RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      EU 제조물책임지침 개정안의 주요 내용과 시사점 – 디지털 기술 및 순환경제 관련 규정을 중심으로 – = The Implication of the revision of the EU Product Liability Directive : Focusing on digital technology and circular economy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108442524

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The revision of EU Product Liability Directive make rules to work better for new digital technologies, circular economies and global value chains, and products such as software, artificial intelligence(AI) systems or digital services are now explicitly included in liability rules. It is an internal assessment that the revision will ensure that consumers continue to be effectively protected against damage caused by products, and will help reduce costs and give companies the confidence they need to invest in innovative products through harmonious EU regulations.
      It is meaningful to expand the scope of liability of products to SW at a time when artificial intelligence is becoming the center of the industry or economy, and the traditional manufacturing industry is declaring a transformation to SW companies.
      When PLD was implemented in 1985, there is a big difference now from the industrial environment. In current, software is downloaded and used on smart devices or cloud-type access-type services are the mainstream. Above all, the amendment stipulates artificial intelligence or SW in specific forms in economic or industrial activities. In many cases, black-boxed artificial intelligence cannot explain how developers have reached a conclusion, and problems arising from services using artificial intelligence or performed by artificial intelligence are not known, so the responsibility is unclear and it is not easy to compensate victims.
      The EU is pushing for revision of PLD or AI-related legislation to recognize product liability regardless of product characteristics if artificial intelligence is included. Given that artificial intelligence is becoming black-boxed and that humans cannot confirm or explain the decision-making process, it would be reasonable to burden AI developers or manufacturers with responsibility for problems and accidents.
      번역하기

      The revision of EU Product Liability Directive make rules to work better for new digital technologies, circular economies and global value chains, and products such as software, artificial intelligence(AI) systems or digital services are now explicitl...

      The revision of EU Product Liability Directive make rules to work better for new digital technologies, circular economies and global value chains, and products such as software, artificial intelligence(AI) systems or digital services are now explicitly included in liability rules. It is an internal assessment that the revision will ensure that consumers continue to be effectively protected against damage caused by products, and will help reduce costs and give companies the confidence they need to invest in innovative products through harmonious EU regulations.
      It is meaningful to expand the scope of liability of products to SW at a time when artificial intelligence is becoming the center of the industry or economy, and the traditional manufacturing industry is declaring a transformation to SW companies.
      When PLD was implemented in 1985, there is a big difference now from the industrial environment. In current, software is downloaded and used on smart devices or cloud-type access-type services are the mainstream. Above all, the amendment stipulates artificial intelligence or SW in specific forms in economic or industrial activities. In many cases, black-boxed artificial intelligence cannot explain how developers have reached a conclusion, and problems arising from services using artificial intelligence or performed by artificial intelligence are not known, so the responsibility is unclear and it is not easy to compensate victims.
      The EU is pushing for revision of PLD or AI-related legislation to recognize product liability regardless of product characteristics if artificial intelligence is included. Given that artificial intelligence is becoming black-boxed and that humans cannot confirm or explain the decision-making process, it would be reasonable to burden AI developers or manufacturers with responsibility for problems and accidents.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 한국소비자보호원, "제조물책임법 해설 및 사례" 2002

      2 권오승, "제조물책임법" 법문사 2002

      3 김제완, "전자거래의 유형에 따른 제조물 결함사고에 대한 소비자 보호" 한국법제연구원 2002

      4 김윤명, "블랙박스를 열기 위한 인공지능법" 박영사 2022

      5 윤지영, "법과학을 적용한 형사사법의 선진화 방안(Ⅵ)" 형사정책연구원 2015

      6 김윤명, "SW제조물책임 관련 법제 현황 조사연구" 소프트웨어정책연구소 2017

      7 "Questions and answers on the revision of the Product Liability Directive"

      8 "Questions & Answers: AI Liability Directive"

      9 "Evaluation of Product Liability Directive, SWD(2018)157"

      1 한국소비자보호원, "제조물책임법 해설 및 사례" 2002

      2 권오승, "제조물책임법" 법문사 2002

      3 김제완, "전자거래의 유형에 따른 제조물 결함사고에 대한 소비자 보호" 한국법제연구원 2002

      4 김윤명, "블랙박스를 열기 위한 인공지능법" 박영사 2022

      5 윤지영, "법과학을 적용한 형사사법의 선진화 방안(Ⅵ)" 형사정책연구원 2015

      6 김윤명, "SW제조물책임 관련 법제 현황 조사연구" 소프트웨어정책연구소 2017

      7 "Questions and answers on the revision of the Product Liability Directive"

      8 "Questions & Answers: AI Liability Directive"

      9 "Evaluation of Product Liability Directive, SWD(2018)157"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼