1930년대 말 임화의 언어론

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper aims to clear up the linguistic theory of Rim Hwa in the late 1930's. It looks like that his theory of language is nationalistic. But he prefered the language of nation and people, not because it was popular and nationalistic, but because it was realistic language. He did not stand on the linguistic nationalism or linguistic essentialism. Externally they are against linguistic imperialism, but internally behalf of it. In those days there were linguistic essentionalist(Han Hyo and Lee Tae-jun) and linguistic imperialist(Kim Yong-je). They were against each other about whether Korean should be abolished and be substituted for Japanese or not. But they were on the same theory that language is nation. Rim Hwa was very typical in this point. He did not think that language is nation. Ironically By this theory he can assert the maintenance of Korean.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• 1. 공학과 조선 문단
• 2. 1930년대말의 언어 상황
• 3. 민족·민중의 언어
• 4. 제삼의 언어론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "金龍濟(1939.7.27), ｢眞實と普遍性｣, 『京城日報』"

2 윤대석, "조선어의 ‘마지막 수업’" 한국학연구소 (18) : 241-260, 2008

3 와타나베 나오키(渡？ 直紀), "임화의 언어론" 국어국문학회 (138) : 433-460, 2004

4 "임화(1939.8.16～20), ｢言葉を意識する｣, 『경성일보』"

5 "임화(1936.3.8～24), ｢조선어의 위기하의 조선문학｣, 『조선중앙일보』"

6 임화, "예술적 인식표현의 수단으로서의 언어" 1936

7 임화, "언어의 현실성" 1936

8 임화, "언어의 마술성" 1936

9 윤대석, "언어와 식민지 in: 식민지 국민문학론" 역락 2006

10 임화, "언어와 문학" 1934

11 좌담회, "문학자의 자기비판" 1946

12 임화(, "문학어로서의 조선어" 1939

13 임화, "문학과 언어" 1935

14 임화, "문예의 융성과 어문정리" 1938

15 윤해동, "근대를 다시 읽는다1" 역사비평사 2006

16 "韓曉(1939.7.14), ｢國文文學問題｣, 『京城日報』"

17 編輯部, "朝鮮文學についての一つの疑問" 1940

18 座談會, "朝鮮文化の將來" 1939

19 玄永燮, "朝鮮人の進むべき道" 綠旗聯盟 1938

20 時枝誠記, "朝鮮に於ける国語政策及び國語敎育の將來" 1942

21 兪鎭午, "張赫宙氏へ in:帝國大學新聞" 1939

22 時枝誠記, "國語學への道" 明治書院 1976