RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      상주국제승마경기장 사업의 경제적 편익 = Estimating the benefit of constructing the international horse riding arena at Sangju

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104377975

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study evaluates the economic benefit of the project constructing the international riding arena having been built at Sangju in Gyeongsangbuk-Do by the willingness to pay (WTP) of residents in the province. As the evaluation method, the dichotomous choice contingent valuation method (CVM) is adopted with the additional questions of whether his/her WTP is zero, to improve the statistical accuracy of evaluation results. Considering the arena's administrative location, the population of the surveys for analysis is confined to residents of Daegu and Gyeongsangbuk-do. The survey is conducted through personal interviews. It turns out that the WTP per household per year is evaluated as 1,847 won and the total yearly benefit of the Sangju international horse riding arena is estimated as 3.56 billion won.
      번역하기

      This study evaluates the economic benefit of the project constructing the international riding arena having been built at Sangju in Gyeongsangbuk-Do by the willingness to pay (WTP) of residents in the province. As the evaluation method, the dichotomou...

      This study evaluates the economic benefit of the project constructing the international riding arena having been built at Sangju in Gyeongsangbuk-Do by the willingness to pay (WTP) of residents in the province. As the evaluation method, the dichotomous choice contingent valuation method (CVM) is adopted with the additional questions of whether his/her WTP is zero, to improve the statistical accuracy of evaluation results. Considering the arena's administrative location, the population of the surveys for analysis is confined to residents of Daegu and Gyeongsangbuk-do. The survey is conducted through personal interviews. It turns out that the WTP per household per year is evaluated as 1,847 won and the total yearly benefit of the Sangju international horse riding arena is estimated as 3.56 billion won.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 정기호, "영상자료센터 건립사업의 경제적 편익" 한국데이터정보과학회 22 (22): 885-893, 2011

      2 Johnson, B., "Value of public goods from sports stadiums: The CVM approach" 18 : 48-58, 2000

      3 Champ, P., "Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods" 33 : 151-162, 1997

      4 Freeman, III. A., "The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods, 2nd ed." Resources for the Future 2003

      5 Portney, P., "The contingent valuation debate: Why economists should care" 8 : 3-17, 1994

      6 정병준, "R을 활용한 조건부 가치 측정법: 정보 가치 측정 사례 연구" 한국데이터정보과학회 22 (22): 1041-1051, 2011

      7 Groothuis, P., "Public funding of professional sports stadiums: Public choice or civic pride?" 30 : 515-526, 2004

      8 Bishop, R., "Measuring values of extra-market goods: Are indirect measures biased?" 61 : 926-930, 1979

      9 Ready, R., "How do respondents with uncertain willingness to pay answer contingent valuation questions?" 77 : 315-326, 2001

      10 Kwak, S., "Estimating benefit of ecological sports park: Using contingent valuation method" 2008

      1 정기호, "영상자료센터 건립사업의 경제적 편익" 한국데이터정보과학회 22 (22): 885-893, 2011

      2 Johnson, B., "Value of public goods from sports stadiums: The CVM approach" 18 : 48-58, 2000

      3 Champ, P., "Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods" 33 : 151-162, 1997

      4 Freeman, III. A., "The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods, 2nd ed." Resources for the Future 2003

      5 Portney, P., "The contingent valuation debate: Why economists should care" 8 : 3-17, 1994

      6 정병준, "R을 활용한 조건부 가치 측정법: 정보 가치 측정 사례 연구" 한국데이터정보과학회 22 (22): 1041-1051, 2011

      7 Groothuis, P., "Public funding of professional sports stadiums: Public choice or civic pride?" 30 : 515-526, 2004

      8 Bishop, R., "Measuring values of extra-market goods: Are indirect measures biased?" 61 : 926-930, 1979

      9 Ready, R., "How do respondents with uncertain willingness to pay answer contingent valuation questions?" 77 : 315-326, 2001

      10 Kwak, S., "Estimating benefit of ecological sports park: Using contingent valuation method" 2008

      11 Pohang Accelerator Laboratory, "Economic evaluation of the electron accelerator of the 4th generation, research report" Pohang Accelerator Laboratory 2009

      12 Daegu Gyungbuk Development Institute, "Economic benefit of the project constructing Sangju horse riding arena, research report" Daegu Gyungbuk Development Institute 2009

      13 Greene, W., "Econometric analysis, 6th ed." Prentice Hall 2008

      14 Li, C., "Discrete choice under preference uncertainty: An improved structural model for contingent valuation" 28 : 256-269, 1995

      15 Carson, R., "Contingent valuation: A comprehensive bibliography and history" Edward Elgar 2011

      16 Hanley, N., "Choice Modelling Approaches: A superior alternative for environment valuation?" 15 : 435-462, 2001

      17 Korea Development Institute, "A study on value estimation for facilities of culture and science, research report" Korea Development Institute 2004

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.18 1.18 1.07
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.01 0.91 0.911 0.35
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼