RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      라섹과 에피라식의 단기간 임상결과 분석 = Comparison of Short Term Clinical Results Between LASEK and Epi-LASIK

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100523334

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      `Purpose: To compare short-term clinical results of LASEK and epi-LASIK. Methods: Fifteen subjects (30 eyes) underwent uncomplicated LASEK on one eye and uncomplicated epi- LASIK on the other eye by a single surgeon, and uncorrected visual acuity, ref...

      `Purpose: To compare short-term clinical results of LASEK and epi-LASIK. Methods: Fifteen subjects (30 eyes) underwent uncomplicated LASEK on one eye and uncomplicated epi- LASIK on the other eye by a single surgeon, and uncorrected visual acuity, refractive change, postoperative pain, and postoperative satisfaction were compared at postoperative week one, at one month, and at three months. Results: Postoperative uncorrected visual acuities were 0.68±0.20, 0.96±0.22, and 1.05±0.17 for LASEK and 0.75±0.21, 0.92±0.14, and 1.01±0.21 for epi-LASIK at one week, one month, and three months, respectively. Epi-LASIK showed faster improvement in visual acuity at one week, while LASEK showed faster improvement afterward. However, no statistical significance was found. Spherical equivalet of LASEK was -0.66±1.28D and that of epi-LASIK was -0.61±0.92D at postoperative week one, implying faster refractive recovery for epi-LASIK, but after one month, LASEK was faster in refractive recovery and all these changes were not statistically significant. Durations of postoperative pain were 3.13±1.25 days for LASEK and 3.02±1.32 days for epi-LASIK. Pain scores (0~10 point scale), however, were also lower for LASEK by 0.33 point, 0.57 point, and 0.45 point for postoperative day 1, 2, and 3, respectively. No statistical significance was noted in either pain duration or pain score. When asked for overall satisfaction, six subjects preferred LASIK, four subjects preferred epi-LASIK, and five subjects showed no preference. Conclusions: Both LASEK and epi-LASIK are effective for surgical correction of myopia, and no significant difference in visual recovery, refractive change or degree of postoperative pain was noted in this study.`

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Kim SY, "Twenty percent alcohol toxicity on rabbit corneal epithelial cells: electron microscopic study" 21 : 388-392, 2002

      2 Kamm O, "The relation between structure and physiological action of the alcohols" 10 : 87-92, 1921

      3 Kwon HL, "Short Term Clinical Results of Laser Epithelial Keratomileusis and epi-Laser in Situ Keratomileusis for Moderate and High Myopia" 10 : 1711-1717, 2005

      4 O’ Doherty M, "Postoperative Pain Following epi-LASIK, LASEK, and PRK for Myopia" 23 : 133-138, 2007

      5 Hersh PS, "Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia" 105 : 1513-1523, 1998

      6 Seiler T, "Myopic photorefractive keratectomy with excimer laser: one-year follow-up" 98 : 1156-1163, 1991

      7 Carones F, "Mechanical versus alcohol epithelial removal during photorefractive keratectomy" 15 : 556-562, 1999

      8 Trokel SL, "Excimer laser surgery of the cornea" 96 : 710-715, 1983

      9 Gartry DS, "Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy: 18 months follow-up" 99 : 1209-1219, 1992

      10 Pallikaris IG, "Epi-LASIK: Comparative histological evaluation of mechanical and alcohol- assisted epithelial separation" 29 : 1496-1501, 2003

      1 Kim SY, "Twenty percent alcohol toxicity on rabbit corneal epithelial cells: electron microscopic study" 21 : 388-392, 2002

      2 Kamm O, "The relation between structure and physiological action of the alcohols" 10 : 87-92, 1921

      3 Kwon HL, "Short Term Clinical Results of Laser Epithelial Keratomileusis and epi-Laser in Situ Keratomileusis for Moderate and High Myopia" 10 : 1711-1717, 2005

      4 O’ Doherty M, "Postoperative Pain Following epi-LASIK, LASEK, and PRK for Myopia" 23 : 133-138, 2007

      5 Hersh PS, "Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia" 105 : 1513-1523, 1998

      6 Seiler T, "Myopic photorefractive keratectomy with excimer laser: one-year follow-up" 98 : 1156-1163, 1991

      7 Carones F, "Mechanical versus alcohol epithelial removal during photorefractive keratectomy" 15 : 556-562, 1999

      8 Trokel SL, "Excimer laser surgery of the cornea" 96 : 710-715, 1983

      9 Gartry DS, "Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy: 18 months follow-up" 99 : 1209-1219, 1992

      10 Pallikaris IG, "Epi-LASIK: Comparative histological evaluation of mechanical and alcohol- assisted epithelial separation" 29 : 1496-1501, 2003

      11 Abad JC, "Dilute ethanol versus mechanical debridement before photorefractive keratectomy" 22 : 1427-1433, 1996

      12 Seiler T, "Complications of myopic photorefractive keratectomy with the excimer laser" 101 : 153-160, 1994

      13 Wang Z, "Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy to correct myopia from 1.25 to 6.00 diopters" 13 : 528-534, 1997

      14 Lee JB, "Comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for low to moderate myopia" 27 : 565-570, 2001

      15 Kim HJ, "Clinical results of Laser epithelial keratomileusis and Laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate and high myopia" 44 : 1159-1164, 2003

      16 Stein HA, "Alcohol removal of the epithelium for excimer laser ablation: outcomes analysis" 23 : 1160-1163, 1997

      17 Lee SB, "Advanced Surface Ablation-Photorefractive Keratectomy (ASA-PRK): Safety and Clinical Outcome for the Correction of Mild to Moderate Myopia with a Thin Cornea" 47 : 1274-1286, 2006

      18 Abad JC, "A prospective evaluation of alcohol-assisted versus mechanical epithelial removal before photorefractive keratectomy" 104 : 1566-1574, 1997

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.22 0.22 0.22
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.23 0.23 0.366 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼