RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    용도지역·지구제 발전방향 연구 = (A) Study on Ways to Develop the Land Use Zoning System

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9173299

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The contents of this study are principles of regulations stipulated in the Framework Act on Administrative Regulations and ultimate valuation criteria that must be sought in public administration. Based on ideology, which serves as the evaluation criteria for administration, the principle of land use zoning system has been subdivided into legality, democracy, efficiency, and effectiveness. The purpose of the study is to seek out most advisable ways for developing the land use zoning system by focusing on the most recently enacted Act on Planning and Use of the National Territory based on the aforementioned principles and on individual zoning acts. There have been many studies previously on land use zoning system, but none that analyzes the system within such a framework to come up with development methods.
    Firstly, current situation and problems in Koreas land use zoning system was looked at with focus on principle. In relation to legal system, not only is Koreas land use zoning system not true to the principle of effectiveness, but the related regulations are so complex and divergent that it lowers industrial productivity and inconveniences peoples everyday lives. Furthermore, unsystematic restrictions in the regulations that are not true to the principles of legality and effectiveness are delaying administrative procedures, wasting budget, and creating confusion in land use regulations.
    Secondly, in operation, the inflexibility that does not suit the principle of effectiveness acts as an impediment to making timely adjustments to dynamic changes in the national territory. Further, there are limits to inducing land use that reflects the special characteristics of sites due to across-the-board regulations that do not take geographical location, their special characteristics, and local conditions into consideration sufficiently. Neither can it be said that fairness and democracy are guaranteed in the administrative procedures because participation of the people in the decision-making processes takes place more as a matter of formality.
    Hence, preparation of a system that is true to legality, democracy, efficiency, and effectiveness mentioned above is called for. Ways to develop such a system are proposed as follows.
    On the legal side, areas unnecessarily zoned should be freed for modification of related regulations that are too complex and divergent. Zonings that need to be maintained should come under land use classification in the Act on Planning and Use of the National Territory. It is proposed that these however should be preceded by reorganization of zoning related terminology under individual acts.
    In relation the operation of land use zoning system, the necessary for establishment of a separate organization for reorganization of relevant regulations has been proposed. In addition, strengthening evaluation functions of the land use zoning system, promoting efficiency through flexible application of restrictive regulations, and securing democracy through active participation of the people in making decisions concerning land use zoning have been proposed as a way of further developing the land use zoning system. Transparency in land information and enhanced efficiency via securing of finances and personnel by local governments have been proposed as additional ways of developing the land use zoning system.
    번역하기

    The contents of this study are principles of regulations stipulated in the Framework Act on Administrative Regulations and ultimate valuation criteria that must be sought in public administration. Based on ideology, which serves as the evaluation crit...

    The contents of this study are principles of regulations stipulated in the Framework Act on Administrative Regulations and ultimate valuation criteria that must be sought in public administration. Based on ideology, which serves as the evaluation criteria for administration, the principle of land use zoning system has been subdivided into legality, democracy, efficiency, and effectiveness. The purpose of the study is to seek out most advisable ways for developing the land use zoning system by focusing on the most recently enacted Act on Planning and Use of the National Territory based on the aforementioned principles and on individual zoning acts. There have been many studies previously on land use zoning system, but none that analyzes the system within such a framework to come up with development methods.
    Firstly, current situation and problems in Koreas land use zoning system was looked at with focus on principle. In relation to legal system, not only is Koreas land use zoning system not true to the principle of effectiveness, but the related regulations are so complex and divergent that it lowers industrial productivity and inconveniences peoples everyday lives. Furthermore, unsystematic restrictions in the regulations that are not true to the principles of legality and effectiveness are delaying administrative procedures, wasting budget, and creating confusion in land use regulations.
    Secondly, in operation, the inflexibility that does not suit the principle of effectiveness acts as an impediment to making timely adjustments to dynamic changes in the national territory. Further, there are limits to inducing land use that reflects the special characteristics of sites due to across-the-board regulations that do not take geographical location, their special characteristics, and local conditions into consideration sufficiently. Neither can it be said that fairness and democracy are guaranteed in the administrative procedures because participation of the people in the decision-making processes takes place more as a matter of formality.
    Hence, preparation of a system that is true to legality, democracy, efficiency, and effectiveness mentioned above is called for. Ways to develop such a system are proposed as follows.
    On the legal side, areas unnecessarily zoned should be freed for modification of related regulations that are too complex and divergent. Zonings that need to be maintained should come under land use classification in the Act on Planning and Use of the National Territory. It is proposed that these however should be preceded by reorganization of zoning related terminology under individual acts.
    In relation the operation of land use zoning system, the necessary for establishment of a separate organization for reorganization of relevant regulations has been proposed. In addition, strengthening evaluation functions of the land use zoning system, promoting efficiency through flexible application of restrictive regulations, and securing democracy through active participation of the people in making decisions concerning land use zoning have been proposed as a way of further developing the land use zoning system. Transparency in land information and enhanced efficiency via securing of finances and personnel by local governments have been proposed as additional ways of developing the land use zoning system.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차 = ⅰ
    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 제1절 연구의 목적 = 1
    • 제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법 = 3
    • 제2장 용도지역·지구제의 이론적 고찰 = 6
    • 목차 = ⅰ
    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 제1절 연구의 목적 = 1
    • 제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법 = 3
    • 제2장 용도지역·지구제의 이론적 고찰 = 6
    • 제1절 용도지역·지구제의 개념 및 목적 = 6
    • 1. 용도지역·지구제의 개념 = 6
    • 2. 용도지역·지구제의 목적 = 9
    • 제2절 용도지역·지구제의 원칙 = 11
    • 1. 합법성 = 12
    • 2. 민주성 = 13
    • 3. 실효성 = 14
    • 4. 효과성 = 14
    • 제3절 용도지역·지구제의 역사적 변천 = 15
    • 제4절 용도지역·지구제의 종류 = 20
    • 1. 누적식 용도지역제 (Euclidean Zoning) = 20
    • 2. 비누적식 용도지역제 (Non Euclidean Zoning) = 21
    • 3. 유연용도지역제 (Flexible Zoning) = 22
    • 4. 혼합용도지역제 (Mixed land use Zoning) = 24
    • 제5절 선행연구의 개요 = 25
    • 제6절 분석의 틀 = 30
    • 제3장 용도지역·지구제의 실태분석 = 32
    • 제1절 용도지역·지구제 관련법률 현황 = 32
    • 1. 소관부처벌 현황 = 32
    • 2. 분야별 현황 = 34
    • 제2절 국토의계획및이용에관한법률상의 용도지역·지구제 = 36
    • 1. 지역·지구의 종류 = 36
    • 2. 지역·지구의 지정절차 = 40
    • 3. 지역·지구의 지정현황 = 44
    • 4. 지역·지구내에서의 행위제한 = 47
    • 제3절 개별법상의 용도지역·지구제 = 54
    • 1. 지역·지구의 종류 = 54
    • 2. 지역·지구의 지정 절차 = 59
    • 3. 지역·지구의 지정 현황 = 60
    • 4. 지역·지구내에서의 행위 제한 = 61
    • 제4장 용도지역·지구제의 문제점 = 63
    • 제1절 문제의 본질 = 63
    • 제2절 법체계상의 문제점 = 66
    • 1. 관련법령의 복잡다기화 = 66
    • 2. 비체계적인 행위규제 = 67
    • 3. 상·하위규정의 상충 = 69
    • 제3절 운영상의 문제점 = 70
    • 1. 제도운영의 경직성 = 70
    • 2. 획일적인 행위규제 = 73
    • 3. 형식적 주민참여 절차 = 75
    • 제5장 용도지역·지구제의 발전방향 = 78
    • 제1절 법체계의 정비 = 78
    • 1. 개별구역의 정비 및 폐지 = 78
    • 2. 개별구역을 용도지역으로 흡수 = 79
    • 3. 개별구역의 용어정비 = 80
    • 제2절 운용방식의 개선 = 82
    • 1. 관련법령 정비를 위한 별도기구 마련·운영 = 82
    • 2. 용도지역·지구제의 평가기능 강화 = 83
    • 3. 행위규제의 탄력적 적용 = 84
    • 4. 용도지역 결정에 적극적 주민참여 유도 = 87
    • 5. 필지별 투명한 토지정보 제공 = 88
    • 6. 지자체 재정 및 전문인력 확보 = 90
    • 제6장 결론 = 92
    • 참고문헌 = 96
    • ABSTRACT = 99
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼