RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      남강댐유역 내 주요 하천관측지점의 홍수유출량 추정을 위한 단위도 모형 비교연구 = A Comparative Study of Unit Hydrograph Models for Flood Runoff Estimation for the Streamflow Stations in Namgang-Dam Watershed

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100923949

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this study, three different unit hydrograph methods (NRCS, Snyder and Clark) in the HEC-HMS were compared to find better fit with the observed data in the Namgang-Dam watershed. The Sancheong, Shinan, and Changchon in Namgang-Dam watershed were selected as the study watersheds. The input data for HEC-HMS were calculated land use, digital elevation map, stream, and watershed map provided by WAter Management Information System (WAMIS). Sixty six storms from 2004 to 2011 were selected for model calibration and validation. Three unit hydrograph methods were compared with the observed data in terms of simulated runoff volume, and peak runoff for the selected storms. The results showed that the coefficient of determination ($R^2$) for the peak runoff was 0.8295~0.9999 and root mean square error (RMSE) was 0.029~0.086 mm/day for calibration stages. In the model validation, $R^2$ for the peak runoff was 0.9061~0.9916 and RMSE was 0.030~0.088 mm/day which were more accurate than calibrated data. Analysis of variance showed that there was no significant difference among the three unit hydrograph methods.
      번역하기

      In this study, three different unit hydrograph methods (NRCS, Snyder and Clark) in the HEC-HMS were compared to find better fit with the observed data in the Namgang-Dam watershed. The Sancheong, Shinan, and Changchon in Namgang-Dam watershed were sel...

      In this study, three different unit hydrograph methods (NRCS, Snyder and Clark) in the HEC-HMS were compared to find better fit with the observed data in the Namgang-Dam watershed. The Sancheong, Shinan, and Changchon in Namgang-Dam watershed were selected as the study watersheds. The input data for HEC-HMS were calculated land use, digital elevation map, stream, and watershed map provided by WAter Management Information System (WAMIS). Sixty six storms from 2004 to 2011 were selected for model calibration and validation. Three unit hydrograph methods were compared with the observed data in terms of simulated runoff volume, and peak runoff for the selected storms. The results showed that the coefficient of determination ($R^2$) for the peak runoff was 0.8295~0.9999 and root mean square error (RMSE) was 0.029~0.086 mm/day for calibration stages. In the model validation, $R^2$ for the peak runoff was 0.9061~0.9916 and RMSE was 0.030~0.088 mm/day which were more accurate than calibrated data. Analysis of variance showed that there was no significant difference among the three unit hydrograph methods.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이지호, "선행함수조건을 고려한 유역대표 집중시간 및 저류상수의 결정" 한국방재학회 11 (11): 255-264, 2011

      2 김성재, "산림지역의 유출특성을 고려한 남강댐유역내 주요 하천관측지점에 대한 홍수유출량 추정" 한국농공학회 52 (52): 85-94, 2010

      3 성충현, "농업소유역의 홍수유출량 추정을 위한 단위도 모형 비교연구" 한국농공학회 50 (50): 19-36, 2008

      4 KWRA, "Stream design standard" Korea Water Resources Association 2005

      5 Sonu, J. H., "Revision of Snyder's Coefficient for Synthesizing Unit Hydrograph" 19 (19): 57-63, 1986

      6 MLTM, "Planning Research of Flood Defence Technology for Next Generatio" Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs 2008

      7 USACE, "Modeling System HEC-HMS, Technical Reference Manual"

      8 Heo, K. S., "Hydrologic soil group classification for Korea soil and its application" (4) : 48-60, 1988

      9 이상호, "HEC-HMS와 HEC-RAS를 이용한 지리산 국립공원 달궁 유역 침수 모의" 농업생명과학연구원 42 (42): 21-29, 2008

      10 김상민, "HEC-HMS 모형과 HEC-GeoHMS 모듈을 이용한 농업소유역의 홍수유출 해석" 한국농공학회 45 (45): 119-127, 2003

      1 이지호, "선행함수조건을 고려한 유역대표 집중시간 및 저류상수의 결정" 한국방재학회 11 (11): 255-264, 2011

      2 김성재, "산림지역의 유출특성을 고려한 남강댐유역내 주요 하천관측지점에 대한 홍수유출량 추정" 한국농공학회 52 (52): 85-94, 2010

      3 성충현, "농업소유역의 홍수유출량 추정을 위한 단위도 모형 비교연구" 한국농공학회 50 (50): 19-36, 2008

      4 KWRA, "Stream design standard" Korea Water Resources Association 2005

      5 Sonu, J. H., "Revision of Snyder's Coefficient for Synthesizing Unit Hydrograph" 19 (19): 57-63, 1986

      6 MLTM, "Planning Research of Flood Defence Technology for Next Generatio" Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs 2008

      7 USACE, "Modeling System HEC-HMS, Technical Reference Manual"

      8 Heo, K. S., "Hydrologic soil group classification for Korea soil and its application" (4) : 48-60, 1988

      9 이상호, "HEC-HMS와 HEC-RAS를 이용한 지리산 국립공원 달궁 유역 침수 모의" 농업생명과학연구원 42 (42): 21-29, 2008

      10 김상민, "HEC-HMS 모형과 HEC-GeoHMS 모듈을 이용한 농업소유역의 홍수유출 해석" 한국농공학회 45 (45): 119-127, 2003

      11 USACE, "HEC-HMS (version 3.4): Hydrologic Modeling System, User's Manual"

      12 Im, S. J., "Estimating Runoff Curve Numbers for Paddy Fields" 30 (30): 379-387, 1997

      13 Kim, C. G., "Estimating Peak Flow Considering the Runoff Characteristics in Paddies from Small Agricultural Watersheds" Seoul University 1999

      14 Kim, H. J., "Development of two-parametric hyperbolic model for daily streamflow simulation" Seoul University 2001

      15 Jeong, J. Y., "Continuous Streamflow Simulation Using Baseflow Separation and Nash's Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph" Dankook University 2007

      16 Seong, C. H., "A Comparative Study of Unit Hydrograph Models using HEC-HMS at a small watershed" Seoul University 2004

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2015-12-02 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-06-07 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국농공학회지 -> 한국농공학회논문집 KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.53 0.53 0.45
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.41 0.41 0.525 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼