RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    부채비율과 자산 형태의 관련성 = Debt Ratio an Assets Pattern

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3007365

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Capital Structure Puzzle is still a hot issue in finance theory and practice for 60-70 years. However, there are some checklists and guidelines for choosing capital structure which is, in more detail, debt ratio in the firms. Tax, risk, the portion of intangible assets, and financial slack are the guideline for accepting debt capacity which is accepted in theory and practice in the USA. The paper is discussed mainly the relationship between the portion of intangible assets and debt ratio.
    The motivation for this study is that the empirical finding in Korea hinted by Long & Malitz(1985a, 1985b), In more details, the paper is focused on the relationship between financial leverage and portion of intangible assets, portion of fixed assets, and profitability. The proxy variable for financial leverage is debt ratio, while the proxies for portion of intangible assets are R&D/sales, advertisement expenditure/sales. The proxies for tangible assets are portion for fixed asset, capital expenditure. The proxy for profitability is return on total assets. The model for empirical evidence is the regression model.
    The empirical findings are as followings. (1) Debt ratio is negatively correlated with portion of intangible asset such as R&D/sales and advertisement expenditure/sales which is supported by Long & Malitz(1985a, 1985d), However, there is no explanatory power for debt capacity using such variables as portion of tangible assets and profitability.

    번역하기

    Capital Structure Puzzle is still a hot issue in finance theory and practice for 60-70 years. However, there are some checklists and guidelines for choosing capital structure which is, in more detail, debt ratio in the firms. Tax, risk, the portion of...

    Capital Structure Puzzle is still a hot issue in finance theory and practice for 60-70 years. However, there are some checklists and guidelines for choosing capital structure which is, in more detail, debt ratio in the firms. Tax, risk, the portion of intangible assets, and financial slack are the guideline for accepting debt capacity which is accepted in theory and practice in the USA. The paper is discussed mainly the relationship between the portion of intangible assets and debt ratio.
    The motivation for this study is that the empirical finding in Korea hinted by Long & Malitz(1985a, 1985b), In more details, the paper is focused on the relationship between financial leverage and portion of intangible assets, portion of fixed assets, and profitability. The proxy variable for financial leverage is debt ratio, while the proxies for portion of intangible assets are R&D/sales, advertisement expenditure/sales. The proxies for tangible assets are portion for fixed asset, capital expenditure. The proxy for profitability is return on total assets. The model for empirical evidence is the regression model.
    The empirical findings are as followings. (1) Debt ratio is negatively correlated with portion of intangible asset such as R&D/sales and advertisement expenditure/sales which is supported by Long & Malitz(1985a, 1985d), However, there is no explanatory power for debt capacity using such variables as portion of tangible assets and profitability.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ.서론
    • Ⅱ.이론적 배경
    • Ⅲ.실증 연구
    • Ⅳ.결론
    • 참고문헌
    • Ⅰ.서론
    • Ⅱ.이론적 배경
    • Ⅲ.실증 연구
    • Ⅳ.결론
    • 참고문헌
    • SUMMARY
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼