RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Covert Investigations in Data-Saturated Environments: Toward a Normatively Constrained Framework = Regulating Covert Investigations In Data-Saturated Environments: Toward Normative Governance

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110412876

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This article examines how covert investigations are transformed in digitally mediated, data-saturated environments and explores the implications of this shift for the legal regulation of investigative practices. Moving beyond conventional doctrines, the study reconceptualizes covert investigation as an ontological and epistemic process, emphasizing how interaction, access, and informational conditions shape the production and interpretation of evidence.
    The article argues that the traditional distinction between undercover operations and entrapment no longer serves as a stable analytical framework in contemporary investigative environments. As investigative access increasingly depends upon interaction and participation, the boundary between detecting criminal conduct and contributing to its evidentiary emergence becomes more contingent and context-dependent. This development generates forms of normative instability that challenge the adequacy of existing legal categories.
    To address these challenges in data-saturated environments, the article develops a normatively constrained analytical framework that integrates ex ante orientation, process-based documentation, interactional accountability, and ex post reviewability. Rather than relying solely on categorical distinctions between permissible and impermissible conduct, it seeks to structure how investigative practices are evaluated, documented, and subjected to review.
    The study concludes that the regulation of covert investigations must progressively shift from the control of discrete acts to the governance of investigative processes. In digitally mediated environments, the legitimacy of investigative practices depends not only on compliance with legal rules but also on the transparency, accountability, and reviewability of the processes through which evidentiary significance is produced and interpreted.
    번역하기

    This article examines how covert investigations are transformed in digitally mediated, data-saturated environments and explores the implications of this shift for the legal regulation of investigative practices. Moving beyond conventional doctrines, t...

    This article examines how covert investigations are transformed in digitally mediated, data-saturated environments and explores the implications of this shift for the legal regulation of investigative practices. Moving beyond conventional doctrines, the study reconceptualizes covert investigation as an ontological and epistemic process, emphasizing how interaction, access, and informational conditions shape the production and interpretation of evidence.
    The article argues that the traditional distinction between undercover operations and entrapment no longer serves as a stable analytical framework in contemporary investigative environments. As investigative access increasingly depends upon interaction and participation, the boundary between detecting criminal conduct and contributing to its evidentiary emergence becomes more contingent and context-dependent. This development generates forms of normative instability that challenge the adequacy of existing legal categories.
    To address these challenges in data-saturated environments, the article develops a normatively constrained analytical framework that integrates ex ante orientation, process-based documentation, interactional accountability, and ex post reviewability. Rather than relying solely on categorical distinctions between permissible and impermissible conduct, it seeks to structure how investigative practices are evaluated, documented, and subjected to review.
    The study concludes that the regulation of covert investigations must progressively shift from the control of discrete acts to the governance of investigative processes. In digitally mediated environments, the legitimacy of investigative practices depends not only on compliance with legal rules but also on the transparency, accountability, and reviewability of the processes through which evidentiary significance is produced and interpreted.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼