RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    사법권력의 증대와 통제

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101736983

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    As the authority and the role of the judicial power have increased all over the world, the judicial power in the democratic country has been playing very important roles as the right guardian or the conflict resolver, but also the policy decision-maker. In South Korea as well, the judicial power is being magnified as a significant performer over its authority and role have enlarged after the democratization in 1987. These changes are creating new tasks for how we check the judicial power. The recent active discussions for the ensuring accountability of the judicial power and the actual efforts by many countries to provide institutional politics for the judicial power control can be seen all as correspondence for the increasing authority of the judicial power. This is full of suggestions to Korean situations with a high public distrust about the jurisdiction by continued the judicial bureaucracy system. Therefore, this study theoretically determined that the judicial power in the modern democracy is a subject to appropriate control, same as the legislative and administrative powers, and tried categorizing of control. It firstly looked the development possibility of the modern democracy when the stable operation of constitutionalism is a prerequisite of it with the relationship between them as a central figure, then it analyzed the phenomenon of escalating the role and authority of the judicial power in democracy. As a response, moreover, this paper investigated cases for the introduction and reinforcement of the institutional strategies to spread awareness for the need of the judicial power control and to control the judicial power. Based on these, it classified the type of control for the judicial power in order to contribute to the system reformation discussion for the proper control system arrangement of the judicial power.
    번역하기

    As the authority and the role of the judicial power have increased all over the world, the judicial power in the democratic country has been playing very important roles as the right guardian or the conflict resolver, but also the policy decision-make...

    As the authority and the role of the judicial power have increased all over the world, the judicial power in the democratic country has been playing very important roles as the right guardian or the conflict resolver, but also the policy decision-maker. In South Korea as well, the judicial power is being magnified as a significant performer over its authority and role have enlarged after the democratization in 1987. These changes are creating new tasks for how we check the judicial power. The recent active discussions for the ensuring accountability of the judicial power and the actual efforts by many countries to provide institutional politics for the judicial power control can be seen all as correspondence for the increasing authority of the judicial power. This is full of suggestions to Korean situations with a high public distrust about the jurisdiction by continued the judicial bureaucracy system. Therefore, this study theoretically determined that the judicial power in the modern democracy is a subject to appropriate control, same as the legislative and administrative powers, and tried categorizing of control. It firstly looked the development possibility of the modern democracy when the stable operation of constitutionalism is a prerequisite of it with the relationship between them as a central figure, then it analyzed the phenomenon of escalating the role and authority of the judicial power in democracy. As a response, moreover, this paper investigated cases for the introduction and reinforcement of the institutional strategies to spread awareness for the need of the judicial power control and to control the judicial power. Based on these, it classified the type of control for the judicial power in order to contribute to the system reformation discussion for the proper control system arrangement of the judicial power.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼