<세경본풀이>의 世界觀的 基底와 談論 構造 = A Word View Base and a Discourse Structure of <Se-kyung-bon-pul-i>

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

]The purpose of this study is to look into a creative way & descriptive principle of <Sekyungbonpuli>, on the assumption that there is a view of the World peculiar to a shamanistic myth, and to inquire into its mythological phase. The results of study can be summarized as follows:First, when focusing on a plot as a means of venting one's anger, it's found that there is an enormous distance between Jachungbi and Sekyungsin. Since an ordinary woman can not become <Sekyungsin>, a device is needed by which a positional status of God is given. A thing playing a role as the device is the very symmetrical view of the World.Second, there is two stratums in <Sekyungbonpuli>: one is a figure stratum appearing through Jachungbi; the other is an ideological stratum that the plot of the literary work presents.Third, a phase of a dialogue between the two stratums has been created while a figure stratum is trying to approach an ideological stratum and the ideological stratum is drawing a figure stratum at the same time. When considering the fact that in the descriptive studies, the phase of a dialogue being created between the two components is called as a discourse, it seems that the phase of a dialogue between the two stratum has taken on a strong character of a discourseFourth, the persons class(including the author and readers) of <Sekyungbonpuli> would like to bring out the world in which one turns over 'what it is' with 'what it should be' and then 'what it should be' is truly realized. When remembering that other shamanistic myths have remained at the stay of 'what it is', it seems that <Sekyungbonpuli> has entered into the stage of 'what it should be' beyond 'what it is'.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 전승혜, "트롤로프의 서술담론 서술이론과 문학비평" 서울대 출판부 120-, 1999

2 현용준, "제주도 신화" 1996

3 권태효, "제주도 무속서사시 생성원리에 대한 새로운 고찰" 民俗學會 1999

4 장주근, "제주도 무속과 서사무가" 62-67, 2001

5 한창훈, "제주도 무가에 형상화된 여성 의 성격" 濟州學會 99-, 1998

6 "제주도 巫俗神話의 몇 가지 특징" 1985

7 "이 논문은 2006년 1월 31일 투고 완료되어"

8 김상욱, "소설 담론 분석의 방법론 재고" 한국현대소설학회 402-, 1999

9 고은지, "세경본풀이> 여성인물의 형상화 방향과 내용 구성의 특질" 民俗學會 73-75, 1999

10 김화경, "세경 본풀이의 신화학적 고찰" 62-, 1982

11 "백중의 기원과 성격" 民俗學會 1993

12 길태숙, "밭매기노래>에 나타난 '남편찾기'와 '결합'의 의미" 2003

13 申蓮雨, "바보형제 이야기의 신화적 해명" 韓國古典文學會 332-339, 1997

14 좌혜경, "문화적 영웅에 대한 이미지" 民俗學會 1998

15 이수자, "무속신화 이공본풀이의 신화적 의미와 문화사적 의미" 濟州學會 38-42, 1993

16 조동일, "동아시아 구비서사시의 양상과 변천" 105-, 1997

17 禹漢鎔, "韓國現代小說談論硏究" 34-, 1996

18 "韓國巫歌의 硏究" 87-, 1980

19 "殊異傳 逸文의 신화적 성격과 교환 가능성의 실현 양상" 207-211, 2004

20 "巫俗神話와 文獻神話" 56-57, 1992

21 "A World View Base and a Discourse Structure of "

22 신태수, "<桃花女·鼻荊郞>說話의 構成原理와 對稱的 世界觀의 向方" 한민족어문학회 (45) : 449-476, 2004

23 "2006년 3월 13일 심사위원 및 편집위원 회의에서 게재 결정된 논문임"

24 "2006년 2월 3일부터 3월 6일까지 심사위원이 심사하고"