RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      建筑作品的范围争议与辨析 = Dispute and Discriminate on Scope of Architectural Works

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106892265

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      With the architectural works become the type of works protected by copyright law in China, theoretical and judicial circles began to pay attention to the copyright protection of architectural works. It is of great significance to define the scope of architectural works, It is not only related to the judgment of architectural works, but also related to the judgment of the content of copyright rights of architectural works, and then related to the judgment of the copyright infringement of architectural works, and finally related to the protection of the copyright of architectural works. The theoretical and judicial circles in China have disputes over the definition of the scope of architectural works. There are different understandings and formed different views. However, different understandings and different viewpoints have brought difficulties to the copyright protection of architectural works, leading to the differences in the copyright protection of architectural works in judicial practice. This paper aims at sorting out the disputes and different viewpoints and discriminating them, so as to settle the relevant disputes and unify the viewpoints, so as to promote the unification of the copyright protection of architectural works.
      번역하기

      With the architectural works become the type of works protected by copyright law in China, theoretical and judicial circles began to pay attention to the copyright protection of architectural works. It is of great significance to define the scope of a...

      With the architectural works become the type of works protected by copyright law in China, theoretical and judicial circles began to pay attention to the copyright protection of architectural works. It is of great significance to define the scope of architectural works, It is not only related to the judgment of architectural works, but also related to the judgment of the content of copyright rights of architectural works, and then related to the judgment of the copyright infringement of architectural works, and finally related to the protection of the copyright of architectural works. The theoretical and judicial circles in China have disputes over the definition of the scope of architectural works. There are different understandings and formed different views. However, different understandings and different viewpoints have brought difficulties to the copyright protection of architectural works, leading to the differences in the copyright protection of architectural works in judicial practice. This paper aims at sorting out the disputes and different viewpoints and discriminating them, so as to settle the relevant disputes and unify the viewpoints, so as to promote the unification of the copyright protection of architectural works.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      随着我国《著作权法》将建筑作品明确为保护的作品类型后,理论界 和司法界开始关注建筑作品的著作权保护问题. 建筑作品范围的界定具有 重要意义,不仅关系到对建筑作品的判定,也关系到建筑作品著作权权 利内容的判定,进而也关系到侵犯建筑作品著作权行为的判定,并最终 关系到对建筑作品的著作权保护. 我国理论界以及司法界对建筑作品的范 围界定存在争议,有不同的理解并形成了不同的观点,而不同的理解和 不同的观点给建筑作品的著作权保护带来了困境,导致了司法实践中对 建筑作品著作权保护的差异. 本文旨在梳理争议和不同观点,并进行辨析, 以期对解决相关争议、统一观点,促进对建筑作品著作权保护的统一.
      번역하기

      随着我国《著作权法》将建筑作品明确为保护的作品类型后,理论界 和司法界开始关注建筑作品的著作权保护问题. 建筑作品范围的界定具有 重要意义,不仅关系到对建筑作品的判定,也关...

      随着我国《著作权法》将建筑作品明确为保护的作品类型后,理论界 和司法界开始关注建筑作品的著作权保护问题. 建筑作品范围的界定具有 重要意义,不仅关系到对建筑作品的判定,也关系到建筑作品著作权权 利内容的判定,进而也关系到侵犯建筑作品著作权行为的判定,并最终 关系到对建筑作品的著作权保护. 我国理论界以及司法界对建筑作品的范 围界定存在争议,有不同的理解并形成了不同的观点,而不同的理解和 不同的观点给建筑作品的著作权保护带来了困境,导致了司法实践中对 建筑作品著作权保护的差异. 本文旨在梳理争议和不同观点,并进行辨析, 以期对解决相关争议、统一观点,促进对建筑作品著作权保护的统一.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 费安玲, "载《十二国著作权法》" 清华大学出版社 2011

      2 王迁, "论著作权法保护工业设计图的界限——以英国<版权法>的变迁为视角" (1) : 2013

      3 王迁, "论建筑作品的表现形式" (6) : 2014

      4 胡琳琳, "论建筑作品的构成" (3) : 2010

      5 陈倩, "论与建筑有关的著作权问题" (2) : 2001

      6 吴汉东, "西方诸国著作权制度研究" 中国政法大学出版社 1998

      7 汤宗舜, "著作权法原理" 知识产权出版社 2005

      8 李明德, "著作权法" 法律出版社 2003

      9 "著作权法" 法律出版社 2004

      10 WIPO, "著作权与邻接权法律术语汇编(中英法对照)" 北京大学出版社 2007

      1 费安玲, "载《十二国著作权法》" 清华大学出版社 2011

      2 王迁, "论著作权法保护工业设计图的界限——以英国<版权法>的变迁为视角" (1) : 2013

      3 王迁, "论建筑作品的表现形式" (6) : 2014

      4 胡琳琳, "论建筑作品的构成" (3) : 2010

      5 陈倩, "论与建筑有关的著作权问题" (2) : 2001

      6 吴汉东, "西方诸国著作权制度研究" 中国政法大学出版社 1998

      7 汤宗舜, "著作权法原理" 知识产权出版社 2005

      8 李明德, "著作权法" 法律出版社 2003

      9 "著作权法" 法律出版社 2004

      10 WIPO, "著作权与邻接权法律术语汇编(中英法对照)" 北京大学出版社 2007

      11 郑成思, "版权法" 中国人民大学出版社 1997

      12 郑成思, "版权法" 中国人民法学出版社 2009

      13 袁博, "浅析建筑作品版权侵权判定规则"

      14 "法国《著作权法》L122-3条"

      15 参见, "日本著作权法" 国家版权局编

      16 尹志强, "建筑作品范围及复制侵权的认定" (1) : 2009

      17 刘瑛, "再论建筑作品的著作权保护-从‘盛放鸟巢’烟花侵权纠纷案谈起" (2) : 2012

      18 中外版权法规汇编编写组, "中外版权法规汇编" 北京师范大学出版社 1993

      19 "《美国版权法》第101条"

      20 吴明秀, "2009年中华全国律师协会知识产权专业委员会暨中国律师知识产权高层论文论文集(上)"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2017-06-01 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean-Chinese Society of Law -> The Korea-China Society of Law KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.14 0.14 0.1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.1 0.08 0.241 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼