RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국철학 : 조선 성리학자들의 사서 이해 및 해석에 있어 해석자의 자주성에 관한 연구 -퇴계와 율곡의 사례를 중심으로- = Korean Philosophy : A Study on Yi T`oegye and Yi Yulgok`s Self-Reliance in Understanding and Interpretation of the Four Books

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40124384

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Four Books had not been the texts of the Confucian canon till Chu Hsi compiled and published an edition of the Four Books. Since the Yu‥an dynasty adopted Chu Hsi’s version of the Four Books as the basis for the civil service examinations in 1313-1315, the Four Books with Chu Hsi’s Commentaries on them became the most influential works and had great authority over East Asian society. On this fact many people tend to presuppose that the meaning of the Four Books was determined by Chu Hsi, and that therefore the leading Chuhsians of the Korea Chosun dynasty submitted themselves to Chu Hsi`s reading of the Four Books, lacking their own reading and interpretation of them. T`oegye Yi Hwang(1501-1570) and Yulgok YI I(1536-1584) of the sixteenth century are two of the most prominent Confucian philosopher in development of Neo-Confucianism of Ch`eng-Chu school during the Chosun period. It is a common view that Korean Neo-Confucianism own understanding and interpretation of the Four Books began in the seventeenth century. In this article the author provides us with evidences to substantiate the claim that Yi T`oegye and Yi Yulgok took their own reading and interpretation of the Four Books based on their thoughts and understanding, not following blindly Chu Hsi`s reading and commentaries. The Four Books surpassed the Five Classics in exercising influence on the educated elite in the tradition of East Asia. In reading and interpretation of the Four Books, the author maintains, Yi T`oegye and Yi Yulgok were original in their own way, though they owed much to Chu Hsi, and some to the predecessors of China or Korea. And the author focuses on his contention that a Confucian is unable to stand on his own feet in understanding and interpretation of the Confucian Classics unless he has his own thoughts in Confucian metaphysics, that is to say, a Neo-Confucian`s own understanding and interpretation of the Four Books is never separated from the Neo-Confucian`s own metaphysical system.
    번역하기

    The Four Books had not been the texts of the Confucian canon till Chu Hsi compiled and published an edition of the Four Books. Since the Yu‥an dynasty adopted Chu Hsi’s version of the Four Books as the basis for the civil service examinations in 1...

    The Four Books had not been the texts of the Confucian canon till Chu Hsi compiled and published an edition of the Four Books. Since the Yu‥an dynasty adopted Chu Hsi’s version of the Four Books as the basis for the civil service examinations in 1313-1315, the Four Books with Chu Hsi’s Commentaries on them became the most influential works and had great authority over East Asian society. On this fact many people tend to presuppose that the meaning of the Four Books was determined by Chu Hsi, and that therefore the leading Chuhsians of the Korea Chosun dynasty submitted themselves to Chu Hsi`s reading of the Four Books, lacking their own reading and interpretation of them. T`oegye Yi Hwang(1501-1570) and Yulgok YI I(1536-1584) of the sixteenth century are two of the most prominent Confucian philosopher in development of Neo-Confucianism of Ch`eng-Chu school during the Chosun period. It is a common view that Korean Neo-Confucianism own understanding and interpretation of the Four Books began in the seventeenth century. In this article the author provides us with evidences to substantiate the claim that Yi T`oegye and Yi Yulgok took their own reading and interpretation of the Four Books based on their thoughts and understanding, not following blindly Chu Hsi`s reading and commentaries. The Four Books surpassed the Five Classics in exercising influence on the educated elite in the tradition of East Asia. In reading and interpretation of the Four Books, the author maintains, Yi T`oegye and Yi Yulgok were original in their own way, though they owed much to Chu Hsi, and some to the predecessors of China or Korea. And the author focuses on his contention that a Confucian is unable to stand on his own feet in understanding and interpretation of the Confucian Classics unless he has his own thoughts in Confucian metaphysics, that is to say, a Neo-Confucian`s own understanding and interpretation of the Four Books is never separated from the Neo-Confucian`s own metaphysical system.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-05-31 학술지명변경 한글명 : 동양철학연구(Journal of Eastern Philosophy) -> 동양철학연구
    외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Eastern Philosophy
    KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.54 0.54 0.59
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.55 0.54 1.394 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼