RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      L2 Reading Strategies and Gender: A Study of Korean EFL University Students

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104839869

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The main purpose of the study is to investigate gender difference in the frequency and pattern of reading strategy use and to see if the gender difference exists, if any, across reading proficiency level. Four hundred sixty six university students who...

      The main purpose of the study is to investigate gender difference in the frequency and pattern of reading strategy use and to see if the gender difference exists, if any, across reading proficiency level. Four hundred sixty six university students who were enrolled in two Korean universities located in Seoul participated in the study. Two major instruments were utilized in the current study. First, the reading strategy survey adapted from Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS; Mokhtari & Sheorey 2002) was administered to the participants to measure their perceived use of reading strategies. Second, a reading comprehension test was used to assess the participants' English reading ability. It was found that there was no considerable differences in the pattern of strategy use between the two groups. However, the results of independent samples t-tests revealed that the female students used reading strategies significantly more often than the male students in general. Then, a multiple analysis of variance was conducted to see if there was gender difference in the three dependent variables (global, problem-solving, and support strategy). The results showed that there was no significant gender difference in the use of global and problem-solving strategies, but there existed a significant gender difference in the use of support strategy and the difference was consistent across the reading proficiency level. It was concluded that the female students showed a higher use of reading strategies in general, particularly in the use of support strategy than the male students, and this tendency was consistent across reading proficiency level.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Lee, S. W., "Vocabulary learning strategies of Korean university students: Strategy use, vocabulary size, and gender" 62 (62): 149-169, 2007

      2 Oxford, R., "Vive la difference? Reflections on sex differences in use of language learning strategies" 21 : 321-329, 1988

      3 Oxford, R., "Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students" 73 : 292-300, 1989

      4 Brantmeier, C., "The relationship between readers' gender, passage content, comprehension and strategy use in reading Spanish as a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation" Bloomington 2000

      5 Jimenez, R. T., "The reading strategies of bilingual students who?are successful English readers: Opportunities and obstacles" 31 : 90-112, 1996

      6 Raymond, P. M., "The effects of structure strategy training on the recall of expository prose for university students reading French as a second language" 77 : 445-458, 1993

      7 Schueller, J., "The effect of tow types of strategic training on foreign language reading comprehension: An analysis by gender and proficiency" University of Wisconsin-Madison 1999

      8 Mahnke, K., "The Heinemann TOEFL preparation course" Macmillan/Heinemann 1996

      9 Kletzien, S. B., "Strategy use by good and poor comprehenders reading expository text of differing levels" 26 (26): 67-86, 1991

      10 Wolf, D. F., "Some assumptions about second language text comprehension" 77 : 473-489, 1987

      1 Lee, S. W., "Vocabulary learning strategies of Korean university students: Strategy use, vocabulary size, and gender" 62 (62): 149-169, 2007

      2 Oxford, R., "Vive la difference? Reflections on sex differences in use of language learning strategies" 21 : 321-329, 1988

      3 Oxford, R., "Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students" 73 : 292-300, 1989

      4 Brantmeier, C., "The relationship between readers' gender, passage content, comprehension and strategy use in reading Spanish as a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation" Bloomington 2000

      5 Jimenez, R. T., "The reading strategies of bilingual students who?are successful English readers: Opportunities and obstacles" 31 : 90-112, 1996

      6 Raymond, P. M., "The effects of structure strategy training on the recall of expository prose for university students reading French as a second language" 77 : 445-458, 1993

      7 Schueller, J., "The effect of tow types of strategic training on foreign language reading comprehension: An analysis by gender and proficiency" University of Wisconsin-Madison 1999

      8 Mahnke, K., "The Heinemann TOEFL preparation course" Macmillan/Heinemann 1996

      9 Kletzien, S. B., "Strategy use by good and poor comprehenders reading expository text of differing levels" 26 (26): 67-86, 1991

      10 Wolf, D. F., "Some assumptions about second language text comprehension" 77 : 473-489, 1987

      11 Carrell, P., "Second language reading: Reading ability or language proficiency" 12 : 156-179, 1991

      12 Kern, R., "Second language reading strategy instruction: Its effects on comprehension and word inference ability" 73 : 135-146, 1989

      13 Brantmeier, C., "Second language reading strategies research at the secondary and university levels: Variations, disparities, and generalizability [Electronic Version]. The Reading Matrix 2, 1-14. Retrieved Dec 11, 2007 from http://www.readingmatrix.com/current.html"

      14 Song, M. J., "Reading strategies and second language reading ability: The magnitude of relationship" 54 (54): 73-95, 1998

      15 Johnston, P. H., "Reading comprehension assessment: A cognitive basis" International Reading Association 1983

      16 Garner, R., "Metacognition and reading comprehension" Ablex Publishing Corporation 1987

      17 Flavell, J. H., "Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry" 34 : 906-911, 1979

      18 Carrell, P., "Metacognition and EFL/ESL reading" 26 : 97-112, 1998

      19 Mokhtari, K., "Measuring ESL students' awareness of reading strategies" 25 (25): 2-10, 2002

      20 Oxford, R., "Learning a language by satellite: What influences achievement" 21 : 31-48, 1993

      21 Cohen, A. D., "Language learning: Insights for learners, teachers, and researchers" Newbury House Publishers 1990

      22 Anderson, N., "Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing" 75 : 460-472, 1991

      23 Kozminsky, E., "How do general knowledge and reading strategies ability relate to reading comprehension of high school students at different educational levels" 24 : 187-204, 2001

      24 Maeng, U.K., "How are reading strategies used in different reading stages" 61 (61): 185-204, 2006

      25 Chavez, M., "Gender in the language classroom" McGraw Hill 2001

      26 Anderson, N., "Exploring second language reading: Issues and strategies" Newbury House 1999

      27 Chavez, M., "English native speakers reading German: Syntactic versus semantic problems and strategic behavior" 32 : 321-333, 1994

      28 Sheorey, R., "Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers" 29 : 431-449, 2001

      29 Grant, R., "Comprehension strategy instruction: Basic considerations for instructing at?risk college students" 38 : 42-48, 1994

      30 Gear, J., "Cambridge preparation for the TOEFL test" Cambridge University Press 1996

      31 Paris, S. G., "Becoming a strategies reader" 8 : 293-316, 1983

      32 Mokhtari, K., "Assessing students' metacogntive awareness of reading strategies" 94 : 249-259, 2002

      33 Sheorey, R., "An examination of language learning strategy use in the setting of an indigenized variety of English" 27 : 173-190, 1999

      34 Young, D. J., "A gender?related analysis of strategies used to process input in the native language and a foreign language" 8 : 43-73, 1997

      35 Green, J. M., "A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender" 29 : 261-297, 1995

      36 Phakiti, A., "A closer look at gender and strategy use in L2 reading" 53 (53): 649-702, 2003

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-31 학회명변경 영문명 : British And American Language And Literature Association Of Korea -> The British and American Language and Literature Association of Korea KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.21 0.21 0.15
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.15 0.14 0.414 0.14
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼