RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      장애아동가족의 Resilience 관련 요인척도의 개발

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3153505

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study was to develop scales pertaining to the different factors in order to better understand resilience factors in families of children with disabilities. 127 families who had children with disabilities participated in this study. A review of the literature was first conducted to determine different factors and relevant questions. A factor analysis was conducted to verify the construct validity of the factors and the questions. As a result, 7 questions were derived for one factor for FPSC. FHI consisted of four factors and 15 questions pertaining to $quot;control$quot;, $quot;challenge$quot;, $quot;coping characteristics$quot;, and $quot;committment$quot;. 12 questions and three factors ($quot;community emotional support$quot;, $quot;community altruistic support$quot;, $quot;community network support$quot;) comprised the SSI. FSCH-E consisted of three factors and 19 questions: $quot;ethnic belief$quot;, $quot;family value$quot;, and $quot;family identity$quot;. The scale that measures family adjustment, FACI8 comprised of three factors and 13 questions: $quot;flexibility$quot;, $quot;bonding$quot;, and $quot;cohesion$quot;. FMWB consisted of a single factor and 6 questions. A Cronbach α was computed for each scale for reliability purpose. A favorable reliability value in the range of .77 to .85 was established. The results proved FPSC, FHI, SSI, FSCH-E, FACI 8, and FMWB to be viable scales that can study resilience in families of children with disabilities. The scales will assist in establishing a resilience model and furthermore in identifying critical factors that determine resilience.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to develop scales pertaining to the different factors in order to better understand resilience factors in families of children with disabilities. 127 families who had children with disabilities participated in this study....

      The purpose of this study was to develop scales pertaining to the different factors in order to better understand resilience factors in families of children with disabilities. 127 families who had children with disabilities participated in this study. A review of the literature was first conducted to determine different factors and relevant questions. A factor analysis was conducted to verify the construct validity of the factors and the questions. As a result, 7 questions were derived for one factor for FPSC. FHI consisted of four factors and 15 questions pertaining to $quot;control$quot;, $quot;challenge$quot;, $quot;coping characteristics$quot;, and $quot;committment$quot;. 12 questions and three factors ($quot;community emotional support$quot;, $quot;community altruistic support$quot;, $quot;community network support$quot;) comprised the SSI. FSCH-E consisted of three factors and 19 questions: $quot;ethnic belief$quot;, $quot;family value$quot;, and $quot;family identity$quot;. The scale that measures family adjustment, FACI8 comprised of three factors and 13 questions: $quot;flexibility$quot;, $quot;bonding$quot;, and $quot;cohesion$quot;. FMWB consisted of a single factor and 6 questions. A Cronbach α was computed for each scale for reliability purpose. A favorable reliability value in the range of .77 to .85 was established. The results proved FPSC, FHI, SSI, FSCH-E, FACI 8, and FMWB to be viable scales that can study resilience in families of children with disabilities. The scales will assist in establishing a resilience model and furthermore in identifying critical factors that determine resilience.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼