RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      이언 맥닐과 아일랜드 민족주의 운동 = Eoin MacNeill and the Irish Nationalist Movement

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102001764

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This research is an effort to examine Eoin MacNeill’s nationalistic creed by focusing on his role and influence in the Irish Nationalist Movement in fin-de-siecle Ireland. MacNeill was a leading nationalist of the day who actively took part in both cultural and militaristic movements. His contribution in constructing and developing the Gaelic League and the Irish Volunteers, both essential organizations of the movement, was part of his effort to deal with the division of Ireland and indifference of Irish public to nationalist movement. However, despite such leading role in promoting Irish Nationalism, his importance has been underestimated by many Irish historians. In most cases he has been portrayed as an ‘indecisive leader’ or ‘one who was responsible for the failure of the Easter Rising’. Even when historical re-evaluation with the introduction of revisionism in the history of the Irish nationalistic movement has become available, MacNeill was not saved from biased and slanted views. As a result, his share in changing the direction of Irish nationalistic movements has not been fully identified, leaving the analysis of his nationalistic creed still at a superficial level. Contrary to previous accounts, MacNeill endeavored to unify Irish people into ‘one Ireland’ and restore public dominance in the Home Rule movement. Such attitude of MacNeill was based on the social context of Ireland of the day. Ireland in the 1890s was under serious national division. The death of Charles Parnell, the national leader who embraced both Catholics and Protestants, intensified religious conflict. Religious and regional feud also upsurged as the people of Ulster strongly objected to the implementation of the Home Rule Bill. In addition, unlike Parnell who mobilized the Irish public for the nationalistic movement, Redmond, the following leader of the Irish Parliamentary Party, never trusted the common people. His stubborn trust on the legislation of the Home Rule Bill alienated the Irish public from the nationalistic movement under his leadership. This research analyzes MacNeill’s nationalistic movement in both cultural and militaristic facets and argues that his position and attitude towards the movement was consistent. First, in terms of his cultural contribution, his activity in the Gaelic League will be reviewed. This approach will reveal that he used Irish language to consolidate Irish national identity and attract the common people to participate in the nationalistic movement. Second, his activity in the Irish Volunteers will be examined to explain his militaristic contribution. This will demonstrate his leadership among the Irish public and his role in promoting their active participation in nationalistic movements against England. Despite his ardent effort, MacNeill’s activities were not always successful. The Gaelic League which started as a non-party, nonreligious association developed into a political association in 1913, excluding the moderate nationalists. In addition, the Irish Volunteers changed its position from defensive militarism to offensive militarism when the Easter Rising broke out in spite of MacNeill’s opposition. As a result of the Rising, Ulster was separated from the rest of Ireland forever and the reconciliation of Catholics and Protestants became an impossible dream. Nevertheless, MacNeill did succeed in placing the Irish public back into the center of the nationalistic movements. The Irish public who devolved the nationalistic initiative upon Irish Parliamentary Party after the death of Parnell decided to reclaim their role as the leader of the nationalistic movement. This change became an impetus which led the nationalistic movements of Ireland in the 1920s. MacNeill’s contribution to the Irish nationalist movement bore fruit when young nationalists such as Michael Collins and Eamon de Valera actively participated in the Anglo-Irish War. They were the ones who established Irish identity in the Gaelic League and learned military drills from the Irish Volunteers. They won the war and the heritage of MacNeill remained. (Seoul National University / jkjang@snu.ac.kr)
      번역하기

      This research is an effort to examine Eoin MacNeill’s nationalistic creed by focusing on his role and influence in the Irish Nationalist Movement in fin-de-siecle Ireland. MacNeill was a leading nationalist of the day who actively took part in both ...

      This research is an effort to examine Eoin MacNeill’s nationalistic creed by focusing on his role and influence in the Irish Nationalist Movement in fin-de-siecle Ireland. MacNeill was a leading nationalist of the day who actively took part in both cultural and militaristic movements. His contribution in constructing and developing the Gaelic League and the Irish Volunteers, both essential organizations of the movement, was part of his effort to deal with the division of Ireland and indifference of Irish public to nationalist movement. However, despite such leading role in promoting Irish Nationalism, his importance has been underestimated by many Irish historians. In most cases he has been portrayed as an ‘indecisive leader’ or ‘one who was responsible for the failure of the Easter Rising’. Even when historical re-evaluation with the introduction of revisionism in the history of the Irish nationalistic movement has become available, MacNeill was not saved from biased and slanted views. As a result, his share in changing the direction of Irish nationalistic movements has not been fully identified, leaving the analysis of his nationalistic creed still at a superficial level. Contrary to previous accounts, MacNeill endeavored to unify Irish people into ‘one Ireland’ and restore public dominance in the Home Rule movement. Such attitude of MacNeill was based on the social context of Ireland of the day. Ireland in the 1890s was under serious national division. The death of Charles Parnell, the national leader who embraced both Catholics and Protestants, intensified religious conflict. Religious and regional feud also upsurged as the people of Ulster strongly objected to the implementation of the Home Rule Bill. In addition, unlike Parnell who mobilized the Irish public for the nationalistic movement, Redmond, the following leader of the Irish Parliamentary Party, never trusted the common people. His stubborn trust on the legislation of the Home Rule Bill alienated the Irish public from the nationalistic movement under his leadership. This research analyzes MacNeill’s nationalistic movement in both cultural and militaristic facets and argues that his position and attitude towards the movement was consistent. First, in terms of his cultural contribution, his activity in the Gaelic League will be reviewed. This approach will reveal that he used Irish language to consolidate Irish national identity and attract the common people to participate in the nationalistic movement. Second, his activity in the Irish Volunteers will be examined to explain his militaristic contribution. This will demonstrate his leadership among the Irish public and his role in promoting their active participation in nationalistic movements against England. Despite his ardent effort, MacNeill’s activities were not always successful. The Gaelic League which started as a non-party, nonreligious association developed into a political association in 1913, excluding the moderate nationalists. In addition, the Irish Volunteers changed its position from defensive militarism to offensive militarism when the Easter Rising broke out in spite of MacNeill’s opposition. As a result of the Rising, Ulster was separated from the rest of Ireland forever and the reconciliation of Catholics and Protestants became an impossible dream. Nevertheless, MacNeill did succeed in placing the Irish public back into the center of the nationalistic movements. The Irish public who devolved the nationalistic initiative upon Irish Parliamentary Party after the death of Parnell decided to reclaim their role as the leader of the nationalistic movement. This change became an impetus which led the nationalistic movements of Ireland in the 1920s. MacNeill’s contribution to the Irish nationalist movement bore fruit when young nationalists such as Michael Collins and Eamon de Valera actively participated in the Anglo-Irish War. They were the ones who established Irish identity in the Gaelic League and learned military drills from the Irish Volunteers. They won the war and the heritage of MacNeill remained. (Seoul National University / jkjang@snu.ac.kr)

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박지향, "클래식 영국사" 김영사 [파주] 2012

      2 Theo W. Moody, "아일랜드의 역사: 도전과 투쟁, 부활과 희망의 대서사시" 한울 324-, 2009

      3 박지향, "아일랜드 역사서술: 민족주의와 수정주의를 넘어서" (50) : 251-279, 2000

      4 박지향, "슬픈 아일랜드" 기파랑 2008

      5 김기순, "글래드스턴과 아일랜드: 자치법안정치사 연구" 한림대학교 출판부 2009

      6 박지향, "게일연맹과 언어 민족주의" 한국서양사학회 (84) : 109-142, 2005

      7 Timothy McMahon, "“All Creeds and All Classes”? Just Who Made Up the Gaelic League?" 34 (34): 118-168, 2002

      8 Eoin MacNeill, "Why and How the Irish Language Is to Be Preserved" 1891

      9 Tony Crowley, "War of Words: The Politics of Language in Ireland, 1537-2004" Oxford University Press 145-, 2005

      10 Eoin MacNeill, "The Ulster Difficulty" 5-, 1920

      1 박지향, "클래식 영국사" 김영사 [파주] 2012

      2 Theo W. Moody, "아일랜드의 역사: 도전과 투쟁, 부활과 희망의 대서사시" 한울 324-, 2009

      3 박지향, "아일랜드 역사서술: 민족주의와 수정주의를 넘어서" (50) : 251-279, 2000

      4 박지향, "슬픈 아일랜드" 기파랑 2008

      5 김기순, "글래드스턴과 아일랜드: 자치법안정치사 연구" 한림대학교 출판부 2009

      6 박지향, "게일연맹과 언어 민족주의" 한국서양사학회 (84) : 109-142, 2005

      7 Timothy McMahon, "“All Creeds and All Classes”? Just Who Made Up the Gaelic League?" 34 (34): 118-168, 2002

      8 Eoin MacNeill, "Why and How the Irish Language Is to Be Preserved" 1891

      9 Tony Crowley, "War of Words: The Politics of Language in Ireland, 1537-2004" Oxford University Press 145-, 2005

      10 Eoin MacNeill, "The Ulster Difficulty" 5-, 1920

      11 F. X. Martin, "The Scholar Revolutionary: Eoin MacNeill, 1867-1945, and the Making of the New Ireland" Irish University Press 1973

      12 Fearghal McGarry, "The Rising" Oxford University Press 2010

      13 Moran, "The Philosophy of Irish Ireland"

      14 Eoin MacNeill, "The North Begins"

      15 Kevin B. Nowlan, "The Making of 1916: Studies in the History of the Rising" Stationery Office 1969

      16 Patrick Pearse, "The Irish Volunteers, 1913-1915: Recollections and Documents" J. Duffy 1963

      17 F. X. Martin, "The Irish Volunteers, 1913-1915: Recollections and Documents" J. Duffy 1963

      18 Diarmuid Lynch, "The I.R.B. and the 1916 Insurrection: a Record of the Preparations for the Rising, with Comments on Published Works Relating thereto, and a Report on Operations in the G.P.O. Garrison Area during Easter Week, 1916" Mercier Press 1957

      19 John Hutchinson, "The Dynamics of Cultural Nationalism : The Gaelic Revival and the Creation of the Irish Nation State" Allen&Urwin 2008

      20 Padraic Pearse, "The Coming Revolution: the Political Writings and Speeches of Patrick Pearse" Mercier Press 99-,

      21 Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland, "The Celtic Society, or Irish Historical and Literary Association" 1 (1): 1-12, 1850

      22 "Sunday Independent, 23 April 1916"

      23 P. J. Matthews, "Revival: The Abbey Theatre, Sinn Fein, the Gaelic League and the Co-operative Movement" Cork University Press 2003

      24 Eoin MacNeill, "Phases of Irish History" Gill & Son 9-, 1919

      25 Elaine Sisson, "Pearse's Patriots: St Enda's and the Cult of Boyhood" Cork University Press 80-, 2004

      26 "Parliamentary Papers, 18 October 1916, Vol. 86"

      27 Michael Wheatley, "Nationalism and the Irish Party: Provincial Ireland, 1910-1916" Oxford University Press 2008

      28 R. F. Foster, "Modern Ireland, 1600-1972" Penguin Books 473-, 1989

      29 Brigittine M. French, "Linguistic Science and Nationalist Revolution: Expert Knowledge and the Making of Sameness in Pre-Independent Ireland" 38 (38): 610-, 2009

      30 Ríona Nic Congáil, "Life and the Dream: Utopian Impulses Within the Irish Language Revival" 23 (23): 432-, 2012

      31 F. X. Martin, "Leaders and Men of the Easter Rising: Dublin 1916" Cornell University Press 26-137, 1967

      32 A. C. Hepburn, "Language, Religion and National Identity in Ireland since 1880" 2 (2): 197-220, 2001

      33 Padraig O Riagain, "Language Policy and Social Reproduction: Ireland 1893-1993" Clarendon Press 5-,

      34 Eoin MacNeill, "Irish in the National University of Ireland: A Plea for Irish Education" An Cló-Cumann Ltd 1908

      35 Oliver MacDonagh, "Irish Culture and Nationalism 1750-1950" Macmillan in association with Humanities Research Centre, Australian National University 2001

      36 Paul Bew, "Ireland: the Politics of Enmity 1789-2006" Oxford University Press 2007

      37 Bulmer Hobson, "Ireland Yesterday and Tomorrow" Anvil Books 42-58, 1968

      38 Timothy G. MacMahon, "Grand Opportunity:The Gaelic Revival and Irish Society, 1893-1910" Syracuse University Press 2008

      39 Timothy McMahon, "Grand Opportunity: the Gaelic Revival and Irish Society, 1893-1910" Syracuse University Press 94-130, 2008

      40 John Ryan, "Féil-sgríbhinn Eóin Mhic Néill: Essays and Studies Presented to Professor Eoin MacNeill on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday, May 15th 1938" Three Candles 556-, 1940

      41 Michael Tierney, "Eoin MacNeill: Scholar and Man of Action, 1867-1945" Oxford University Press 1981

      42 F. X. Martin, "Eoin MacNeill on the 1916 Rising" 12 (12): 226-271, 1961

      43 Charles Townshend, "Easter 1916: The Irish Rebellion" Ivan R. Dee 38-71, 2006

      44 Janet Dunleavy, "Douglas Hyde: A Maker of Modern Ireland" University of California Press 236-, 1991

      45 Richard English, "Directions in Historiography: History and Irish Nationalism" 37 (37): 447-460, 2011

      46 Padraic Pearse, "Collected Works of Pádraic H. Pearse: Political Writings and Speeches" Maunsel & Roberts Ltd 8-, 1922

      47 W. B. Yeats, "Autobiographies" Macmillan 554-, 1956

      48 Eoin MacNeill, "A Plea and A Plan" 1893

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2018-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.2 0.2 0.23
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.19 0.2 0.681 0.18
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼