RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Product Strategy of Korean Exporters in China

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104782906

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      There are only a handful of studies dealing with the issue of product strategy in international markets. In particular, the understanding of this issue for firms from non-Triad markets, for instance, firms from emerging markets (EMFs), is rather limited. The objective of this study is to provide an initial exploratory research on product strategy for Korean firms in Chinese market, and attempts to extend current product strategy research into emerging contexts. In this study, three viable product strategies for Korean firms - economy, superior-value and premium, are defined. Using survey data collected from 131 exporters, we first examine the nature of product strategy adopted by Korean exporters in China, and then investigate their performance implications. Findings reveal that superior-value strategy is the most frequently employed strategy by Korean firms, and firms choosing more value-added strategies, such as premium or superior-value, on average, demonstrate superior performance. This study will dictate important guidelines for Korean firms to target international markets and to better understand the importance of product strategy choice in this process.
      번역하기

      There are only a handful of studies dealing with the issue of product strategy in international markets. In particular, the understanding of this issue for firms from non-Triad markets, for instance, firms from emerging markets (EMFs), is rather limit...

      There are only a handful of studies dealing with the issue of product strategy in international markets. In particular, the understanding of this issue for firms from non-Triad markets, for instance, firms from emerging markets (EMFs), is rather limited. The objective of this study is to provide an initial exploratory research on product strategy for Korean firms in Chinese market, and attempts to extend current product strategy research into emerging contexts. In this study, three viable product strategies for Korean firms - economy, superior-value and premium, are defined. Using survey data collected from 131 exporters, we first examine the nature of product strategy adopted by Korean exporters in China, and then investigate their performance implications. Findings reveal that superior-value strategy is the most frequently employed strategy by Korean firms, and firms choosing more value-added strategies, such as premium or superior-value, on average, demonstrate superior performance. This study will dictate important guidelines for Korean firms to target international markets and to better understand the importance of product strategy choice in this process.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Brouthers, L. E., "The Influence of Triad Nations’ Environments on Product-quality Product Strategies and MNC Performance" 31 (31): 39-62, 2000

      2 Levitt,T, "The Globalization of Markets" 61 (61): 92-102, 1983

      3 Porter,M.E, "The Competitive Advantage of Nations" 68 (68): 73-93, 1990

      4 Jain,S.C, "Standardization of International Marketing Strategy:Some Research Hypotheses" 53 (53): 70-79, 1989

      5 Brouthers, L. E, "Product Stereotypes,Strategy and Performance Satisfaction:The Case of Chinese Exporters" 33 (33): 657-677, 2002

      6 Singh,J.V, "Performance,Slack and Risk-taking in Organizational Decision-making" 29 (29): 562-585, 1986

      7 Cavusgil, S. T, "Marketing Strategy-performance Relationship:An Investigation of the Empirical Link in Export Market Ventures" 58 (58): 1-21, 1994

      8 O’Donnell, S, "Marketing Standardization Within Global Industries:An Empirical Study of Performance Implications" 17 (17): 19-33, 2000

      9 Day,G.S, "Market Driven Strategy" Free Press 1990

      10 Chung,H.F.L, "International Standardization Strategies:The Experiences of Australian and New Zealand Firms Operating in The Greater China Markets" 11 (11): 48-62, 2003

      1 Brouthers, L. E., "The Influence of Triad Nations’ Environments on Product-quality Product Strategies and MNC Performance" 31 (31): 39-62, 2000

      2 Levitt,T, "The Globalization of Markets" 61 (61): 92-102, 1983

      3 Porter,M.E, "The Competitive Advantage of Nations" 68 (68): 73-93, 1990

      4 Jain,S.C, "Standardization of International Marketing Strategy:Some Research Hypotheses" 53 (53): 70-79, 1989

      5 Brouthers, L. E, "Product Stereotypes,Strategy and Performance Satisfaction:The Case of Chinese Exporters" 33 (33): 657-677, 2002

      6 Singh,J.V, "Performance,Slack and Risk-taking in Organizational Decision-making" 29 (29): 562-585, 1986

      7 Cavusgil, S. T, "Marketing Strategy-performance Relationship:An Investigation of the Empirical Link in Export Market Ventures" 58 (58): 1-21, 1994

      8 O’Donnell, S, "Marketing Standardization Within Global Industries:An Empirical Study of Performance Implications" 17 (17): 19-33, 2000

      9 Day,G.S, "Market Driven Strategy" Free Press 1990

      10 Chung,H.F.L, "International Standardization Strategies:The Experiences of Australian and New Zealand Firms Operating in The Greater China Markets" 11 (11): 48-62, 2003

      11 Cateora,P, "International Marketing" Irwin 1993

      12 Wild, J. J., "International Business: An Integrated Approach" Prentice Hall 2000

      13 Douglas, S. P., "Integrating Branding Strategy Across Markets: Building International Brand Architecture" 9 (9): 97-114, 2001

      14 Ashley,S.R, "How to Effectively Compete Against Private-label Brands" 38 (38): 75-82, 1998

      15 Luo,Y, "How Important are Shared Perceptions of Procedural Justice in Cooperative Alliances?" 48 (48): 695-709, 2005

      16 Wright, M., "Guest editor’s Introduction:Strategy Research in Emerging Economies:Challenging the Conventional Wisdom" 42 (42): 1-33, 2005

      17 Zou, S, "Global Strategy:An Review and an Integrated Conceptual Framework" 30 (30): 52-69, 1996

      18 Brouthers, L. E., "Generic Product Strategies for Emerging Market Exports into Triad Nation Markets:A Mimetic Isomorphism Approach" 42 (42): 226-245, 2005

      19 Brouthers, L. E, "Explaining National Competitive Advantage for a Small European Country:A Test of Three Competing Models" 6 (6): 53-70, 1997

      20 Armstrong, J. S, "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys" 14 (14): 396-402, 1977

      21 Venkatraman, N, "Environment-strategy Coalignment:Its Performance Implications" 11 (11): 1-23, 1990

      22 Roth,M.S, "Effect of Global Market Conditions on Brand Image Customization and Brand Performance" 24 (24): 55-75, 1995

      23 Porter,M.E, "Competition in Global Industries" Harvard Business School Press 1986

      24 Hussain, A, "Changes in China’s Industrial Landscape and Their Implications" 29 (29): 5-20, 1999

      25 Gao, P., "Can Chinese brands make It a Broad?" 4 : 54-65, 2003

      26 Fang, E, "Antecedents and Consequences of Marketing Dynamic Capabilities in International Joint Ventures" 40 (40): 742-761, 2009

      27 Gomes, L, "An Empirical Examination of the Form of Relationship Between Multinationality and Performance" 30 (30): 173-188, 1999

      28 Jeong,I, "A Cross-national Study of the Relationship between International Diversification and New Product Performance" 20 (20): 353-376, 2003

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.37 1.37 1.37
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.37 1.39 1.62 0.33
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼