RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      유럽연합의 세계 대학 평가시스템 ‘유-멀티랭크’ 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103524542

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study was to highlight the necessity of a conceptual reestablishment of world university evaluations. The hitherto most wellknown and validated world university evaluation systems such as Times Higher Education (THE), Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) or Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) primarily assess big universities with quantitative evaluation indicators and performance results in the rankings. Those Systems have instigated a kind of elitism in higher education and neglect numerous small or local institutions of higher education, instead of providing stakeholders with comprehensive information about the real possibilities of tertiary education so that they can choose an institution that is individually tailored to their needs. Also, the management boards of universities and policymakers in higher education have partly been manipulated by and partly taken advantage of the elitist ranking systems with an economic emphasis, as indicated by research-centered evaluations and industry-university cooperation. To supplement such educational defects and to redress the lack of world university evaluation systems, a new system called ‘U-Multirank’ has been implemented with the financial support of the European Commission since 2012. U-Multirank was designed and is enforced by an international team of project experts led by CHE(Centre for Higher Education/Germany), CHEPS(Center for Higher Education Policy Studies/Netherlands) and CWTS(Centre for Science and Technology Studies at Leiden University/ Netherlands). The significant features of U-Multirank, compared with e.g., THE and ARWU, are its qualitative, multidimensional, user-oriented and individualized assessment methods. Above all, its website and its assessment results, based on a mobile operating system and designed simply for international users, present a self-organized and evolutionary model of world university evaluation systems in the digital and global era. To estimate the universal validity of the redefinition of the world university evaluation system using U-Multirank, an epistemological approach will be used that relies on Edgar Morin’s Complexity Theory and Karl Popper’s Philosophy of Science.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to highlight the necessity of a conceptual reestablishment of world university evaluations. The hitherto most wellknown and validated world university evaluation systems such as Times Higher Education (THE), Quacquarelli ...

      The purpose of this study was to highlight the necessity of a conceptual reestablishment of world university evaluations. The hitherto most wellknown and validated world university evaluation systems such as Times Higher Education (THE), Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) or Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) primarily assess big universities with quantitative evaluation indicators and performance results in the rankings. Those Systems have instigated a kind of elitism in higher education and neglect numerous small or local institutions of higher education, instead of providing stakeholders with comprehensive information about the real possibilities of tertiary education so that they can choose an institution that is individually tailored to their needs. Also, the management boards of universities and policymakers in higher education have partly been manipulated by and partly taken advantage of the elitist ranking systems with an economic emphasis, as indicated by research-centered evaluations and industry-university cooperation. To supplement such educational defects and to redress the lack of world university evaluation systems, a new system called ‘U-Multirank’ has been implemented with the financial support of the European Commission since 2012. U-Multirank was designed and is enforced by an international team of project experts led by CHE(Centre for Higher Education/Germany), CHEPS(Center for Higher Education Policy Studies/Netherlands) and CWTS(Centre for Science and Technology Studies at Leiden University/ Netherlands). The significant features of U-Multirank, compared with e.g., THE and ARWU, are its qualitative, multidimensional, user-oriented and individualized assessment methods. Above all, its website and its assessment results, based on a mobile operating system and designed simply for international users, present a self-organized and evolutionary model of world university evaluation systems in the digital and global era. To estimate the universal validity of the redefinition of the world university evaluation system using U-Multirank, an epistemological approach will be used that relies on Edgar Morin’s Complexity Theory and Karl Popper’s Philosophy of Science.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Popper, K. R., "추측과 논박 1 [Conjectures and Refutations]" 민음사 1963

      2 남궁근, "유럽연합의 대학개혁" 法文社 2014

      3 유완, "아시아대학 순위 평가(THEAUR)에 영향을 미치는 평가준거 및 주요국 비교 분석" 한국비교교육학회 25 (25): 145-167, 2015

      4 이호섭, "세계 대학 평가 순위 변동에 대한 비교분석-The World University Rankings에 대한 잠재 성장모형 적용 종단분석을 중심으로-" 한국비교교육학회 24 (24): 111-129, 2014

      5 김훈호, "세계 대학 순위평가의 문제점에 대한 실증적 연구" 한국교육행정학회 28 (28): 301-326, 2010

      6 Morin, E., "복잡성 사고 입문〔Introduction à La Pensée Complexe〕" 에코리브르 2005

      7 "동아일보 2013년 5월 28일자 기사"

      8 Popper, K. R., "과학적 발견의 논리 [The Logic of Scientific Discovery]" 고려원 1959

      9 Popper, K. R., "객관적 지식: 진화론적 접근 [Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach]" 철학과현실사 1972

      10 "https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/world-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/locations/KR/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats"

      1 Popper, K. R., "추측과 논박 1 [Conjectures and Refutations]" 민음사 1963

      2 남궁근, "유럽연합의 대학개혁" 法文社 2014

      3 유완, "아시아대학 순위 평가(THEAUR)에 영향을 미치는 평가준거 및 주요국 비교 분석" 한국비교교육학회 25 (25): 145-167, 2015

      4 이호섭, "세계 대학 평가 순위 변동에 대한 비교분석-The World University Rankings에 대한 잠재 성장모형 적용 종단분석을 중심으로-" 한국비교교육학회 24 (24): 111-129, 2014

      5 김훈호, "세계 대학 순위평가의 문제점에 대한 실증적 연구" 한국교육행정학회 28 (28): 301-326, 2010

      6 Morin, E., "복잡성 사고 입문〔Introduction à La Pensée Complexe〕" 에코리브르 2005

      7 "동아일보 2013년 5월 28일자 기사"

      8 Popper, K. R., "과학적 발견의 논리 [The Logic of Scientific Discovery]" 고려원 1959

      9 Popper, K. R., "객관적 지식: 진화론적 접근 [Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach]" 철학과현실사 1972

      10 "https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/world-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/locations/KR/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats"

      11 "http://www.topuniversities.com"

      12 "http://www.shanghairanking.com/ko/ARWU-Statistics-2009.html"

      13 "http://www.shanghairanking.com/index.html"

      14 Usher, A, "University Rankings, Diversity, and the New Landscape of Higher Education" Sense Publishers 2009

      15 Federkeil, G., "University Rankings, Diversity, and the New Landscape of Higher Education" Sense Publishers 2009

      16 CHE, "U-Multirank: Implementierung eines nutzer-orientierten, multidimensionalen internationalen Hochschulrankings" Amt für Veröffentlichungen der Europäischen Union 2015

      17 "ScienceTimes 2013년 2월 19일자 기사"

      18 van Vught, F., "Reform of Higher Education in Europe" Sense Publishers 2011

      19 Beerkens, M, "Reform of Higher Education in Europe" Sense Publishers 2011

      20 van Vught, F, "Multidimensional Ranking. The Design and Development of U-Multirank" Springer 2012

      21 "European Commission–Announcement 2016년 4월 4일자 기사"

      22 "European Commission - Daily News 2017년 3월 30일자 기사"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.79 0.79 0.98
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.91 0.94 1.28 0.26
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼