RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    AI 시대의 협력 번역(collaborative translation): 연구 동향과 개념적 확장 = Rethinking Collaborative Translation in the AI Era: Research Trends and Conceptual Expansion

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109737820

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examines how collaborative translation has been approached in Korean scholarship and explores its conceptual framework and potential for development. Unlike in international research, where the term is more clearly defined, collaborative translation remains underused and insufficiently theorized in Korea. To address this gap, the study analyzes 254 academic papers to identify prevailing trends and limitations. Findings show that machine-centered approaches dominate (61.4%), focusing mainly on MT evaluation and translation education, while studies on professional collaboration between human translators and MT systems are relatively scarce. Human-centered studies (38%) encompass both multi-translator models—such as online collaboration, relay translation, and co-translation—and single-translator models involving collaboration with editors, proofreaders, clients, and others. Despite the widespread practice of co-translation, it remains underexplored in academic literature, exposing a gap between industry and academia. Existing classification models also fail to account for cases where a single translator assumes multiple roles, underscoring the need for a more nuanced framework that considers the intensity, stages, and dynamics of collaboration. This study highlights the need for a clearer and more comprehensive conceptualization of collaborative translation, and calls for future research that bridges theoretical insights with evolving technological and professional practices.
    번역하기

    This study examines how collaborative translation has been approached in Korean scholarship and explores its conceptual framework and potential for development. Unlike in international research, where the term is more clearly defined, collaborative tr...

    This study examines how collaborative translation has been approached in Korean scholarship and explores its conceptual framework and potential for development. Unlike in international research, where the term is more clearly defined, collaborative translation remains underused and insufficiently theorized in Korea. To address this gap, the study analyzes 254 academic papers to identify prevailing trends and limitations. Findings show that machine-centered approaches dominate (61.4%), focusing mainly on MT evaluation and translation education, while studies on professional collaboration between human translators and MT systems are relatively scarce. Human-centered studies (38%) encompass both multi-translator models—such as online collaboration, relay translation, and co-translation—and single-translator models involving collaboration with editors, proofreaders, clients, and others. Despite the widespread practice of co-translation, it remains underexplored in academic literature, exposing a gap between industry and academia. Existing classification models also fail to account for cases where a single translator assumes multiple roles, underscoring the need for a more nuanced framework that considers the intensity, stages, and dynamics of collaboration. This study highlights the need for a clearer and more comprehensive conceptualization of collaborative translation, and calls for future research that bridges theoretical insights with evolving technological and professional practices.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼