RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    하우저와 부르디외: 장의 상대점 자율성의 관점에서 반영론의 재해석 = Hauser and Bourdieu: A Reinterpretation of Reflectionism in the light of relative autonomy of Field

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99607649

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper aims to reinterpret the theory of Pierre Bourdieu and Arnold Hauser, and try to find sociological perspective to view the current aspect aspect of art. As we know, sociology has emphasized the relation between art and sociery, which shapes as so called ``reflectionism`` , Reflectionism supposes ``direct`` relation of art and society. Hauser, who was both the art historian and sociologist, clearly recognized the limit of reflctionism. Such direct relation of art and society produces art as either passive mirror of external world or propaganda. Hauser admitted the relation, but developed it to the concept of art as ideology. Here the relation of art and society could be apprehended as broad and compressive one. But, Hauser also could not escape the limit of reflectionism. He didn`t explain the process and mechanism of interwinding of art and society fully. In this context, Bourdieu`s concept of field has very important meaning. Field is the middle space that interacts with outer social space, but accomplishes the relative autonomy. I think we could attain the revised version of the relation art and society fully. In this context, Bourdieu`s concept of field has very important meaning. Field is the middle space that interacts with outer social space, but accomplishes the relative autonomy. I think we could attain the revised version of the relation art and society or the concept of ``refracted reflection`` when we reinterpret the Hauser`s art as ideology in the light of Bourdieu`s field. This revised reflection` when we reinterpret the Hauser`s art as ideology in the light of Bourdieu`s field. This revised reflectionism can not only combine the sociological perspective and accomplishment of Hauser coherently, but also discover the empirical possibility that Bourdieu loses in his abstract theoretical view on art. And I think that these combining and discovering could proceed in the way that both Bourdieu and Hauser complement each other. I wish to examine restrictively such possibility in the Hauser`s description on the situation of French stylistic art world in 17th century. It was such differential situation of stylistic field of French of the time that made the Classicism as officialized style in the heart of the 17th century Europe which Heinrich Wofflin, one of the greatest art historian, defined as typical Baroque period.
    번역하기

    This paper aims to reinterpret the theory of Pierre Bourdieu and Arnold Hauser, and try to find sociological perspective to view the current aspect aspect of art. As we know, sociology has emphasized the relation between art and sociery, which shapes ...

    This paper aims to reinterpret the theory of Pierre Bourdieu and Arnold Hauser, and try to find sociological perspective to view the current aspect aspect of art. As we know, sociology has emphasized the relation between art and sociery, which shapes as so called ``reflectionism`` , Reflectionism supposes ``direct`` relation of art and society. Hauser, who was both the art historian and sociologist, clearly recognized the limit of reflctionism. Such direct relation of art and society produces art as either passive mirror of external world or propaganda. Hauser admitted the relation, but developed it to the concept of art as ideology. Here the relation of art and society could be apprehended as broad and compressive one. But, Hauser also could not escape the limit of reflectionism. He didn`t explain the process and mechanism of interwinding of art and society fully. In this context, Bourdieu`s concept of field has very important meaning. Field is the middle space that interacts with outer social space, but accomplishes the relative autonomy. I think we could attain the revised version of the relation art and society fully. In this context, Bourdieu`s concept of field has very important meaning. Field is the middle space that interacts with outer social space, but accomplishes the relative autonomy. I think we could attain the revised version of the relation art and society or the concept of ``refracted reflection`` when we reinterpret the Hauser`s art as ideology in the light of Bourdieu`s field. This revised reflection` when we reinterpret the Hauser`s art as ideology in the light of Bourdieu`s field. This revised reflectionism can not only combine the sociological perspective and accomplishment of Hauser coherently, but also discover the empirical possibility that Bourdieu loses in his abstract theoretical view on art. And I think that these combining and discovering could proceed in the way that both Bourdieu and Hauser complement each other. I wish to examine restrictively such possibility in the Hauser`s description on the situation of French stylistic art world in 17th century. It was such differential situation of stylistic field of French of the time that made the Classicism as officialized style in the heart of the 17th century Europe which Heinrich Wofflin, one of the greatest art historian, defined as typical Baroque period.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼