RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    16세기 'ㅅ·ㅂ'의 기능에 대한 고찰 = A Study on the Functions of 'Sop' in the Sixteenth Century.

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40135158

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    It has been understood that ‘Sop’ is the mark of ‘object honorific’ or ‘speaker·subject modesty’. This study, however, defined it as the mark of ‘speaker modesty.’ It was based on the belief that we came to the most reasonable conclusion when understanding ‘sop’ focusing on ‘the speaker.’
    To prove it we suggested that we define ‘sop’ as the mark of ‘modesty’ and then focus on the ‘speaker’ instead of ‘object.’ The reason is that we observed ‘sop’ is used for ‘listener’ as well as ‘object,’ and also appears in the case hard to assume the object; as a result, we came to think the consistent and concise description is possible when focusing on the speaker, whereas we are not able to explain some other examples when focusing on the object like the existing point of view.
    Through the above demonstration, this study defined ‘sop’ as the mark of ‘speaker modesty’, proved that we could give a natural explanation for the examples not covered by the previous viewpoint, and emphasized again that we came to the most reasonable conclusion when understanding ‘sop’ from the speaker-centered perspective.(Chonnam National University)
    번역하기

    It has been understood that ‘Sop’ is the mark of ‘object honorific’ or ‘speaker·subject modesty’. This study, however, defined it as the mark of ‘speaker modesty.’ It was based on the belief that we came to the most reasonable conclus...

    It has been understood that ‘Sop’ is the mark of ‘object honorific’ or ‘speaker·subject modesty’. This study, however, defined it as the mark of ‘speaker modesty.’ It was based on the belief that we came to the most reasonable conclusion when understanding ‘sop’ focusing on ‘the speaker.’
    To prove it we suggested that we define ‘sop’ as the mark of ‘modesty’ and then focus on the ‘speaker’ instead of ‘object.’ The reason is that we observed ‘sop’ is used for ‘listener’ as well as ‘object,’ and also appears in the case hard to assume the object; as a result, we came to think the consistent and concise description is possible when focusing on the speaker, whereas we are not able to explain some other examples when focusing on the object like the existing point of view.
    Through the above demonstration, this study defined ‘sop’ as the mark of ‘speaker modesty’, proved that we could give a natural explanation for the examples not covered by the previous viewpoint, and emphasized again that we came to the most reasonable conclusion when understanding ‘sop’ from the speaker-centered perspective.(Chonnam National University)

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • ABSTRACT
    • 1.머리말
    • 2.`삽`의 기능
    • 3.맺음말
    • 참고문헌
    • ABSTRACT
    • 1.머리말
    • 2.`삽`의 기능
    • 3.맺음말
    • 참고문헌
    • 저자소개
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼