日本における改憲の動向 : 政黨ㆍ憲法調査會ㆍ經濟界ㆍ知識人 Party, Committee of the Constitution, Financial Circles, and Intellectuals = The Direction of Constitutional Amendment in Japan

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Ⅰ. Introduction: The Landscape of Constitutional Amendment in Japan
＊Confusions about “What is Constitution”
＊One Sided “Realism” about Relations Between Norms and Realities
＊“Challenge of Exception” to Laws and Norms is Ongoing Under the Name of “Constitutional Amendment”
Ⅱ. Attitudes of Japanese Parties Concerning Constitutional Amendment
1．Liberal Democratic Party’s Arguments about “Constitutional Amendment”: “The Outline of emocratic Party’s Tentative” (April, 4, 2005)
ａ）“Dignitary State”?
ｂ）Families and Communities Which Constitutes “Public”
ｃ）From Self Defensive Forces to “The Army”
ｄ）“New Human Rights” and New Obligations
ｅ）Policy Making and Executive Proceeding Given Priority to the Celerity
ｆ）Conversion of the Obligation to Respect and Uphold the Constitution: Do People Abide by the Constitution?
2．Democratic Party’s Argument about “Constitutional Enactment”: The Loss of the Checking Function of the Opposition Party?
ａ）Action of Democratic Party’s Commission of the Constitution
ｂ）Contents and Characteristics of Democratic Party’s “Progress Report”
3. Komei Party’s Argument about “Constitutional Addition”: From “Plus Amendment” * Professor of Waseda University to Swaying “Preserve Article 9”
ａ）Contents and Characteristics of Komei Party’s “Document of Point of Argument”
ｂ）The Turnabout in Article 9
4. Conclusion of this Section: The Prospect of the Argument About Constitutional Amendment
Ⅲ. Arguments of the Committee of the Constitution in the Diet
1. What is the Committee of the Constitution
2. The Aim of the Committee to Amend the Constitution
3. The Background and the Goal of Constitutional Amendment
4. “The Frame of the State” of Japan Designed by Constitutional Amendment
5. The Landscape of the Committee
6. Conclusion of this Section
Ⅳ. The Characteristics of the Argument about Constitutional Amendment by the Financial Circles
1. Owing to Unmanly Politics, Financial Circles Become “The Playmaker” of Constitutional mendment
2. The Extraordinary Board of Inquiry for 21st Century’s Argument about Constitutional Amendment
3. Japan Association of Corporate Executives’ Argument about Constitutional Amendment
4. Positioning and Evaluation of Financial Circles’ Argument
＊The Reason Why Financial Circles Propose to Amend the Constitution
＊The Globalization of Economics and Constitutional Amendment
＊The Way to the New Society of Inequality
Ⅴ. Intellectuals’ “Argument about Article 9”
1. “Preserving the Constitution Argument about Constitutional Amendment”: “The International Public Action for the Security”?
2. “Moderate Pacifism”: A Contradiction Between Constitutionalism and Pacifism?
3. The New “Non Militant Argument”: “Continuing Protection and Not Attack” Conclusion: The Japan South Korea Relationship and the Problems of Constitutional Amendment
＊Can Article 9 Still Have the Meaning?
＊The Present Situation and Task of Japan South Korea Relationship
＊To Aim “Future Oriented” Solution

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. はじめに――憲法改正をめぐる日本の風景(Ⅰ. 머리말 - 헌법개정을 둘러싼 일본의 풍경)
• Ⅱ. 日本の政黨の憲法改正に對する態度(Ⅱ. 일본 정당의 헌법개정에 대한 태도)
• Ⅲ. 國會の憲法調査會における改憲論議(Ⅲ. 국회 헌법조사회의 개헌논의)
• Ⅳ. 經濟界の改憲論の特徵(Ⅳ. 경제계의 개헌론의 특징)
• Ⅴ. 知識人の「９條論」(Ⅴ. 지식인의 「제9조론」)
• Ⅵ. むすびにかえて――日韓關係と改憲問題(Ⅵ. 맺음말에 대신하여 - 한일관계와 개헌문제)
• 국문 번역문