RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 AHCI SCOPUS

      The Horak Debate from the Reign of King Sukjong to King Sunjo

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104097108

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The Horak debate was a philosophical discussion that originated among Noron scholars who aspired to refine the logic of Neo-Confucianism. The first round of this controversy took place in the early eighteenth century, a time in which the political and philosophical dominance of the Noron faction was widely recognized throughout the Joseon dynasty. Then, Song Si-yeol’s students, divided into those who established a presence in the capital city Hanseong and those who did so in Chungcheong-do province, began to express conflicting opinions regarding the conclusions of the controversy. The differences between the two groups mainly stemmed from the issue of correctly interpreting the logic of Neo-Confucianism, and such differences later caused divisions of several academic schools and political parties within the Noron faction. The second round of the Horak debate occurred during King Yeongjo’s reign. From the onset of his reign, Yeongjo consistently argued that politics and philosophy were two distinct fields, and such an emphasis contributed to the significant divergence between the Ho-ron and Nak-ron scholars over the relationship between academia and politics. This time around, the Ho-ron group and the Nak-ron group each established its own identity as an academic school and began to criticize each other in a rather harsh manner in connection with political parties within the central government. Through the debate, philosophical differences evidently manifested themselves in the area of political ideology.
      번역하기

      The Horak debate was a philosophical discussion that originated among Noron scholars who aspired to refine the logic of Neo-Confucianism. The first round of this controversy took place in the early eighteenth century, a time in which the political and...

      The Horak debate was a philosophical discussion that originated among Noron scholars who aspired to refine the logic of Neo-Confucianism. The first round of this controversy took place in the early eighteenth century, a time in which the political and philosophical dominance of the Noron faction was widely recognized throughout the Joseon dynasty. Then, Song Si-yeol’s students, divided into those who established a presence in the capital city Hanseong and those who did so in Chungcheong-do province, began to express conflicting opinions regarding the conclusions of the controversy. The differences between the two groups mainly stemmed from the issue of correctly interpreting the logic of Neo-Confucianism, and such differences later caused divisions of several academic schools and political parties within the Noron faction. The second round of the Horak debate occurred during King Yeongjo’s reign. From the onset of his reign, Yeongjo consistently argued that politics and philosophy were two distinct fields, and such an emphasis contributed to the significant divergence between the Ho-ron and Nak-ron scholars over the relationship between academia and politics. This time around, the Ho-ron group and the Nak-ron group each established its own identity as an academic school and began to criticize each other in a rather harsh manner in connection with political parties within the central government. Through the debate, philosophical differences evidently manifested themselves in the area of political ideology.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이경구, "湖洛論爭을 통해 본 철학논쟁의 사회정치적 의미" 한국사상사학회 (26) : 201-232, 2006

      2 Zhu, Xi, "Zhuzi daquan 朱子大全(The Complete Works of Zhu Xi)" 1165

      3 Lee, Kyungku, "Yeongjo-sunjo yeongan horak nonjaeng-ui jeongae(The Horak Debate during the Reigns of Kings Yeongjo, Jeongjo, and Sunjo)" 93-, 1998

      4 You, Bong-Hak, "Yeonam ilpa bukhak sasang yeongu (A Study of the Yeonam Group’s Northern Learning Philosophy)" Iljisa 1995

      5 Woo, Kyungsup, "Song Si-yeol-ui sedo jeongchi sasang yeongu (Song Si-yeol’s Thoughts of In-law Government)" Seoul National University 2005

      6 Anon., "Sibibyeon 十二辨(Twelve Arguments)"

      7 Yi, Gan, "Oeam yugo 巍巖遺稿(The Posthumous Writings of Oeam Yi Gan)"

      8 Lee, Cheon Sung, "Nongam Kim Chang-hyeop-ui simseongnon-e daehan yeongu(A Study of Nongam Kim Chang-hyeop’s Theory of the Mind-Heart and Human Nature)" Sungkyunkwan University 2003

      9 Han, Won-jin, "Namdangjip 南塘集(The Collected Works of Namdang Han Won-jin)" 1765

      10 Kim, Sangki, "Namdang hakpa-ui hyeongseong-gwa wijeong cheoksa undong(Formation of the Namdang School and the Movement to Defend Orthodoxy and Rejecting Heterodoxy)" 10 : 1999

      1 이경구, "湖洛論爭을 통해 본 철학논쟁의 사회정치적 의미" 한국사상사학회 (26) : 201-232, 2006

      2 Zhu, Xi, "Zhuzi daquan 朱子大全(The Complete Works of Zhu Xi)" 1165

      3 Lee, Kyungku, "Yeongjo-sunjo yeongan horak nonjaeng-ui jeongae(The Horak Debate during the Reigns of Kings Yeongjo, Jeongjo, and Sunjo)" 93-, 1998

      4 You, Bong-Hak, "Yeonam ilpa bukhak sasang yeongu (A Study of the Yeonam Group’s Northern Learning Philosophy)" Iljisa 1995

      5 Woo, Kyungsup, "Song Si-yeol-ui sedo jeongchi sasang yeongu (Song Si-yeol’s Thoughts of In-law Government)" Seoul National University 2005

      6 Anon., "Sibibyeon 十二辨(Twelve Arguments)"

      7 Yi, Gan, "Oeam yugo 巍巖遺稿(The Posthumous Writings of Oeam Yi Gan)"

      8 Lee, Cheon Sung, "Nongam Kim Chang-hyeop-ui simseongnon-e daehan yeongu(A Study of Nongam Kim Chang-hyeop’s Theory of the Mind-Heart and Human Nature)" Sungkyunkwan University 2003

      9 Han, Won-jin, "Namdangjip 南塘集(The Collected Works of Namdang Han Won-jin)" 1765

      10 Kim, Sangki, "Namdang hakpa-ui hyeongseong-gwa wijeong cheoksa undong(Formation of the Namdang School and the Movement to Defend Orthodoxy and Rejecting Heterodoxy)" 10 : 1999

      11 Kim, Tae-neon, "Namdang Han Won-jin-ui ‘jeonghak’ hyeongseong-e daehan yeongu(A Study of the Formation of Namdang Han Won-jin’s “Correct Learning”)" Korea University 2006

      12 "Joseon wangjo sillok 朝鮮王朝實錄(Annals of the Joseon Dynasty)"

      13 Kwon, Oh Young, "Joseon hugi yurim-ui sasang-gwa hwaldong (The Philosophy and Actions of the Yurim Figures in the Latter half period of the Joseon Dynasty)" Dolbegae 2003

      14 Cho, Sung-san, "Joseon hugi nangnongye hakpung-ui hyeongseong-gwa jeongae (The Formation of Nak-ron in the Late Joseon Dynasty: Its Academic Transition and Statecraft Thought)" Jisik Sanupsa 2007

      15 Jung, Ok-Ja, "Joseon hugi joseon junghwa sasang yeongu (A Study of the Sinocentric World View in the Latter Half of the Joseon Dynasty)" Iljisa 1998

      16 Kim, Moon-sik, "Joseon hugi gyeonghak sasang yeongu (A Study of the Chinese Classical Philosophy in the Latter Half of the Joseon Dynasty)" Iljisa 1997

      17 Choe, Seonghwan, "Jeongjodae tangpyeong jeongguk-ui gunsin uiri yeongu(A Study of the Cause of Righteousness between King Jeongjo and his Subjects in the Context of the Tangpyeong Policy)" Seoul National University 2009

      18 Hwang, Yun-seok, "Ijae nango 願齋亂藁(Miscellaneous Writings of Ijae Hwang Yun-seok)"

      19 Anon., "Horak sasil 湖洛事實(Facts about the Horak Debate)"

      20 Moon, Suk-yoon, "Horak nonjaeng hyeongseong-gwa jeongae (The Formation and the Development of the Horak Debate)" Dong-gwa Seo 2006

      21 Anon., "Horak mundap 湖洛問答(Questions and Answers in the Horak Debate)"

      22 Kim, Han-rok, "Hanganjip 寒澗集(The Collected Works of Hangan Kim Han-rok)"

      23 Choe, Seok, "Cheonmun sabaengnok 泉門俟百錄(Waiting For Future Evaluation at Cheonmun)"

      24 Anon., "Buryeogeon 不易言(Words that Cannot be Easily Interpreted)"

      25 "18 segi nangnongye hangmaek-ui byeonmo yangsang yeongu(A Study of the Changes in the Nak-ron School in the 18th Century)" Yeoksa gyoyuk (History Education) 102-, 2007

      26 이경구, "1740년(영조 16) 이후 영조의 정치 운영" 한국역사연구회 (53) : 23-44, 2004

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2018-11-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (기타) KCI등재
      2017-03-07 학회명변경 영문명 : The Academy of Korean -> The Academy of Korean Studies KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 A&HCI 등재 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.19 0.1 0.24
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.19 0.2 0.394 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼