RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    안동(安東) 김문(金門)의 지식논쟁과 지식권력의 형성 -농암(農巖) 금창협(金昌協)의 학문적 입장을 중심으로- = Knowledge Debates of the Kims of Andong and the Formation of Knowledge Power: The Case of the Academic Position of Nong-am Kim Chang-hyeop

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99554542

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The ideological legitimacy or the truth of knowledge that made the Kims of Andong keep their power as a political group for a long period was obtained by the intellectual researches and debates of the educated persons from the Kims of Andong. Considering the theoretical researches and debates, the main character was Kim Chang-hyeop, and his younger brother, Kim Chang-heup and his grandson, Kim Won-haeng took over his ideas. The disputes related with them were the debate on perception, the criticism on Park Se-dang``s Sabyeonrok (A Record of Speculation), and the controversy on the human nature and animal nature. Through the three debates, the Kims of Andong established the academic identity of their own, and secured the status of the theoretical spokesperson in Noron (Patriarch``s faction) of Seoin (Westerner). Especially through the disputes on the human nature and animal nature, they could get the theoretical identity of Nangnon (theory of Nak) that differentiated themselves from the intellectuals of Horon (theory of Ho). They embraced the criticism and view of Toegye``s philosophy even though they succeeded in the theories of Zhu Xi and Yi I, and therefore the academic position of them helped them to get the capacious mind of the group in power with the flexibility based on the vested rights of Seoin Noron.
    번역하기

    The ideological legitimacy or the truth of knowledge that made the Kims of Andong keep their power as a political group for a long period was obtained by the intellectual researches and debates of the educated persons from the Kims of Andong. Consider...

    The ideological legitimacy or the truth of knowledge that made the Kims of Andong keep their power as a political group for a long period was obtained by the intellectual researches and debates of the educated persons from the Kims of Andong. Considering the theoretical researches and debates, the main character was Kim Chang-hyeop, and his younger brother, Kim Chang-heup and his grandson, Kim Won-haeng took over his ideas. The disputes related with them were the debate on perception, the criticism on Park Se-dang``s Sabyeonrok (A Record of Speculation), and the controversy on the human nature and animal nature. Through the three debates, the Kims of Andong established the academic identity of their own, and secured the status of the theoretical spokesperson in Noron (Patriarch``s faction) of Seoin (Westerner). Especially through the disputes on the human nature and animal nature, they could get the theoretical identity of Nangnon (theory of Nak) that differentiated themselves from the intellectuals of Horon (theory of Ho). They embraced the criticism and view of Toegye``s philosophy even though they succeeded in the theories of Zhu Xi and Yi I, and therefore the academic position of them helped them to get the capacious mind of the group in power with the flexibility based on the vested rights of Seoin Noron.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼