RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      건설기술용역 발주 및 입·낙찰 방식의 문제점 및 개선방안 = Improvement of Architecture-Engineering Service Procurement System for Public Construction Project

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100927392

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Various procurement systems for Architecture-Engineering service for public construction project are currently established by construction-related law. However, comprehensive framework and criteria for the selection of Architecture-Engineering firm are in absence. Even though various selection methods for Architecture-Engineering service are currently established by law, cost-based selection method is mainly used in selecting Architecture-Engineering firm for the service. This paper examined current use of procurement system for Architecture-Engineering service and drew problems in practice. Through analysis of problems and bench-marking of those systems in advanced countries and international organizations, several strategies to improve performance of Architecture-Engineering service and to maximize the efficiency were suggested. The suggestions include framework and guideline to select a procurement method for the service which is being considered for the project and way of improving current procurement system. These suggestions will be a foundation for utilizing appropriate procurement system for the specific project and can make domestic Architecture-Engineering firm more competitive in the global market by breaking form the cost-based selection method in the selection of Architecture-Engineering firms.
      번역하기

      Various procurement systems for Architecture-Engineering service for public construction project are currently established by construction-related law. However, comprehensive framework and criteria for the selection of Architecture-Engineering firm ar...

      Various procurement systems for Architecture-Engineering service for public construction project are currently established by construction-related law. However, comprehensive framework and criteria for the selection of Architecture-Engineering firm are in absence. Even though various selection methods for Architecture-Engineering service are currently established by law, cost-based selection method is mainly used in selecting Architecture-Engineering firm for the service. This paper examined current use of procurement system for Architecture-Engineering service and drew problems in practice. Through analysis of problems and bench-marking of those systems in advanced countries and international organizations, several strategies to improve performance of Architecture-Engineering service and to maximize the efficiency were suggested. The suggestions include framework and guideline to select a procurement method for the service which is being considered for the project and way of improving current procurement system. These suggestions will be a foundation for utilizing appropriate procurement system for the specific project and can make domestic Architecture-Engineering firm more competitive in the global market by breaking form the cost-based selection method in the selection of Architecture-Engineering firms.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 조건희, "최저통합환산가격 개념을 적용한 기술제안 기반 입찰제도" 한국건설관리학회 11 (11): 94-105, 2010

      2 여상구, "기술제안입찰형 최고가치 낙찰제도 입찰자 평가체계에 관한 연구" 한국건설관리학회 11 (11): 124-136, 2010

      3 정녕호, "건설사업관리자의 수행업무에 따른 선관주의의무 특성" 한국건설관리학회 13 (13): 36-43, 2012

      4 Jung, W. Y., "Value Creation of Construction Technology according to Paradigm Shift of Delivery System" KICEM 150-, 2012

      5 Ministry of Construction & Transportation, "Study of Improvements for Public Offering and Design Competitions of Construction Engineering & Architecture Design Project" 2007

      6 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport, "Statistics annual report 2012, 2013"

      7 World Bank, "Procurement of Works & User’s Guide"

      8 GSA, "Federal Aquisition Regulation"

      9 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport, "Evaluation and Selection Guide for Design Service"

      10 KRIHS, "Diversification of the Governmental Construction Project Delivery System: Reshaping Institutional Arrangements and Enhancing Institutional Capacity"

      1 조건희, "최저통합환산가격 개념을 적용한 기술제안 기반 입찰제도" 한국건설관리학회 11 (11): 94-105, 2010

      2 여상구, "기술제안입찰형 최고가치 낙찰제도 입찰자 평가체계에 관한 연구" 한국건설관리학회 11 (11): 124-136, 2010

      3 정녕호, "건설사업관리자의 수행업무에 따른 선관주의의무 특성" 한국건설관리학회 13 (13): 36-43, 2012

      4 Jung, W. Y., "Value Creation of Construction Technology according to Paradigm Shift of Delivery System" KICEM 150-, 2012

      5 Ministry of Construction & Transportation, "Study of Improvements for Public Offering and Design Competitions of Construction Engineering & Architecture Design Project" 2007

      6 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport, "Statistics annual report 2012, 2013"

      7 World Bank, "Procurement of Works & User’s Guide"

      8 GSA, "Federal Aquisition Regulation"

      9 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport, "Evaluation and Selection Guide for Design Service"

      10 KRIHS, "Diversification of the Governmental Construction Project Delivery System: Reshaping Institutional Arrangements and Enhancing Institutional Capacity"

      11 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport, "Construction Technology Management Act·Enforcement Degree·Enforcement regulations"

      12 USACE, "Architect-Engineer Contracting in USACE (EP 715-1-7)"

      13 KOTRA, "ADB Project Guide"

      14 KENCA, "A study for Improvements Engineering Industry successful bid system"

      15 Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, "A Study on the Development Plans for improvements of Construction Engineering system and reinforcement of technical competitiveness" 2009

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-12-23 학술지명변경 한글명 : 건설관리 -> 한국건설관리학회 논문집 KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.54 0.54 0.54
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.53 0.5 0.772 0.22
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼