한국 행정소송제도와 일본 신행정소송제도의 비교 연구 － 정부안 · 대법원안을 포함하여 － = A Comparative Study on the Korean-Japanese Administrative Suit System

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This article is written about a comparative study on the Korean-Japanese administrative
suit system. Japanese administrative suit system was enacted in 1962.
Thereafter it have not been amended until 2004. Japanese neo-administrative suit
system in 2004 is mainly as follows ; First, it made various new administrative
litigation types. They are called obligatory litigation and injunctive litigation.
Second, the scope of standing was enlarged. Third, the defendant was changed
from administrative agency to administrative subject(e.g. state and local government).
In Korea the administrative suit system is working on revision. And Japanese
one may be the model of Korean neo-administrative suit system.
Therefore, I aim for a comparative study on the Korean-Japanese administrative
suit system. Through the study we may acquire many suggestions about the revision
of Korean administrative suit system.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This article is written about a comparative study on the Korean-Japanese administrative
suit system. Japanese administrative suit system was enacted in 1962.
Thereafter it have not been amended until 2004. Japanese neo-administrative suit
system in 2004 is mainly as follows ; First, it made various new administrative
litigation types. They are called obligatory litigation and injunctive litigation.
Second, the scope of standing was enlarged. Third, the defendant was changed
from administrative agency to administrative subject(e.g. state and local government).
In Korea the administrative suit system is working on revision. And Japanese
one may be the model of Korean neo-administrative suit system.
Therefore, I aim for a comparative study on the Korean-Japanese administrative
suit system. Through the study we may acquire many suggestions about the revision
of Korean administrative suit system.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 東京高判, 43 (43): 575-, 1992

2 最高裁, (1122) : 110-, 1984

3 最高裁, (1474) : 68-, 1993

4 東京地判, 13 (13): 2127-, 1962

5 東京地判, 15 (15): 878-, 1964

6 大阪地判, 9 (9): 1662-, 1958

7 神戸地判, 24 (24): 877-, 1973

8 東京地判, (1043) : 91-, 1981

9 東京地判, (1791) : 3-, 2001

10 福岡高判, 43 (43): 1356-, 1992

11 鹿児島地判, (1023) : 159-, 1999

12 神戶地判, (549) : 258-, 1984

13 福岡高判, 37 (37): 1009-, 1986

14 大分地判, (997) : 184-, 1998

15 富山地判, (1699) : 120-, 1998

16 최송화, "현행행정소송법의 입법경위" 31 (31): 3-,

17 이상규, "행정쟁송법(제5판), 405쪽"

18 이상규, "행정쟁송법" 법문사 299-, 2000

19 홍정선, "행정법원론(상)" 박영사 789-, 2007

20 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ(제14판), 676쪽"

21 김남진, "행정법Ⅰ" 법문사 652-, 2008

22 홍준형, "행정구제법" 한울아카데미 466-, 2001

23 이철환, "행정구제법" 전남대출판부 306-, 2007

24 김도창, "일반행정법론" 746-747, 1993

25 김철용, "註釋 行政訴訟法, 64쪽(최광률 집필)"

26 김철용, "註釋 行政訴訟法, 300쪽(이홍훈 집필)"

27 김철용, "註釋 行政訴訟法" 297-,

28 김철용, "註釋 行政訴訟法" 296-,

29 橋本博之, "解説 改正行政事件訴訟法, 113-114쪽"

30 小早川 光郎, "行政法講義 下Ⅲ" 弘文堂 301-302, 2007

31 柳瀬良幹, "行政法教科書" 有斐閣 163-, 1969

32 南 博方, "行政事件訴訟法" 弘文堂 6-7, 2003

33 南 博方, "条解 行政事件訴訟法(第2版), 78-79쪽(人見 剛 집필)"

34 南 博方, "条解 行政事件訴訟法(第2版), 290쪽(藤山 雅行 집필)"

35 南 博方, "条解 行政事件訴訟法(第2版), 288쪽(藤山 雅行 집필)"

36 김남진, "日本의 行政事件訴訟法改正과 韓國의 行政訴訟法改正案" (2) : 15-, 2005

37 田中二郞, "新版 行政法 上卷" 有斐閣 300-, 1974

38 小早川 光郎, "抗告訴訟の本質と体系(『行政法大系(4)』)" 有斐閣 160-, 1984

39 宮崎良夫, "平野事件(『法律事件百選』)" 有斐閣 34-, 1988

40 宮崎良夫, "“平野事件”, 35쪽"