RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    법인세율 인하를 전후한 중소기업의 특수한 이익조정 분석

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100856747

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study theoretically and empirically analyzes the tax-minimizing behavior of small and mid-sized enterprises ('SMEs' hereafter) around the tax rate reductions enacted in 2002 and 2005, which is qualitatively different from that of big enterprises ('BEs' hereafter). Since SMEs are treated more favorably under the Corporate Tax Act than BEs in that only SMEs can take advantage of net operating loss carryback ('NOL carryback' hereafter) and can also deduct percentage-of-tax-liability up to 30% of tax liability without any corporate activities (special tax deduction' hereafter), the general expectation that taxable income and its conforming book income is deferred would not hold for SMEs, and SMEs could have different incentives to accelerate accounting earnings instead around the tax rate reductions. Specifically, this study theoretically shows that if (i) the' pre-managed taxable income for the year immediately preceding tax rate reduction and that for the year tax rate reduction is enacted are negative and positive respectively. and (ii) the sum of those pre-managed taxable incomes is positive. then SMEs can minimize tax burden by accelerating earnings. and furthermore. provides evidence that such earnings management was so prevalent around the tax rate reductions enacted in 2002 and 2005. Additionally, this study also provides evidence that the general income-deferring earnings management was not so prevalent around the tax rate reduction in 2002, when the magnitude of tax rate 'reduction was slight and managers had little time to contemplate on whether to engage in the earnings management. and. as a result. supplements previous studies. Because the government is driving a big tax rate reduction and emphasizing tax incentives for SMEs. this study is expect to help fine-tune the policy and forecast effects of the policy.
    번역하기

    This study theoretically and empirically analyzes the tax-minimizing behavior of small and mid-sized enterprises ('SMEs' hereafter) around the tax rate reductions enacted in 2002 and 2005, which is qualitatively different from that of big enterprises ...

    This study theoretically and empirically analyzes the tax-minimizing behavior of small and mid-sized enterprises ('SMEs' hereafter) around the tax rate reductions enacted in 2002 and 2005, which is qualitatively different from that of big enterprises ('BEs' hereafter). Since SMEs are treated more favorably under the Corporate Tax Act than BEs in that only SMEs can take advantage of net operating loss carryback ('NOL carryback' hereafter) and can also deduct percentage-of-tax-liability up to 30% of tax liability without any corporate activities (special tax deduction' hereafter), the general expectation that taxable income and its conforming book income is deferred would not hold for SMEs, and SMEs could have different incentives to accelerate accounting earnings instead around the tax rate reductions. Specifically, this study theoretically shows that if (i) the' pre-managed taxable income for the year immediately preceding tax rate reduction and that for the year tax rate reduction is enacted are negative and positive respectively. and (ii) the sum of those pre-managed taxable incomes is positive. then SMEs can minimize tax burden by accelerating earnings. and furthermore. provides evidence that such earnings management was so prevalent around the tax rate reductions enacted in 2002 and 2005. Additionally, this study also provides evidence that the general income-deferring earnings management was not so prevalent around the tax rate reduction in 2002, when the magnitude of tax rate 'reduction was slight and managers had little time to contemplate on whether to engage in the earnings management. and. as a result. supplements previous studies. Because the government is driving a big tax rate reduction and emphasizing tax incentives for SMEs. this study is expect to help fine-tune the policy and forecast effects of the policy.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 전병욱, "최저한세가 기업의 조세부담의 공평성에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증분석" 한국경영학회 36 (36): 981-1007, 2007

    2 전규안, "조세비용과 비조세비용의 상충관계가 재무보고이익과 세무보고이익의 차이에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 29 (29): 29-56, 2004

    3 이은철, "재량적 발생액을 이용한 횡단면적 분포도상의 적자회피 이익조정에 대한 재조명" 한국회계학회 32 (32): 61-87, 2007

    4 정운오, "세무조정자료의 분석을 통해 살펴본 우리나라 기업의 재무이익과 세무이익의 차이" 한국회계학회 31 (31): 203-238, 2006

    5 고종권, "세금비용과 비세금비용이 재무보고이익과 세무보고이익의 차이에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 75-104, 2003

    6 국세청, "보도자료: ’07년 3월 법인세 신고시 이런 점 유의해서 신고하세요! (2007.02.12.)"

    7 재정경제부, "보도자료: 2007년 세제개편(안) (2007.08.22.)"

    8 김경호, "법인세율 인하에 따른 기업의 이익조정행태" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 85-120, 2003

    9 Choi, W., "The provision of tax services by incumbent auditors and earning management: Evidence from Korea" Yonsei University 2008

    10 Klassen, J.K., "The impact of inside ownership concentration on the trade-off between financial and tax reporting" 72 (72): 455-474, 1997

    1 전병욱, "최저한세가 기업의 조세부담의 공평성에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증분석" 한국경영학회 36 (36): 981-1007, 2007

    2 전규안, "조세비용과 비조세비용의 상충관계가 재무보고이익과 세무보고이익의 차이에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 29 (29): 29-56, 2004

    3 이은철, "재량적 발생액을 이용한 횡단면적 분포도상의 적자회피 이익조정에 대한 재조명" 한국회계학회 32 (32): 61-87, 2007

    4 정운오, "세무조정자료의 분석을 통해 살펴본 우리나라 기업의 재무이익과 세무이익의 차이" 한국회계학회 31 (31): 203-238, 2006

    5 고종권, "세금비용과 비세금비용이 재무보고이익과 세무보고이익의 차이에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 75-104, 2003

    6 국세청, "보도자료: ’07년 3월 법인세 신고시 이런 점 유의해서 신고하세요! (2007.02.12.)"

    7 재정경제부, "보도자료: 2007년 세제개편(안) (2007.08.22.)"

    8 김경호, "법인세율 인하에 따른 기업의 이익조정행태" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 85-120, 2003

    9 Choi, W., "The provision of tax services by incumbent auditors and earning management: Evidence from Korea" Yonsei University 2008

    10 Klassen, J.K., "The impact of inside ownership concentration on the trade-off between financial and tax reporting" 72 (72): 455-474, 1997

    11 Scholes, M.S., "Taxes and Business Strategy: A Planning Approach" Prentice Hall 1992

    12 Maydew, E.L., "Tax-induced earnings management by firms with net operating losses" 35 (35): 83-96, 1997

    13 Lopez, T.J., "Identifying tax-induced earnings management around TRA 86 as a function of prior tax-aggressive behavior" 20 (20): 37-56, 1998

    14 Scholes, M.S., "Firms' response to anticipated reductions in tax rates: The Tax Reform Act of 1986" 30 (30): 161-185, 1992

    15 Wilkie, P.J., "Empirical evidence of implicit taxes in the corporate sector" 14 (14): 97-116, 1992

    16 Guenther, D.A., "Earnings management in response to corporate tax rate changes: Evidence from the 1986 Tax Reform Act" 69 (69): 230-243, 1994

    17 DeChow, P., "Detecting earnings management" 70 (70): 193-225, 1995

    18 Desai, M.A., "Corporate tax avaoidance and high-powered incentives" 79 : 145-179, 2006

    19 Mills, L.F., "Bridging the reporting gap: A proposal for more infor-mative reconciling of book and tax income" 56 (56): 1-19, 2003

    20 재정경제부, "2007 조세지출보고서" 2007

    21 재정경제부, "2006 조세지출보고서" 2006

    22 재정경제부, "2005 조세지출보고서" 2005

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼