RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    미등록 아동 방지를 위한 출생등록될 권리의 법제화 방안 - 헌법재판소와 대법원의 해석 차이와 입법적 대응 - = Legal Reform Measures for Ensuring the Right to Birth Registration to Prevent Unregistered Children: Differences in Interpretation between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court and Legislative Responses

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110219723

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper analyzes the divergent interpretations of the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of Korea with respect to the legislative institutionalization of the “right to birth registration” as a means of preventing unregistered children, and proposes directions for future legislative responses. The point of departure is the recognition that, although birth registration constitutes a prerequisite for human dignity and the protection of fundamental rights, migrant children and children born outside of marriage remain in a legal blind spot under the current domestic system. While the birth notification system and the protected childbirth system, which took effect in July 2024, are expected to alleviate these problems to some extent, the effectiveness of the system is concentrated on children with Korean nationality, and a protection gap for foreign and migrant children still exists.
    The Constitutional Court recognizes the right to birth registration as an unenumerated constitutional fundamental right, interpreting it as a universal human right grounded in children’s human dignity, the right to life, and the right to equality. In contrast, the Supreme Court adopts a more restrictive approach, emphasizing the procedural requirements of the Family Relationship Registration Act and the principle of the presumption of paternity. This divergence in interpretation carries significant implications for the institutional design necessary to ensure the effective protection of children’s rights.
    Ultimately, the right to birth registration must be institutionally guaranteed as a universal human right, irrespective of nationality, legal status, or marital status of the parents. To this end, legislative reforms are required, including the expansion of eligible registrants, the introduction of ex officio registration mechanisms, and the establishment of a comprehensive protection system for migrant children.
    번역하기

    This paper analyzes the divergent interpretations of the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of Korea with respect to the legislative institutionalization of the “right to birth registration” as a means of preventing unregistered children, ...

    This paper analyzes the divergent interpretations of the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of Korea with respect to the legislative institutionalization of the “right to birth registration” as a means of preventing unregistered children, and proposes directions for future legislative responses. The point of departure is the recognition that, although birth registration constitutes a prerequisite for human dignity and the protection of fundamental rights, migrant children and children born outside of marriage remain in a legal blind spot under the current domestic system. While the birth notification system and the protected childbirth system, which took effect in July 2024, are expected to alleviate these problems to some extent, the effectiveness of the system is concentrated on children with Korean nationality, and a protection gap for foreign and migrant children still exists.
    The Constitutional Court recognizes the right to birth registration as an unenumerated constitutional fundamental right, interpreting it as a universal human right grounded in children’s human dignity, the right to life, and the right to equality. In contrast, the Supreme Court adopts a more restrictive approach, emphasizing the procedural requirements of the Family Relationship Registration Act and the principle of the presumption of paternity. This divergence in interpretation carries significant implications for the institutional design necessary to ensure the effective protection of children’s rights.
    Ultimately, the right to birth registration must be institutionally guaranteed as a universal human right, irrespective of nationality, legal status, or marital status of the parents. To this end, legislative reforms are required, including the expansion of eligible registrants, the introduction of ex officio registration mechanisms, and the establishment of a comprehensive protection system for migrant children.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼