RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    지역사회의 폭력남편과 가정폭력범죄 행위자들의 특성 비교

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103478791

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    본 연구는 사회에 노출되지 않은 지역사회의 폭력남편들과 사법부의 처벌을 받은 아내폭력 가해남성들의 중요한 특성이 무엇이며, 서로 어떻게 다른지 밝히고자 하였다. 이를 위해 152명 비폭력 남성들과 사법체계의 사회기관과 접촉이 없는 82명 폭력남편들, 그리고 가정폭력범죄 처벌을 받은 336명 행위자들을 세 집단으로 분류해서 비교하였다. 다항로지스틱 회귀분석의 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 비폭력 또는 지역사회 폭력집단을 예측하는 요인들은 자녀폭력, 부부평등결정권, 소득으로 나타났다. 법원의 처벌을 받은 행위자들은 아내폭력을 허용하는 태도, 학력, 자녀폭력, 질투심에서 비폭력 남편들과 구별되고 있었다. 사법체계에 노출되지 않은 지역사회의 폭력남편들은 노출된 집단보다 학력이 높고, 결혼기간이 길며, 스트레스 수준이 월등하게 높았다. 반면 가정폭력범죄 행위자들은 지역사회 폭력남편들에 비해 알코올 문제와 폭력을 허용하는 태도를 더 많이 가지고 있었다. 본 연구는 총 333명을 대상으로 MCMI-III 척도에서 제시하는 성격을 유형별로 살펴보았다. 지역사회 폭력남편들은 다른 두 집단에 비해 수동공격적인 성향이 강하고, 사법체계 행위자들보다 자기애성이 강한 것으로 나타났다. 사법체계 폭력집단에서는 상대집단들과 비교할 때 외상 후 스트레스장애만이 고유한 특성으로 발견되었다. 이러한 결과들을 기초로 이론적 논의와 실천적 방안이 제시되었다.
    번역하기

    본 연구는 사회에 노출되지 않은 지역사회의 폭력남편들과 사법부의 처벌을 받은 아내폭력 가해남성들의 중요한 특성이 무엇이며, 서로 어떻게 다른지 밝히고자 하였다. 이를 위해 152명 비...

    본 연구는 사회에 노출되지 않은 지역사회의 폭력남편들과 사법부의 처벌을 받은 아내폭력 가해남성들의 중요한 특성이 무엇이며, 서로 어떻게 다른지 밝히고자 하였다. 이를 위해 152명 비폭력 남성들과 사법체계의 사회기관과 접촉이 없는 82명 폭력남편들, 그리고 가정폭력범죄 처벌을 받은 336명 행위자들을 세 집단으로 분류해서 비교하였다. 다항로지스틱 회귀분석의 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 비폭력 또는 지역사회 폭력집단을 예측하는 요인들은 자녀폭력, 부부평등결정권, 소득으로 나타났다. 법원의 처벌을 받은 행위자들은 아내폭력을 허용하는 태도, 학력, 자녀폭력, 질투심에서 비폭력 남편들과 구별되고 있었다. 사법체계에 노출되지 않은 지역사회의 폭력남편들은 노출된 집단보다 학력이 높고, 결혼기간이 길며, 스트레스 수준이 월등하게 높았다. 반면 가정폭력범죄 행위자들은 지역사회 폭력남편들에 비해 알코올 문제와 폭력을 허용하는 태도를 더 많이 가지고 있었다. 본 연구는 총 333명을 대상으로 MCMI-III 척도에서 제시하는 성격을 유형별로 살펴보았다. 지역사회 폭력남편들은 다른 두 집단에 비해 수동공격적인 성향이 강하고, 사법체계 행위자들보다 자기애성이 강한 것으로 나타났다. 사법체계 폭력집단에서는 상대집단들과 비교할 때 외상 후 스트레스장애만이 고유한 특성으로 발견되었다. 이러한 결과들을 기초로 이론적 논의와 실천적 방안이 제시되었다.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The present study explored and compared the risk factors of two subtypes of maritally violent men with those of a nonviolent comparison group. One type of batterers consisted of a community sample, and the other was sought from the criminal justice system. The identities of the male community batterers were not exposed to the society since their victims did not contact any of the social service agents related to domestic violence.
    To identify the different characteristics associated with two subtypes of woman abusers, a total of 152 nonviolent men, 82 male community batterers, and 336 offenders in a criminal justice system were considered. The results of the descriptive analysis showed that the level of physical violence of the community batterers was two times lower than that of the batterers who received legal punishments. The results of the multinominal logistic regression were as follows:(1) The variables that distinguished the male community batterers from the nonviolent men were the use of physical violence towards children, marital decision power, and income. (2) Four factors had been found to distinguish batterers in the criminal justice system from nonbatterers, namely: attitudes towards woman battering, education, violence towards children, and level of jealousy. (3) The community batterers showed a higher level of education and of stress as well as a longer period of marital relationship compared to the batterers in the criminal justice system. On the other hand, the batterers who received legal punishments had more severe alcohol problems and had an accepting attitude towards the use of violence.
    This study also investigated psychopathology among batterers using MCMI-Ⅲ, based on 333 subjects. In terms of the mean scores, there were no subscales associated with personality pathology in all the male groups. Based on the logit model, the community batterers showed a stronger tendency towards having a passive-aggressive personality than did their counterparts, and they recorded a higher level of narcissism compared to the court-referred battering men. Post-traumatic stress was the only symptom that distinguished the batterers who received legal punishments from the other groups. The theoretical and practical implications of these results were pointed out and discussed in the paper.
    번역하기

    The present study explored and compared the risk factors of two subtypes of maritally violent men with those of a nonviolent comparison group. One type of batterers consisted of a community sample, and the other was sought from the criminal justice sy...

    The present study explored and compared the risk factors of two subtypes of maritally violent men with those of a nonviolent comparison group. One type of batterers consisted of a community sample, and the other was sought from the criminal justice system. The identities of the male community batterers were not exposed to the society since their victims did not contact any of the social service agents related to domestic violence.
    To identify the different characteristics associated with two subtypes of woman abusers, a total of 152 nonviolent men, 82 male community batterers, and 336 offenders in a criminal justice system were considered. The results of the descriptive analysis showed that the level of physical violence of the community batterers was two times lower than that of the batterers who received legal punishments. The results of the multinominal logistic regression were as follows:(1) The variables that distinguished the male community batterers from the nonviolent men were the use of physical violence towards children, marital decision power, and income. (2) Four factors had been found to distinguish batterers in the criminal justice system from nonbatterers, namely: attitudes towards woman battering, education, violence towards children, and level of jealousy. (3) The community batterers showed a higher level of education and of stress as well as a longer period of marital relationship compared to the batterers in the criminal justice system. On the other hand, the batterers who received legal punishments had more severe alcohol problems and had an accepting attitude towards the use of violence.
    This study also investigated psychopathology among batterers using MCMI-Ⅲ, based on 333 subjects. In terms of the mean scores, there were no subscales associated with personality pathology in all the male groups. Based on the logit model, the community batterers showed a stronger tendency towards having a passive-aggressive personality than did their counterparts, and they recorded a higher level of narcissism compared to the court-referred battering men. Post-traumatic stress was the only symptom that distinguished the batterers who received legal punishments from the other groups. The theoretical and practical implications of these results were pointed out and discussed in the paper.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 요약
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 폭력남편 특성에 관한 선행연구 검토
    • 3. 연구방법
    • 4. 연구결과
    • 요약
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 폭력남편 특성에 관한 선행연구 검토
    • 3. 연구방법
    • 4. 연구결과
    • 5. 요약 및 논의
    • 참고문헌
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김재엽, "한국가정폭력의 실태와 사회복지 개입의 필요성" 1-37, 1998

    2 장희숙, "아내폭력가정 자녀의 적응에 영향을 미치는 요인들: 쉼터 거주 아동을 중심으로" 한국사회복지학회 55 : 255-281, 2003

    3 김병수, "개인 및 가정환경 변인에 따른 아내학대의 인식과 경험" 1999

    4 정숙영, "가정폭력에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구" 1997

    5 장희숙, "가정폭력 행위자의 유형" 56 (56): 303-325, 2004

    6 "“부부갈등이 부부폭력과 자녀학대에 미치는 영향”" 1991

    7 "“기혼남성의 스트레스와 폭력과의 인과관계”" 1994

    8 Bowlby, "“Violence in the Family as a Disorder of the Attachment and Caregiving System American Journal of Psychoanalysis 44" 9-27, 1984

    9 A, "“Typologies of Male Batterers Three Subtypes and the Differences among Them" 476-497, 1994

    10 Kantor, "“The drunken bum theory of wife beating 203-224 in Physical Violence in American Families edited by M" 1990

    1 김재엽, "한국가정폭력의 실태와 사회복지 개입의 필요성" 1-37, 1998

    2 장희숙, "아내폭력가정 자녀의 적응에 영향을 미치는 요인들: 쉼터 거주 아동을 중심으로" 한국사회복지학회 55 : 255-281, 2003

    3 김병수, "개인 및 가정환경 변인에 따른 아내학대의 인식과 경험" 1999

    4 정숙영, "가정폭력에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구" 1997

    5 장희숙, "가정폭력 행위자의 유형" 56 (56): 303-325, 2004

    6 "“부부갈등이 부부폭력과 자녀학대에 미치는 영향”" 1991

    7 "“기혼남성의 스트레스와 폭력과의 인과관계”" 1994

    8 Bowlby, "“Violence in the Family as a Disorder of the Attachment and Caregiving System American Journal of Psychoanalysis 44" 9-27, 1984

    9 A, "“Typologies of Male Batterers Three Subtypes and the Differences among Them" 476-497, 1994

    10 Kantor, "“The drunken bum theory of wife beating 203-224 in Physical Violence in American Families edited by M" 1990

    11 White, "“The Social Psychology of Romantic Jealousy" 5449-, 1977

    12 Hart, "“The Prevalence of Personality Disorders Among Wife Assaulters Journal of Personality Disorder 7" Dutton 329-341, 1993

    13 Saunders, "“The Inventory of Beliefs about Wife Beating The Construction and Initial Validation of a Measure of Beliefs and Attitudes" 39-57, 1987

    14 "“The Index of Clinical Stress A Brief Measure of Subjective Stress for Practice and Research" 12-15, 1991

    15 Dibble, "“Some Social Structure Determinants of Inconsistency Between Attitudes and Behavior Journal of Marriage and the Family 42" 71-80, 1980

    16 in Forensic Psychology, "“Social Stress and Marital Violence in a National Sample of American Families edited by F New York Academy of Sciences 213-234 in The Dark Side of Families edited by D “Social Stress and Marital Violence in a National Sample of American Families 181-202 in Physical Violence in American Families edited by M" ------1980

    17 Osmond, "“Sex and Sexism a Comparison of Male and Female Sex-Role Attitudes Journal of Marriage and the Family" 1975

    18 "“Procedures for Removing Social Desirability Bias from Self-Reports of Violence Journal of Interpersonal Violence 6 “A Typology of Men Who Batter Women Three Types Derived from Cluster Analysis Journal of Orthopsychiatry 62" 337 264-345 275, ------1991------1992

    19 Hamberger, "“Personality Correlates of Men Who Abuse Their Partners “Personality Correlates of Men who Batter and Nonviolent Men Journal of Family Violence 6" 323 131-341 147, 1986

    20 Hastings, "“Personality Characteristics of Spouse Abusers" 31-48, 1988

    21 An Introduction, "“Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse 11-26 in Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse edited by M" 1988

    22 Murphy, "“Family Origin Violence and MCMI-II Psychopathology Among Partner Assaultive Men" 165-176, 1993

    23 and A, "“Borderline Personality in Perpetrators of Psychological and Physical Abuse" Dutton 327-337, 1993

    24 Neidig, "“Attitudinal Characteristics of Males Who Have Engaged in Spouse Abuse Journal of Family Violence 1" 223-233, 1986

    25 Hotaling, "“An Analysis of Risk Markers in Husband to Wife Violence" 101-124, 1986

    26 Gelles, "“Alcohol and Other Drugs are Associated with Violence in Current Controversies on Family Violence edited by R" ------1993b182-196

    27 Leonard, "“Alcohol and Marital Aggression in a National Sample of Young Men Journal of Interpersonal Violence 7" 199219-30

    28 Tolman, "“A Review of Quantitative Research on Men Who Batter Journal of Interpersonal Violence 5" 87-118, 1990

    29 Barnett, "“A Hostility-guilt Assessment of Counseled and Uncounseled Batters Paper presented at the Responses to Family Violence Research Conference" Purdue University 1989

    30 A, "in Current Controversies on Family Violence edited by R" 47-62, 1993

    31 Gelles, "in Current Controversies on Family Violence edited by R" 31-46, 1993a

    32 Coleman, "and Violence in an Nationally Representative Sample of American Couples in Physical Violence in American Families edited by M" 1990182-202

    33 O'Leary, "and Levels of Violence 7-30 in Current Controversies on Family Violence edited by R" 1993

    34 Cahn, "and Depression in Domestically Violent versus Generally Assaultive Men and Nonviolent Control Subjects Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 56" vitalia : 17-23, 1988

    35 MacEwen, "Violence in the Family of Origin Journal of Family Violence 3" 73-88, 1988

    36 Steinmetz, "Violence in the Family" 1974

    37 Katz, L. F.,, "Vagal Tone Protects Children from Marital Conflict" 7 : 83-92, 1995

    38 van der Kolk, "Trauma in Men Effects on Family Life in Abuse and Victimization Across the Life Span edited by M" Johns Hopkins University Press 170-185, 1988

    39 Dutton, D. G, "Through a Psychological Lens" Sage 5-18, 2005

    40 Selzer, "The Quest for a New Diagnostic Instrument American Journal of Psychiatry 127" 1653-1658, 1971

    41 Dutton, D. G, "The Domestic Assaults of Women2nd ed" University of British Columbia Press 1995

    42 Anger Control, "The Development and Evaluation of An Experimental Treatment" Lexington (vaco) : 1975

    43 "The Abusive Personality" Guilford 1998

    44 Cunradi, C. B, "Socioeconomic Predictors of Intimate Partner Violence Among White Black and Hispanic Couples in the United States" 17 (17): 377-389, 2002

    45 Straus, M. A, "Revised Conflict Tactics Scales(CTS2) : Development and Preliminary Psychometric Data" 17 (17): 283-316, 1996

    46 Quigley, B. M, "Resistance of Husband Aggression in the Early Years of Marriage" 11 : 355-370, 1996

    47 Briere, "Predicting self-reported likelihood of battering Research in Personality 21" 61-69, 1987

    48 Beasley, "Personality Characteristics of Male Spouse Abusers" 310-23 317, 1992

    49 "MCMI-III Results for Batterer Program Participants in Four Cities : Less Pathological Than Expected" 14 (14): 1-17, 1999

    50 Straus, "Journal of Marriage and the Family Feburary" 75-88, 1979

    51 Rosenbaum, "Journal of Family Violence 1" 121-130, 1986

    52 Barling, "Journal of Applied Psychology 71" 346-348, 1986

    53 Barnett, O. W, "Jealousy and Anxious Romantic Attachment in Maritally Violent and Nonviolent Males" 10 : 473-486, 1995

    54 Straus, "Estimates from the National Family Violence Resurvey and Other Studies in Physical Violence in American Families edited by M" 95-112, 1990

    55 Martin, "Counseling for Family Violence and Abuse Resource for Christian Counseling Series" 1986

    56 Rosenbaum, "Characteristics of Abusive Couples Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 49" 663-671, 1981

    57 Morrison, K. M, "A Survey of Massachusetts Batterer Intervention Programs Predicting Treatment Completion" Antioch New England Graduate School 1997

    58 Pokorny, "A Shortened Version of the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test American Journal of Psychiatry 129" 342-345, 1972

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2020 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2015-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.66 1.66 1.68
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.8 1.87 2.088 0.4
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼