentrate on more expensive development. Such moves may reduce the potential supplies of low/moderate housing. Furthermore, the effect of impact fees on the existing housing may be even more important. The prices of existing housing will increase as new housing become more expensive. Ultimately, the provision of low/moderate income housing will be reduced. Consideration should be given to the possible effect of impact fees on the housing needs of low-income people. Besides the lack of affordable housing provision, another prospective consequence of the imposition of impact fees is that some potential new residents are simply priced out of the housing market, thus perpetuate economic exclusion. This fact may result in encouraging homogeneity of community and discouraging socioeconomic diversification.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 류연택, "도시 주택 및 거주지 분리에 관한 이론적 고찰" 한국도시지리학회 16 (16): 195-211, 2013

2 Wellner, A. S., "Who’s Buying for the Home: Who Spends How Much on Products and Services for the Home" New Strategist 1996

3 류연택, "Theoretical Reflections on the Political Economy Perspectives on Urban Housing and Urbanization" 한국도시지리학회 17 (17): 163-176, 2014

4 류연택, "Theoretical Reflections on New Urban Development, Financing Urban Public Facilities, and Impact Fees" 한국도시지리학회 18 (18): 183-196, 2015

5 Delaney, J. J., "The needs-nexus analysis: a unified test for validating subdivision exactions, user impact fees and linkage" 50 (50): 5-194, 1987

6 Lillydahl, J. H., "The need for a standard state impact fee enabling act" 54 (54): 7-15, 1988

7 Kelsey, T. W., "The fiscal impacts of alternative land uses: what do costs of community service studies really tell us?" 27 (27): 78-89, 1996

8 Burge, G., "The capitalization effects of school, residential, and commercial impact fees on undeveloped land values" 44 : 1-13, 2014

9 Altshuler, A. A., "Regulation for Revenue: The Political Economy of Land Use Exactions" Brookings Institution 1993

10 Gowder, W., "Recent developments in exactions and impact fees: who pays for new schools, fair housing, and clean air?" 42 (42): 615-625, 2010

11 Burge, G., "Promoting sustainable land development patterns through impact fee programs" 15 (15): 83-105, 2013

12 Barnebey, M. P., "Paying for growth: community approaches to development impact fees" 54 (54): 18-28, 1988

13 Stroud, N., "Legal considerations of development impact fees" 54 (54): 29-37, 1988

14 Brueckner, J. K., "Infrastructure financing and urban development: the economics of impact fees" 66 (66): 383-407, 1997

15 Bogard, A., "Impact fees in a small Texas city" 6 : 15-18, 1990

16 Mulcahy, C. C., "Impact fees for a developing Wisconsin" 79 (79): 759-817, 1996

17 Burge, G., "Impact fees and singlefamily home construction" 60 (60): 284-306, 2006

18 Been, V., "Impact fees and housing affordability" 8 (8): 139-185, 2005

19 National Association of Home Builders, "Impact Fee Handbook" Home Builder Press 1997

20 O’Connell, L., "Exploring the contribution of state and local-level conditions to the adoption of different types of smart growth policies and impact fees in the United States" 35 (35): 194-203, 2012

21 Taub, T. C., "Exactions, linkage, and regulatory takings" 20 (20): 515-540, 1988

22 Levine, J. C., "Equity in infrastructure finance: when are impact fees justified" 70 (70): 210-222, 1994

23 Burge, G., "Effects of proportionate share impact fees" 18 (18): 679-710, 2007

24 Mathur, S., "Do impact fees raise the price of existing housing?" 18 (18): 635-659, 2007

25 Mathur, S., "Do all impact fees affect housing prices the same?" 33 (33): 442-455, 2013

26 Sheridan, P. G., "Development impact fees in the 1990s" (Fall) : 30-37, 1992

27 Burchell, R. W., "Development Impact Assessment Handbook" Urban Land Institute 1994

28 Finkle, J. A., "Development Fees: Sharing the Costs of Growth"

29 Burge, G., "Can development impact fees help mitigate urban sprawl?" 79 (79): 235-248, 2013

30 Young, D., "Alternatives to Sprawl" Lincoln Institute of Land Policy 1995

31 Nicholas, J. C., "A Practitioner’s Guide to Development Impact Fees" Planners Press 1991